13.07.2015 Views

The Prophet and His Day: Isaiah 1-39 - Free Bible Commentary

The Prophet and His Day: Isaiah 1-39 - Free Bible Commentary

The Prophet and His Day: Isaiah 1-39 - Free Bible Commentary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1. breath, 11:4; 25:4; 27:8; 30:28,33; 33:11; 59:192. wind, 7:2; 11:15; 17:13; 26:18; 32:2; 41:16,29; 57:13; 64:63. spirita. God’s Spirit, 11:2 (4 times); 30:1; 32:15; 34:16; 40:13; 42:1; 44:3; 48:16; 59:21; 61:1;63:10, 11,14b. human spirit, 4:4; 19:3,14; 26:9; 28:6; 29:10,24; 31:3; 37:7; 38:16: 42:5; 54:6; 57:15(twice), 16; 61:3; 65:14; 66:2However in Wisdom Literature the term denotes meaninglessness or emptiness (i.e., Eccl. 1:14,17;2:11,17,26; 4:4,6,16; 5:16; 6:9). I think <strong>Isaiah</strong>’s usage in 26:18 <strong>and</strong> 41:29 best fits this secondconnotation. Abraham’s seed could not bring the nations to YHWH because of1. their personal, individual fallenness2. the nations’ fallennessbut YHWH can (cf. v. 12)!<strong>The</strong> term “born” (BDB 656, KB 709, Qal IMPERFECT) in v. 18d literally means “to drop” or “tofall,” but is used metaphorically of giving birth. <strong>The</strong> Arabic root means to give birth; it is primarilyused of animals (cf. NIV).26:19 “Your dead will live;<strong>The</strong>ir corpses will rise” Verse 19 is contrasted with v. 14. That is why v. 14 cannot be thesource of theology. Verse 19 has much theological affinity to 25:8. <strong>The</strong> question we looked at in 26:3deals with whether this refers to a national entity or to an individual. <strong>The</strong> term “their” in v. 19b isliterally “my” in Hebrew. Here again is this play on the individual versus the national. Thisresurrection of national Israel has much in common with Ezekiel 37.<strong>The</strong>re are two IMPERATIVES in the verse which describe what the dead (“you who lie in the dust”)should do.1. awake, BDB 884, KB 1098, Hiphil IMPERATIVE2. shout, BDB 943, KB 1247, Piel IMPERATIVEResurrection is a concept that was apparently common in the ANE.1. Job (Edom in 2000 B.C. period), 14:13-15; 19:25-272. Egypt mummification (starting 3000± B.C., perfected in the Twenty First Dynasty)3. but not in MesopotamiaIf humans were created for fellowship with God but sin caused death, then a reversal for thefaithful seems logical. <strong>The</strong> rabbis (i.e., Pharisees) believed in a resurrection (cf. Acts 23:6; Heb. 6:1-2).Jesus believed in a resurrection (cf. Matt. 22:23-33; Luke 14:14; John 11:24-25). <strong>The</strong> concept ofheaven is a fellowship issue. Gehenna is the permanent isolation of those who refuse faith <strong>and</strong>fellowship! <strong>The</strong> imagery of the <strong>Bible</strong> for the future is a restored Eden (cf. Revelation 21-22).}NASB “the dew of the dawn”NKJV “the dew of herbs”NRSV, NJB “a radiant dew”TEV “as the sparkling dew”REB “a dew of sparkling light”Peshitta “a dew of light”JPSOA “the dew or fresh growth”This is literally “for a dew of light.” <strong>The</strong> word “light” (BDB 21) has two connotations.1. light of life vs. darkness of death (PLURAL, BDB 21 I, possibly Esther 8:16)2. herb (BDB 21 II, Gen. 1:11,12)<strong>The</strong>re are only two rainy seasons in Palestine. Between these times crops were sustained <strong>and</strong> grewby means of dew. <strong>The</strong>refore, both “dew” <strong>and</strong> “light” are symbols of life <strong>and</strong> growth!262

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!