76 CAIJFORSIA COOPERATIVE OCEANIC FISHERIES ISVESTIGATIOKSof Copepoda, 5.0% ; Calanoida, 79.2% ; Cyclopoida,15.8%. Information on the food of larvae within the5.0-9.0 mm length class is lacking, since, as is notedin Table 1, no individuals of this class containing foodin their intestinal tracts were found.As is shown clearly in tlie tables, the larvae andjuveniles of the Argentine anchovy are zooplanktofagousfrom their earliest stages, and the contributionof the phytoplankton to their diet is quite small.Furthermore, Fuster de Plaza and Boschi (1958),and Angelescu and Cousseau (1966), have found thatthe diet of the adult anchovy is made up almost exclusivelyof zooplankton.The diet of the larvae which are just beginning tofeed actively is made up almost exclusively by eggsand nauplii of Copepoda. The basic food supply forthe 9.0-22.0 mm length class is also comprised ofthe Copepoda at various stages of their development.The highest frequency of occurrence and the highestpercentage of weight correspond to the Calanoida.Together with the copepods the Cladocera appearabundantly. These results refer only to the summerseason, since it was not possible to collect larvaeof anchovy of this small size during other seasons ofthe year.For the larvae and juveniles in the 22.0-90.0 mmlength class, it was possible to give an account, asshown in Table 4, of the food composition throughoutthe year. As can readily be seen, the main componentsof the diet for this group are also variousgroups of Copepoda, especially the Calanoida. Amongthese groups the Cyclopoida are the least important,in this respect. Among the Cal;inoidu, the most frequentlyencountered species were Paracalaniis parczisand Centropages spp. and among the Cyclopoida,Oithona nzinuta and Corycaczis spp. Among the IIarpacticoida,only one species was found : Eictherpinaacutifrons.After the Copepoda, the Caldocera, which are especiallyabundant in both summer and winter, followin importance as food for the larvae and juvenilesof the anchovy. They are represented by two species:Po don p o 1 y p h em o ides and E 13 a d?z c ti o r d nt a nii.Larvae of Decapoda and Lainellibranchiata arefound in some individuals during all seasons of theyear, but in quantities of slight significance in respectto the total food supply. The same observation appliesalso to the eggs of various marine organisms, althoughtheir share in the total weight is somewhat greaterthan that of the aforementioned larrae. Most of theeggs of fishes found in the food content were anchovyeggs in spring, during October, and eggs of Prionotzissp. during February and March.Under the heading " undetermined ' ', remains offish muscles, which originated in all probability fromthe bait used by fishermen, were included.The contribution of phytoplankton to the diet ofthe anchovy deserves a more detailed analysis. As isshown in Table 4 the phytoplankton most frequentlyfound in the food supply were the diatoms Coscinodiscusspp. and Triceratizirn sp. and the dinoflagellatesExuviaella spp. Although these organisms are foundin many individuals and are occasionally very abun-dant, their significance in the total weight is low. Themost important place among the phytoplankters iscertainly occupied by Coscinodiscus spp. and Triceratiunzsp. During the summer a lesser contributionof the phytoplankton organisms is observed in theanchovy diet.Biddulphia sinensis, which appeared with the otherdiatoms, was treated separately, since the presence ofthis diatom, with long and acute appendices, in thefood supply of the anchovy was considered to be ofinterest. The rather limited contribution of thephytoplankton to the diet of the anchovy as shown bythe data of the present paper does not coincide withthe results obtained by Fuster de Plaza and Boschi(1958), who found a predominance of phytoplanktersin the diet of the juveniles of this species.An interesting fact that should be noted is the absenceof phytoplanktonic organisms from the dietof the larvae of smaller sizes. This is partially coincidentwith the findings of some authors, who haveshown that the larvae or juveniles of some species offishes feed upon relatively large organisms at first,and then change to smaller items as they grow. Thisis the case for Cdenyraulis mysticetiis (Bayliff 1963))Xardinops caeriilea (Hand and Berner 1959) , Brevoortiafyrranzis (June 1957) Sardina pilchardiis(Andreu 1960). etc. It seemed