13.07.2015 Views

CalCOFI Reports, Vol. 11, 1967 - California Cooperative Oceanic ...

CalCOFI Reports, Vol. 11, 1967 - California Cooperative Oceanic ...

CalCOFI Reports, Vol. 11, 1967 - California Cooperative Oceanic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

94 CALIFORNIA COOPERBTIVE OCEANIC FISHERIES INVESTIGATIONSThe low values since June 1963 is striking in all threeports Chimbote, Callao, and <strong>11</strong>0. It seems then thatthe reason for the poor fishing of 1963 was the lowabundance or low availability of the big adult fishduring this period.CAUSES OF REDUCED ABUNDANCE OF BIGADULT FISHNatural Fluctuations of RecruitmentThere is one phenomenon that is known to havecaused great fluctuations of stock size in a numberof marine fish populations, i.e., natural variations inrecruitment brought about by varying success of survivalof eggs and larvae from the different broods.The results of our length-measurements indicate thatsuch types of fluctuat,ions do occur also in the Peruviananchovy stock. Although direct age-determina-FIGURE 7. Abundance of recruit groups and the groups of adult fish.Chimbote and Callao together.tions are not available, it is possible from the sizecompositions to determine the age of the young fishand the size abundance curves offer a possibility toassess the abundance of the year-classes. In Figure 7,we have plotted the abundance of the recruit-groups1961 through 1964 as measured in two differentways, by their modal abundance and by the estimatedtotal number caught per unit of effort. Figure 7 alsoshows the abundance of the adult fish as the meanvalue of the months November through May eachyear. The recruitment apparently dropped off from1961 to 1962 and a further reduction took place in1963. In 1964, however, a very strong group wasrecruited to the fishery. As Figure 7 demonstrates,the reduction that occurred in the abundance of theadult fish is parallel to that of the recruits up till theseason November 1963 to May 1964. We expect thatthere will be a time lag of about one year between thestage at which we measure the abundance of therecruit-group (usually March to June) and the timewhen the group has reached the adult stage and thusmay influence the abundance of this group of 14-15ern fish. Figure 8 shows a comparison of recruitmentand abundance of adult fish when applying such atime-lag. A straight line from zero could be fittedreasonably well to these points, and confiding inthese results we could conclude that fluctuations inthe recruitment give cause to similar fluctuations inthe abundance of the total stock which again bringsabout considerable variations in the success of thefishing. Before drawing this conclusion, however, weshould await the results of the fishery during theperiod November 1964 through May 1965. The highrecruitment of 1964 should bring about a considerableincrease of the abundance of adult fish duringthis season. If this happens we think that the aboveconclusion can safely be drawn. It would then be amatter of great practical importance to be able toUJ600$00200200 400 600ABUNDANCE OF ADULT GROURNUMBER OF FISHES PER TRIP IN THOUSANDS2 4 6ABUNDANCE OF ADULT GROUPNUMBER OF FISHES PER TRIP IN MILLIONSFIGURE 8. Relation between abundance of recruit groups and groups of adult fish. The abundance of the recruit group is measured in two differ.ent ways.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!