12. Table 2 shows that sampling <strong>methods</strong> and metrics <strong>of</strong>ten differ between countriesat GIG level, and that apart from biomass as indicated from chlorophyllc<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s, for a specific lake or lake type each country uses different metrics.Also, there are no countries that completely fulfill the WFD metric requirements.Table 2. Phytoplankt<strong>on</strong> sampling device and metrics used in different countries within theGIGs.GIG/ Sampling methodMetricCountryALPINEATabundance, biomass, group ratios, indicator taxaITabundanceAT point samples abundance, biomass, indicator taxa, group ratiosSI single depth samples temporal and spatial distributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> different speciesDE integrated samples species compositi<strong>on</strong> and abundance or abundance and biomass<strong>of</strong> single speciesFR net <strong>on</strong> secchi depth or <strong>on</strong>integrated sampling from 0to 50mabundanceATLANTICIE standard net or aliquot <strong>of</strong> relative abundance, indicator taxa and group ratios, annual cycle,GBPLLVEEPLNLDEROintegrated sampleRutner water sampler everymetre from surfacecomposited, supplementedby phytoplankt<strong>on</strong> net towover lake surface.Composite tube sampling.abundance estimated by analysis <strong>of</strong> the pigment chlorophyllabundance and identificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> algal speciesBALTIC15 l <strong>of</strong> water filtered by dominance structure, indicator taxa.plankt<strong>on</strong> net No25 from thedepth <strong>of</strong> 1m and 5m.with Ruttner bathometer, biomass, indicator taxa, relative c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cyanophyta,from 0,5 m depth other Chrysophyta, Bacillariophyta etc, saprobic index, number <strong>of</strong>from 0.2-0.3 m depth and 5-species10mRuttner sampler or VanDorn sampler Utermöhl's(1958) technique1l and qualitative drawnsample from photic z<strong>on</strong>e.plankt<strong>on</strong>-net no 25.abundance, frequency <strong>of</strong> occurrence, indicator taxa, group ratios,percentages <strong>of</strong> larger tax<strong>on</strong>omic groups, community structure,chlorophyll a c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>CENTRALdominance structure, indicator taxa.cell counting (from col<strong>on</strong>ies cells are estimated), identificati<strong>on</strong> tospecies or to genera level, share <strong>of</strong> groups (diatoms-blue – greenotheralgae)surface sample or standard No informati<strong>on</strong> availablewater sampler in a depth <strong>of</strong>1 m, or 5-liter integralsampler, sampling theepilimnetic layersamples takes with bucket,Knopp method SR ISOspecies density, abundance, wet biomass, biomass <strong>on</strong>systematical gr, probic index52
PTESFIIE5667-2/98 Romanianstandardisated method(STAS-ICIM)bottle sampler andUtermohl method -qualitative analysisMEDITERRANEANspecies abundance classes (present, frequent, abundant andbloom)abundance and species compositi<strong>on</strong>NORTHERNOne composite sample from biomass, species number, relative abundance.the epilimni<strong>on</strong>, usually 0 - 2m. Sampling, preservati<strong>on</strong>and analysis described indetail in Swedish EPAreports 4860 and 4861.Standard net, haul from 6mfor quantitative data andsub-surface waterrelative abundance, indicator taxa and group ratiosGB 5m integrated tube, species listNO 2m tube sampler taken atsite <strong>of</strong> max.depth. Separatesamples are mixed fromdifferent depth intervals: 0-2, 2-4, 4-6 m etc. down to2x secchi depthbiomass per species