Report on Harmonisation of freshwater biological methods
Report on Harmonisation of freshwater biological methods
Report on Harmonisation of freshwater biological methods
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Background and purpose <strong>of</strong> the document1. The Water Framework Directive (WFD) requires (Annex V 1.3.6) that standards<strong>methods</strong> are used for the m<strong>on</strong>itoring <strong>of</strong> water quality elements: ‘Methods used for them<strong>on</strong>itoring <strong>of</strong> type parameters shall c<strong>on</strong>form to the internati<strong>on</strong>al standards listedbelow or such other nati<strong>on</strong>al or internati<strong>on</strong>al standards which will ensure theprovisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> data <strong>of</strong> an equivalent scientific quality and comparability’.2. In the c<strong>on</strong>text <strong>of</strong> the WFD Comm<strong>on</strong> Implementati<strong>on</strong> Strategy (CIS)Intercalibrati<strong>on</strong> Working Group (WG), a comm<strong>on</strong> issue raised by lake and riverexperts was the lack <strong>of</strong> comparability <strong>of</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>al <strong>biological</strong> assessment systems due todifferent sampling and analytical procedures, and use <strong>of</strong> different metrics for theassessment <strong>of</strong> the degree <strong>of</strong> impact due to the same pressure. This resulted in a str<strong>on</strong>grecommendati<strong>on</strong> from these networks <strong>of</strong> experts for the harm<strong>on</strong>isati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> thesemethodologies and the possible identificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> comm<strong>on</strong> metrics.3. Thus, in the workshop <strong>of</strong> the WFD-CIS Intercalibrati<strong>on</strong> WG, in March 2003 at theJRC, Ispra, it was decided to initiate a task <strong>on</strong> the review <strong>of</strong> the needs forharm<strong>on</strong>isati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>freshwater</strong> <strong>biological</strong> <strong>methods</strong>, under the WFD-CIS WG 2AECOSTAT. The first c<strong>on</strong>tacts and presentati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> this activity was at the meeting <strong>of</strong>the WG 2A in October 2003 at the JRC, Ispra.4. The report from this task will support the Geographic Intercalibrati<strong>on</strong> Groups(GIGs) in the intercalibrati<strong>on</strong> exercise by providing a c<strong>on</strong>cise overview <strong>of</strong> theavailable <strong>methods</strong> to be c<strong>on</strong>sidered as potential candidates for comm<strong>on</strong> metrics. Thiscan be applied for the harm<strong>on</strong>ised assessment <strong>of</strong> the water bodies bel<strong>on</strong>ging to theintercalibrati<strong>on</strong> network. Furthermore, it identifies the need for the development <strong>of</strong>new <strong>methods</strong> or the further harm<strong>on</strong>isati<strong>on</strong> and standardisati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> existing <strong>methods</strong>and proposes a procedure to link WFD relevant groups with Comité Européen deNormalisati<strong>on</strong> (CEN) working group elaborating <strong>biological</strong> and ecological assessment<strong>methods</strong>.5. The overall objectives <strong>of</strong> this task are 1) to make an overview and comparis<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong>the nati<strong>on</strong>al <strong>biological</strong> <strong>methods</strong> currently in use in EU countries; 2) to evaluate theirapplicability in the assessment <strong>of</strong> the ecological quality <strong>of</strong> inland surface waters (lakesand rivers) as required by the WFD; 3) to evaluate their suitability for use as comm<strong>on</strong>5