13.07.2015 Views

Report on Harmonisation of freshwater biological methods

Report on Harmonisation of freshwater biological methods

Report on Harmonisation of freshwater biological methods

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10. The sampling depth and volume sampled may c<strong>on</strong>tribute to large differences inthe measured phytoplankt<strong>on</strong> biomass and tax<strong>on</strong>omic compositi<strong>on</strong>. The most frequentmethod involves the collecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> surface samples or other discrete samples althoughsome countries take integrated samples (a few lakes by most countries in the NO,some in the AL, AT and ME GIGs) (Fig. 10).12010080Sampling depth%6040200AL AT BA CE EC ME NO1 surf. Sample 1 integrated sample +1 discrete sampleFigure 10. Phytoplankt<strong>on</strong> sampling depth in the GIGs.11. Also, the metrics used in the assessment differ both within and am<strong>on</strong>g GIGs, butmost countries measure abundance and biomass and successively less countries recordbloom occurrence, size compositi<strong>on</strong> and primary productivity (Fig. 11).Phytoplankt<strong>on</strong> metrics%1009080706050403020100AL AT BA CE EC ME NOsize compositi<strong>on</strong>abundancebiomassbloom occurrenceprimary productivityFigure 11. Phytoplankt<strong>on</strong> metrics in the GIGs.51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!