logical to expect tofind phytoplankters niore abundantly in the diet ofthe smaller larvae, and this was assumed so beforecompleting this study, since these organisms are thesmallest components of the diet. The larvae of thesmallest size in whose digestive tract some individualsof Exziviaella were found measured 26.0 mm. Thiswas an exceptional case, since the phytoplankterswere found in greater abundance and most frequentlyin larvae of 38.0-40.0 mm in length and longer.Figure 2 shows the relationship between the widthof the mouth and the range of prey width. The widthof the prey has been considered rather than the length,in the assumption that the possibility of ingestionfor a given organism depends more upon its widththan upon its length. The correlation found betweenthe width of the mouth and the length of the larvae islineal.After the time at which tlie larva reaches a lengthof 40 imn the width of the mouth increases at agreater rate, and the mouth begins to resemble thatof an adult anchovy. The dimensions of the largestorganisms ingested by larvae with lengths of 3.0-5.0mm range between 100 and 150 p. In the larvae of12.0-40.0 mm, although the dimensions of the mouthhare increased considerably, the size of the largest preystays at a more or less constant level, between 200 and500 p. Preys of much greater size are rarely found.The organisms of the smallest size begin to appear inthe intestinal content from the time at which thelarrar reach a length of 38 mm.The phenomenon of the retention of organisms ofsinall sizes is related, as is well known. to tlie filteringaction of the gill-rakers.In Figures 3 and 4 the development of the gillrakersin the larvae whose length ranges from 13.5to 90.0 mm is shown. The first sketches of the future
REPORTS POLGNE SI, 1 JU LY 1963 TO 30 JUKE 1966 77-1300.1400,1300.<strong>11</strong>00.<strong>11</strong>00.1000'q1eoo.c <strong>11</strong>00.X 1700'c1bOO.' 1500.he 1400'iaoor0 <strong>11</strong>00,g <strong>11</strong>00.0 e 1000.L-0 PQO'0 too.f roo.a0 bo0E 500f 400.5 300.gill-rakers appear as small protuberances on the firstbranchial arch, when the larva reaches a length of13.5 mm. In the larva whose length reaches 24 mm,the gill-rakers, of mhich there are about 20, reacha length of 315 p. Over the gill-rakers, some slightlynoticeable protuberances appear. These protuberanceswill transform themselres into the future denticles.In the larvae having a. length of 31 mm the gillrakers(about 32) reach a length of 720 and thenumber of protuberances corresponding to futuredenticles increases. As the larvae grow the gill-rakersalso increase rapidly in length, and they reach alength of 1,800 p in the larvae having a length of42 mm. At this stage the protuberances have becomedenticles. The juvenile haring a length of 50 mm hasapproximately 50 gill-rakers. which are slightly den-boo&f loo'1 100.30- 0 1Length of larvae in mm..width of the mouthhnge of prey widthFIGURE 2. Relationship between the width of the mouth and rangeof prey width in the anchovy larvae of different lengths.a b C d2FIGURE 4. Development of the gill-rakers in the larvae and juvenilesof the anchovy, showing the development of the denticles. The drawingscorrespond to the following lengths of fish: a-24.0 mm, b-31.0mm, c-50.0 mm, d 1 and d 2-90.0 mm.-Q b C 4 mm dFIGURE 3. Branchial arches of anchovy larvae, showing the appearanceand development of the gill-rakers. The drawings correspond tothe following lengths of fish: a-13.5 mm, b-18.2 mm, c-24.0 mm,d-31.0 mm, e-42.0 mm.ticled and have a length of about 2,250 p (Figures4c and 5a). The juvenile with a length of 90 mm hassome 90 denticled gill-rakers measuring 4,800 p inlength (Figures 4d and 5a).As is seen through this brief analysis of the developmentof the gill-rakers, the filtering apparatus of theanchovy begins to be functional by the time the larvaehave reached a length of 38 mm. Just at this stage ofdevelopment the small phytoplanktonic organismsbegin to appear in the diet, probably by having beenretained in the filtering net of the larvae. It can befurther assumed that the absence of phytoplanktersin the diet of the adult individuals of anchovies oflarger sizes is also related to changes which take placein the filtering apparatus, which could become acoarser filtering net because of the increase in thedistance between the gill-rakers, which is produced bythe growth of the branchial arch.
