13.07.2015 Views

Report on Harmonisation of freshwater biological methods

Report on Harmonisation of freshwater biological methods

Report on Harmonisation of freshwater biological methods

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Number <strong>of</strong> sampling stati<strong>on</strong>s10080%6040201 sampling stati<strong>on</strong>2-10 samplingstati<strong>on</strong>s0AL AT BA CE EC ME NOFigure 4. Number <strong>of</strong> sampling stati<strong>on</strong>s for chlorophyll a in the GIGs.4. The sampling depth and volume sampled may c<strong>on</strong>tribute to large differences inthe determinati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> chlorophyll a c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s in a lake. The most frequent methodin all the GIGs involves the collecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> surface samples. In some GIGs (mostcountries in the AL, ME and NO GIGs), for a few lakes chlorophyll a is estimatedfrom integrated samples (Fig. 5). In the AL and BA GIGs the collecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> more than<strong>on</strong>e discrete sample at different depths is regularly practiced.Sampling depth10080%6040200AL AT BA CE EC ME NO1 surface sample 1 integrated sample more than 1 discrete depthsFigure 5. Sampling depth for chlorophyll a in the GIGs.5. Am<strong>on</strong>g the most heterogeneous steps in the assessment <strong>of</strong> chlorophyll a are,however, the extracti<strong>on</strong> <strong>methods</strong> (e.g. Marker, 1972; Pepe et al, 2001), which varywidely within GIGs, am<strong>on</strong>g GIGs and even within a single country (Table 1). Thesecan explain c<strong>on</strong>siderable variance in the measurement <strong>of</strong> chlorophyll a c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>.47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!