for each species presentSEdepth- and surfaceintegrated pelagial samplescollected with a plexiglasstube. Sampling,preservati<strong>on</strong>, and analysesdescribed in detail inSwedish EPA reports 4860and 4861total biovolumePHYTOBENTHOS13. Most countries do not use phytobenthos in their <strong>biological</strong> m<strong>on</strong>itoring (Fig. 12),The highest number <strong>of</strong> lakes m<strong>on</strong>itored for phytobenthos is found in the EC GIGfollowed closely by CE and AL GIGs, while in the NO GIG countries this <strong>biological</strong>element is not used at all.53
- Page 1 and 2: Institute for Environment and Susta
- Page 3 and 4: CONTENTSBackground and purpose of t
- Page 5 and 6: Background and purpose of the docum
- Page 7 and 8: States and candidate countries. Inf
- Page 9 and 10: classification, each of these being
- Page 11 and 12: BIOLOGICAL QUALITY ELEMENT: PHYTOPL
- Page 13 and 14: indicators, species lists, frequenc
- Page 15 and 16: 53. The identification and enumerat
- Page 17 and 18: 64. In general, this technique is t
- Page 19 and 20: RIVER BIOLOGICAL QUALITY ELEMENT: F
- Page 21 and 22: 84. The development of specific sta
- Page 23 and 24: practice guides for identification
- Page 25 and 26: 100. The information received from
- Page 27 and 28: Evaluation of the suitability of cu
- Page 29 and 30: group should update its primary fin
- Page 31 and 32: ReferencesAFNOR (Association Franç
- Page 33 and 34: EN ISO 8689-2 Water quality - Biolo
- Page 35 and 36: Lazaridou-Dimitriadou, M., C. Kouko
- Page 37 and 38: Shannon, C.E. and W. Weaver, 1949.
- Page 39: Annex I: Composition of the Geograp
- Page 43 and 44: Annex III: River biological assessm
- Page 45 and 46: Annex IV: Analysis of lake biologic
- Page 47 and 48: Number of sampling stations10080%60
- Page 49 and 50: IT 90% acetone spectrophotometricPT
- Page 51: 10. The sampling depth and volume s
- Page 55 and 56: Sampling stations%1008060402001 2-1
- Page 57 and 58: MACROPHYTES16. The aquatic Macrophy
- Page 59 and 60: Plants sampled per GIG1008060%40Eme
- Page 61 and 62: NO qualitativ method species number
- Page 63 and 64: indicators, species lists, frequenc
- Page 65 and 66: 26. The sampling frequency is varia
- Page 67: CEN/TC 230/WG 2/ TG 4 N28, 2 nd wor
- Page 70 and 71: programs are based only on the diat
- Page 72 and 73: 21. Some countries like France, Est
- Page 74 and 75: Table 1. European methods for monit
- Page 76 and 77: countries also covers Non-EU Member
- Page 78 and 79: 49. The Danish Stream Fauna Index i
- Page 80 and 81: Hungary58. Since 2002 a modificatio
- Page 82 and 83: Acidification Index, based on the s
- Page 84 and 85: Identification is predominantly to
- Page 86 and 87: size of the net range between 250 t
- Page 88 and 89: water bug genus (Aphelocheirus) and
- Page 90 and 91: Table 5. Common abundance classific
- Page 92 and 93: 108. Process Assessment focuses on
- Page 94 and 95: Austria120. MuLFA: Ecological Integ
- Page 96 and 97: Sweden126. Swedish fish Index: Appe
- Page 98 and 99: ut comparisons have been made with
- Page 100 and 101: seasons for sampling are summer and
- Page 102 and 103:
102
- Page 104 and 105:
Consultation open to ECOSTAT &inter
- Page 106 and 107:
Table 1. List of European standards
- Page 108 and 109:
108
- Page 110 and 111:
development of typologySweden Yes,
- Page 112 and 113:
one or other option depends on the
- Page 114 and 115:
114
- Page 116 and 117:
• An integrated holistic evaluati
- Page 118 and 119:
• Phytoplankton: Yes; Clorophyll
- Page 120 and 121:
• Macroalgae: No• Benthic inver
- Page 122 and 123:
• Macrophytes: No• Macroalgae:
- Page 124:
Mission of the JRCThe mission of th