- Page 1 and 2:
STATE OF CALIFORNIAMARINE RESEARCH
- Page 3 and 4:
STATE OF CALIFORNIADEPARTMENT OF FI
- Page 5 and 6:
RONALD REAGAXGovcriwr of the Slate
- Page 7 and 8:
PART 1REVIEW OF ACTIVITIESJuly 1,19
- Page 9 and 10:
REPORTS YOLUAIE SI, 1 JULY 1963 TO
- Page 11 and 12:
REPORTS VOLUNE XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 13 and 14:
REPORTS YOLUME SI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 15 and 16:
REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 17 and 18:
REPORTS vor,uiwIi; SI, 1 JULY 1063
- Page 19 and 20:
REPORTS TOT2T71\IF: SI, 1 JUJIT 196
- Page 21 and 22:
IiEPOHTS TOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO
- Page 23 and 24:
REVIEW OF THE PELAGIC WET FISHERIES
- Page 25 and 26:
KEI'OiiTH TOLUJIE SI, 1 JULY 1963 T
- Page 27 and 28: REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 29 and 30: PART IISYMPOSIUM ON ANCHOVIES, GENU
- Page 31 and 32: OCEANIC ENVIRONMENTS OF THE GENUS E
- Page 33 and 34: KEI'OKTS VOLIXI.: SI, 1 JULY 1963 T
- Page 35 and 36: REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 37 and 38: REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 39 and 40: REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 41 and 42: ~~~REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 T
- Page 43 and 44: REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 45 and 46: REPORTS VOLUME SI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 47 and 48: 130'E 132' 134' 136' 138' 140' 142-
- Page 49 and 50: REPORTS VOLUSIE SI, 1 JULY 1963 TO
- Page 51 and 52: REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 53 and 54: REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 55 and 56: REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 57 and 58: KI3I’ORTH VOLUJIE XI, 1 JULY 1963
- Page 59 and 60: REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 61 and 62: REPORTS VOLUME SI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 63 and 64: REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 65 and 66: REPORTS VOLUIIE SI. 1 JULY 1963 TO
- Page 67 and 68: REPORTS T’OLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 T
- Page 69 and 70: INFLUENCE OF SOME ENVIRONMENTAL FAC
- Page 71 and 72: REPORTS Y‘OLUJIE XI, 1 JULY 1963
- Page 73 and 74: REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 75 and 76: ~table shows the values calculated
- Page 77: ateREPORTS T-OLTJIT", SI, 1 JULl 19
- Page 81 and 82: REPORTS VOLUXE XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 83 and 84: REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 85 and 86: _________--_____REPORTS VOLUJIE SI,
- Page 87 and 88: REPORTS TOLTIJIE SI, 1 JULY 1963 TO
- Page 89 and 90: -20/5-0 10-f 5-w 25-0 20-= 15-: 10-
- Page 91 and 92: REPORTS VOLUNE SI. 1 JULY 19G3 TO 3
- Page 93 and 94: REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 95 and 96: REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 97 and 98: REPORTS VOLURlE SI, 1 JULY 1963 TO
- Page 99 and 100: REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 101 and 102: REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 103 and 104: REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 105 and 106: REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 107 and 108: THE PREDATION OF GUANO BIRDS ON THE
- Page 109 and 110: iod and after 8 AM during the rest
- Page 111 and 112: REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 113 and 114: REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 115 and 116: FISH E RYThe California anchovy fis
- Page 117 and 118: ~~ ::REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963
- Page 119: CO-OCCURRENCES OF SARDINE AND ANCHO
- Page 122 and 123: 120 CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE OCEANIC
- Page 124 and 125: CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE OCEANlC FISH
- Page 126 and 127: 124 CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE OCEANIC
- Page 128 and 129:
126CALIFORNIB COOPERATIVE OCEANIC F
- Page 130 and 131:
128 CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE OCEANIC
- Page 132 and 133:
~~ ~130 CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE OCEA
- Page 134 and 135:
132 CALIF0RhTTIA COOPERATIVE OCEANI
- Page 136 and 137:
134 CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE OCEANIC
- Page 138 and 139:
THE ACCUMULATION OF FISH DEBRIS IN
- Page 140 and 141:
138 CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE OCEANIC
- Page 143 and 144:
PART IllSCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTIONS
- Page 145 and 146:
REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 147 and 148:
REPORTS VOLUME SI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 149 and 150:
REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 151 and 152:
REPORTS VOLU&IE XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO
- Page 153 and 154:
REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 155 and 156:
REPORTS VOLUME SI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 157 and 158:
SUMMARY OF THERMAL CONDITIONS AND P
- Page 159 and 160:
SEASONAL VARIATION OF TEMPERATURE A
- Page 161 and 162:
REPORTS VOLUME SI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 163 and 164:
including the semiannual harmonic?
- Page 165 and 166:
REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1983 TO 3
- Page 167 and 168:
REPORTS VOiLUME XI, 1 JULY 1983 TO
- Page 169:
REPORTS VOLUME XI, 1 JULY 1963 TO 3
- Page 172 and 173:
170 CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE OCWIC FI
- Page 174 and 175:
172 CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE OCBANIC
- Page 176 and 177:
174 CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE OCEANIC
- Page 178 and 179:
176 CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE OCEANIC
- Page 180 and 181:
178 CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE OCEANIC
- Page 182 and 183:
180 CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE OCEANIC
- Page 184 and 185:
182 CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE OCEANIC
- Page 186 and 187:
184CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE OCEANIC F
- Page 188 and 189:
186 CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE OCEANIC
- Page 190:
CONTENTSI. Review of Activities Pag