Report on Harmonisation of freshwater biological methods

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Buffagni, A. and S. Erba, 2004. A simple procedure to harmonize class boundaries of Europeanassessment systems. Discussion paper for the Intercalibration process – WFD CIS WG 2.AECOSTAT. February, 6 th 2004.Capra, H., 1995. Amélioration des modèles prédictifs d’habitat de la truite fario : échellesd’échantillonnage, intégration des chroniques hydrologiques. Ph.D. thesis, University of Lyon I,Villeurbanne, France. 268 p.Cairns, J.Jr., D.W. Albough, F. Susey and M.D.Charry, 1968. The sequential comparison index - asimplified method for non-biologists to estimate relative differences in biological diversity in streampollution studies. J.Water Poll. Contrl.Fed. 40: 1607-1613.CEMAGREF, 1982. Etude des méthodes biologiques d'appréciation quantitative de la qualité des eaux.Rapport Q.E. Lyon A.F. Bassin Rhône-Méditérannée-Corse, 218p.Cimdins, P., I. Druvietis, R. Liepa, E. Parele, L. Urtane and A. Urtans, 1995. A Latvian catalogue ofindicator species of freshwater saprobity. Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences570/571(1/2 122-133.SN 75 7716:1998. Water quality, biological analysis, determination of saprobic index. CzechTechnical State Standard, Czech Standards Institute, Prague.De Pauw, N. and H. Vanhooren, 1983. Method for biological quality assessment of water courses inBelgium. Hydrobiologia 100: 153-168.De Pauw, N. and S. Heylen, 2001. Biotic index for sediment quality assessment of watercourses inFlanders, Belgium. Aquatic Ecology 35: 121-133.Didier, J., 1997. Indice biotique d’intégrité piscicole pour évaluer la qualité écologique desécosystèmes lotiques. PhD thesis, Presses Universitaires de Namur, Belgium, 313 p.DIN 38 410:1990. Deutsche Einheitsverfahren zur Wasser-, Abwasser- und Schlammuntersuchung -Biologisch-ökologische Gewässeruntersuchung (Gruppe M) - Bestimmung des Saprobienindex (M2). Deutsches Institut für Normung, Berlin.DIN 38 410:2003. Deutsche Einheitsverfahren zur Wasser-, Abwasser- und Schlammuntersuchung -Biologisch-ökologische Gewässeruntersuchung (Gruppe M) - Teil 1: Bestimmung desSaprobienindex in Fließgewässern (M 1). Normentwurf, Deutsches Institut für Normung, Berlin.Dussling, U., H. Klinger, C. Wolter and R. Berg, 2004. Assessing the Ecological Status of RiverSystems Using Fish Assemblages, pp 1 - 84 - In: Steinberg et al (eds.) Handbuch angew.Limnologie, Ecomed, Landsberg.EN 25667-1 Water quality –Sampling- Part 1: Guidance on the design of sampling programmes (ISO5667-1:1980)EN 25667-2 Water quality – Sampling – Part 2: Guidance on sampling techniques (ISO 5667-2:1991)EN 27828 Water quality – Methods of biological sampling - Guidance on handnet sampling of aquaticbenthic macro-invertebrates (ISO 7828:1985)EN 28265 Water quality – Methods of biological sampling – Guidance on the design and use ofquantitative samplers for benthic macro-invertebrates on stony substrata in shallow freshwaters (ISO8265:1988)EN ISO 5667-3 Water quality – Sampling guidance on the preservation and handling of samples (ISO5667-3:1994)EN ISO 9391 Water Quality – Sampling in deep waters for macro-invertebrates – Guidance on the useof colonization, qualitative and quantitative samples (ISO 9391:1993)EN ISO 5667-16 Water quality – Sampling – Part 16: Guidance on biotesting of samples (ISO 5667-16:1998)EN ISO 8689-1 Water quality – Biological classification of rivers – Part 1: Guidance on theinterpretation of biological quality data from surveys of benthic macro-invertebrates in runningwaters (ISO 8689-1:2000)32
EN ISO 8689-2 Water quality – Biological classification of rivers – Part 2: Guidance on thepresentation of biological quality data from surveys of benthic macro-invertebrates (ISO 8689-1:2000)EN 14184 Water quality – Guidance standard for the surveying of aquatic macrophytes in runningwatersEN 13946 Water Quality – Guidance standard for the routine sampling and pre-treatment of benthicdiatoms from riversEN 14011 Water analysis – Sampling of fish with electricityEN 14407 Water quality – Guidance standard for the identification, enumeration and interpretation ofbenthic diatom samples from running watersEN 14614 Water quality – Guidace standard for assessing the hydromorlogical features of riversEngel, S., and S. A. Nichols, 1994. Aquatic macrophyte growth in a turbid windswept lake. JFreshwater Ecology 9(2) 97-110.Environment Agency 1996 The quality of rivers and canals in England and Wales (1990 to 1995).Environment Agency, Bristol.European Communities, 2003d. WFD CIS Guidance Document No. 10. Rivers and lakes – Typology,reference conditions and classification systems. Produced by Working Group 2.3 - REFCOND.http://forum.europa.eu.int/Public/irc/env/wfd/libraryEuropean Communities 2004. Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive(2000/60/EC). Overall Approach to the Classification of Ecological Status and Ecological Potential.Extence, C.A., D.M. Balbi and R.P. Chadd, 1999. River flow indexing using British benthicmacroinvertebrates : a framework for setting hydroecological objectives. Regulated Rivers: Researchand Management 15: 543-574.Gassner, H. and J. Wanzenböck, 1999: Fischökologische Leitbilder fünf ausgewählterSalzkammergutseen. Limnologica 29, 436-448Ghetti, P.F., 1997. Manuale di applicazione Indice Biotico Esteso (I.B.E.). I macroinvertebratinell'controllo della qualità degli ambienti di aque correnti. - Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Agenziaprovinciale per la protezione dell’ambienti.Golterman, H. L., R.S. Clymo and M.A.M. Ohnstand, 1978. Methods for physical & chemical analysisof fresh waters. Blackwell Sci. Publ., London, 213p.Grbovi, J., 1999. Water quality monitoring in Slovenia. In: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Limnologie(DGL) Tagungsbericht 1998. Band II. DGL, Tutzing: 517-520.Heiskanen, A.-S, W.J. van de Bund, A.C. Cardoso and P. Nõges, 2004. Towards good ecological statusof surface waters in Europe – Interpretation and harmonisation of the concept”. Water Science andTechnology 49 (7) 169-177.Hering, D., O. Moog, L. Sandin and P.F.M. Verdonschot, 2004. Overview and application of theAQEM assessment system. Hydrobiologia 516: 1-20.HMSO 1980. See http://www.opsi.gov.uk/about/hmso.htmHofmann, G., 1994. Aufwuchs-Diatomeen in Seen und ihre Eignung als Indikatoren der Trophie.Bbliotheca Diatomologica, 30. J. Cramer, Berlin, 241 pp.Holmes, N.T.H., J.R. Newman, S. Chadd, K.J. Rouen, L. Saint and F.H. Dawson, 1999. Mean TrophicRank: A User's Manual. R & D Technical <strong>Report</strong> E38. Bristol. Environment Agency.Jäger, P, K. Pall and E. Dunfarth, 2002. Zur Methodik der Makrophytenkartierung in großen Seen.Österr. Fischerei 55: 230-238.Jager, P., K. Pall and E. Dumfarth, 2004. A method of mapping macrophytes in large lakes with regardto the requirements of the Water Framework Directive. Limnologica 2004, Heft 34, S. 140-146.Jeffrey, S.W. and G.F Humphrey, 1975. New Spectrophotometric equations for determiningchlorophylls a, b, c1 and c2 in higher plants, algae, and natural phytoplankton. Biochem. Physiol.Pflanz. 167: 191-194.33
Page 1 and 2: Institute for Environment and Susta
Page 3 and 4: CONTENTSBackground and purpose of t
Page 5 and 6: Background and purpose of the docum
Page 7 and 8: States and candidate countries. Inf
Page 9 and 10: classification, each of these being
Page 11 and 12: BIOLOGICAL QUALITY ELEMENT: PHYTOPL
Page 13 and 14: indicators, species lists, frequenc
Page 15 and 16: 53. The identification and enumerat
Page 17 and 18: 64. In general, this technique is t
Page 19 and 20: RIVER BIOLOGICAL QUALITY ELEMENT: F
Page 21 and 22: 84. The development of specific sta
Page 23 and 24: practice guides for identification
Page 25 and 26: 100. The information received from
Page 27 and 28: Evaluation of the suitability of cu
Page 29 and 30: group should update its primary fin
Page 31: ReferencesAFNOR (Association Franç
Page 35 and 36: Lazaridou-Dimitriadou, M., C. Kouko
Page 37 and 38: Shannon, C.E. and W. Weaver, 1949.
Page 39: Annex I: Composition of the Geograp
Page 43 and 44: Annex III: River biological assessm
Page 45 and 46: Annex IV: Analysis of lake biologic
Page 47 and 48: Number of sampling stations10080%60
Page 49 and 50: IT 90% acetone spectrophotometricPT
Page 51 and 52: 10. The sampling depth and volume s
Page 53 and 54: PTESFIIE5667-2/98 Romanianstandardi
Page 55 and 56: Sampling stations%1008060402001 2-1
Page 57 and 58: MACROPHYTES16. The aquatic Macrophy
Page 59 and 60: Plants sampled per GIG1008060%40Eme
Page 61 and 62: NO qualitativ method species number
Page 63 and 64: indicators, species lists, frequenc
Page 65 and 66: 26. The sampling frequency is varia
Page 67: CEN/TC 230/WG 2/ TG 4 N28, 2 nd wor
Page 70 and 71: programs are based only on the diat
Page 72 and 73: 21. Some countries like France, Est
Page 74 and 75: Table 1. European methods for monit
Page 76 and 77: countries also covers Non-EU Member
Page 78 and 79: 49. The Danish Stream Fauna Index i
Page 80 and 81: Hungary58. Since 2002 a modificatio
Page 82 and 83:
Acidification Index, based on the s
Page 84 and 85:
Identification is predominantly to
Page 86 and 87:
size of the net range between 250 t
Page 88 and 89:
water bug genus (Aphelocheirus) and
Page 90 and 91:
Table 5. Common abundance classific
Page 92 and 93:
108. Process Assessment focuses on
Page 94 and 95:
Austria120. MuLFA: Ecological Integ
Page 96 and 97:
Sweden126. Swedish fish Index: Appe
Page 98 and 99:
ut comparisons have been made with
Page 100 and 101:
seasons for sampling are summer and
Page 102 and 103:
102
Page 104 and 105:
Consultation open to ECOSTAT &inter
Page 106 and 107:
Table 1. List of European standards
Page 108 and 109:
108
Page 110 and 111:
development of typologySweden Yes,
Page 112 and 113:
one or other option depends on the
Page 114 and 115:
114
Page 116 and 117:
• An integrated holistic evaluati
Page 118 and 119:
• Phytoplankton: Yes; Clorophyll
Page 120 and 121:
• Macroalgae: No• Benthic inver
Page 122 and 123:
• Macrophytes: No• Macroalgae:
Page 124:
Mission of the JRCThe mission of th
show all

Report on Harmonisation of freshwater biological methods

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?