STF na MÃdia - MyClipp
STF na MÃdia - MyClipp
STF na MÃdia - MyClipp
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The New York Times/ - Politics, Seg, 16 de Abril de 2012<br />
CLIPPING INTERNACIONAL (Supreme Court)<br />
Keeping a Promise to Home Care Aides<br />
Evelyn Coke, who died in 2009 at age 74, was a home<br />
care aide whose case for fair pay went to the<br />
Supreme Court in 2007, where she lost 9 to 0. At<br />
issue were federal rules that define home care aides<br />
as “companions,” a label that exempts employers from<br />
having to pay minimum wage and time-and-a-half for<br />
overtime. The justices said that only Congress or the<br />
Labor Department could change the rules.Pauline<br />
Beck is a home care aide in California. In 2007,<br />
then-Se<strong>na</strong>tor Barack Obama was paired with Ms. Beck<br />
for an event called “Walk a Day in My Shoes,” in which<br />
he worked for a day at her job caring for an<br />
86-year-old amputee.<br />
Last Dec. 15, with Ms. Beck at his side, President<br />
Obama invoked Ms. Coke’s memory and announced,<br />
“Today, we’re guaranteeing home care workers<br />
minimum-wage and overtime pay protections.” He was<br />
referring to sensible new rules, proposed by the Labor<br />
Department, to revise the companionship exemption.<br />
The problem is that the new rules have yet to be<br />
fi<strong>na</strong>lized, and could still be derailed or watered down.<br />
The Labor Department has until the end of May to<br />
digest thousands of comments on its proposal. Most of<br />
the comments were supportive, including those from<br />
home care agencies that already adhere to fair pay<br />
laws, professio<strong>na</strong>l health associations, labor activists<br />
and advocates for the elderly. Opposition came mainly<br />
from for-profit home care franchisees — a growing<br />
segment in a traditio<strong>na</strong>lly nonprofit industry — who<br />
said that fair pay would devastate affordable home<br />
care. That is the same argument that prevailed in<br />
2002, when reforms proposed at the end of the Clinton<br />
administration were spiked.<br />
This time around, proponents for change have been<br />
better organized and armed with research to rebut<br />
such claims. But now as then, for-profit agencies have<br />
taken their complaints to the Small Business<br />
Administration, setting up a conflict with the Labor<br />
Department.<br />
Even if the new rules survive the Labor Department<br />
review intact, they must then be approved by the White<br />
House Office of Ma<strong>na</strong>gement and Budget, a process<br />
that could bog down in the face of interagency<br />
disagreements. It will take Mr. Obama’s engaged<br />
leadership to ensure that the long-overdue new rules,<br />
which offer basic fairness for home care aides, are<br />
carried out.<br />
164