- Page 1: Institute for Environment and Susta
- Page 5 and 6: Background and purpose of the docum
- Page 7 and 8: States and candidate countries. Inf
- Page 9 and 10: classification, each of these being
- Page 11 and 12: BIOLOGICAL QUALITY ELEMENT: PHYTOPL
- Page 13 and 14: indicators, species lists, frequenc
- Page 15 and 16: 53. The identification and enumerat
- Page 17 and 18: 64. In general, this technique is t
- Page 19 and 20: RIVER BIOLOGICAL QUALITY ELEMENT: F
- Page 21 and 22: 84. The development of specific sta
- Page 23 and 24: practice guides for identification
- Page 25 and 26: 100. The information received from
- Page 27 and 28: Evaluation of the suitability of cu
- Page 29 and 30: group should update its primary fin
- Page 31 and 32: ReferencesAFNOR (Association Franç
- Page 33 and 34: EN ISO 8689-2 Water quality - Biolo
- Page 35 and 36: Lazaridou-Dimitriadou, M., C. Kouko
- Page 37 and 38: Shannon, C.E. and W. Weaver, 1949.
- Page 39: Annex I: Composition of the Geograp
- Page 43 and 44: Annex III: River biological assessm
- Page 45 and 46: Annex IV: Analysis of lake biologic
- Page 47 and 48: Number of sampling stations10080%60
- Page 49 and 50: IT 90% acetone spectrophotometricPT
- Page 51 and 52: 10. The sampling depth and volume s
- Page 53 and 54:
PTESFIIE5667-2/98 Romanianstandardi
- Page 55 and 56:
Sampling stations%1008060402001 2-1
- Page 57 and 58:
MACROPHYTES16. The aquatic Macrophy
- Page 59 and 60:
Plants sampled per GIG1008060%40Eme
- Page 61 and 62:
NO qualitativ method species number
- Page 63 and 64:
indicators, species lists, frequenc
- Page 65 and 66:
26. The sampling frequency is varia
- Page 67:
CEN/TC 230/WG 2/ TG 4 N28, 2 nd wor
- Page 70 and 71:
programs are based only on the diat
- Page 72 and 73:
21. Some countries like France, Est
- Page 74 and 75:
Table 1. European methods for monit
- Page 76 and 77:
countries also covers Non-EU Member
- Page 78 and 79:
49. The Danish Stream Fauna Index i
- Page 80 and 81:
Hungary58. Since 2002 a modificatio
- Page 82 and 83:
Acidification Index, based on the s
- Page 84 and 85:
Identification is predominantly to
- Page 86 and 87:
size of the net range between 250 t
- Page 88 and 89:
water bug genus (Aphelocheirus) and
- Page 90 and 91:
Table 5. Common abundance classific
- Page 92 and 93:
108. Process Assessment focuses on
- Page 94 and 95:
Austria120. MuLFA: Ecological Integ
- Page 96 and 97:
Sweden126. Swedish fish Index: Appe
- Page 98 and 99:
ut comparisons have been made with
- Page 100 and 101:
seasons for sampling are summer and
- Page 102 and 103:
102
- Page 104 and 105:
Consultation open to ECOSTAT &inter
- Page 106 and 107:
Table 1. List of European standards
- Page 108 and 109:
108
- Page 110 and 111:
development of typologySweden Yes,
- Page 112 and 113:
one or other option depends on the
- Page 114 and 115:
114
- Page 116 and 117:
• An integrated holistic evaluati
- Page 118 and 119:
• Phytoplankton: Yes; Clorophyll
- Page 120 and 121:
• Macroalgae: No• Benthic inver
- Page 122 and 123:
• Macrophytes: No• Macroalgae:
- Page 124:
Mission of the JRCThe mission of th