13.07.2015 Views

Report on Harmonisation of freshwater biological methods

Report on Harmonisation of freshwater biological methods

Report on Harmonisation of freshwater biological methods

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Annex VIII: Compatibility <strong>of</strong> the nati<strong>on</strong>al classificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>methods</strong> withWFD requirementsTable 1. Summary <strong>of</strong> the informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the compatibility <strong>of</strong> the nati<strong>on</strong>al classificati<strong>on</strong><strong>methods</strong> with the WFD requirements obtained by the Ecostat group WG 2A.Country5 qualityclassesCriteria for WFD compatibilityReference Reference c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>sC<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>sWFD compatibleAquatic floraEst<strong>on</strong>ia no inf. no inf. no inf. no inf.Finland no inf. no inf. no inf. no inf.Ireland no inf. no inf. no inf. no inf.Ireland no inf. no inf. no inf. no inf.Latvia no inf. no inf. no inf. no inf.Latvia no inf. no inf. no inf. no inf.Method applicabilityLithuania no inf. no inf. no inf. no inf.Lithuaniano not yet, depending <strong>on</strong>development <strong>of</strong> typologynot yetneeds further elaborati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong>reference c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>sSweden no inf. tests <strong>of</strong> m<strong>on</strong>itoring carriedout in nati<strong>on</strong>al referencelakesnoc<strong>on</strong>sistent with WFD when adatabase <strong>of</strong> lake vegetati<strong>on</strong> iscompletedUK no inf. no no basis for generating the requiredmeasures for the WFD, not relatedto reference c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s and there isno classificati<strong>on</strong> scheme relating toquality statusSlovenia no inf. no no inf. noBenthic invertebrate faunaCY no inf. no no noLithuania no not yet, depending <strong>on</strong> not yetneeds further elaborati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong>development <strong>of</strong> typologyreference c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>sLatvia no inf. no inf. no inf. no inf.Sweden yes spatially based, best noyesavailable sites for sixecoregi<strong>on</strong>s (types)Ireland* no inf. no inf. no inf. no inf.Norway yes no no Needs further elaborati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong>reference c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>sUK* no inf. temporal referencing,rec<strong>on</strong>structing c<strong>on</strong>d., pH,NO3 and TP for larvalremains in sediment coresamples;spatial referencingyes, indicator assemblages yesidentified for different laketypes based <strong>on</strong> their c<strong>on</strong>d.,can be d<strong>on</strong>e for pH andnutrientsPhytoplankt<strong>on</strong>Latvia no inf. draft versi<strong>on</strong> yesAustria yes m<strong>on</strong>itoring <strong>on</strong> lakes for selected lakes in for selected lakes in Carinthia <strong>on</strong>lyincluding reference lakes Carinthia <strong>on</strong>lyEst<strong>on</strong>ia no inf. no inf. no inf. no inf.Finland no inf. no no inf. no inf.Ireland no inf. no inf. no inf. no inf.Lithuania no inf. no inf. no inf. no inf.Norway yes not yet, depending <strong>on</strong> no inf. no inf.109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!