04.12.2012 Views

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The New York Times/ ­- Politics, Seg, 16 de Abril de 2012<br />

CLIPPING INTERNACIONAL (Supreme Court)<br />

Keeping a Promise to Home Care Aides<br />

Evelyn Coke, who died in 2009 at age 74, was a home<br />

care aide whose case for fair pay went to the<br />

Supreme Court in 2007, where she lost 9 to 0. At<br />

issue were federal rules that define home care aides<br />

as “companions,” a label that exempts employers from<br />

having to pay minimum wage and time­-and­-a­-half for<br />

overtime. The justices said that only Congress or the<br />

Labor Department could change the rules.Pauline<br />

Beck is a home care aide in California. In 2007,<br />

then­-Se<strong>na</strong>tor Barack Obama was paired with Ms. Beck<br />

for an event called “Walk a Day in My Shoes,” in which<br />

he worked for a day at her job caring for an<br />

86­-year­-old amputee.<br />

Last Dec. 15, with Ms. Beck at his side, President<br />

Obama invoked Ms. Coke’s memory and announced,<br />

“Today, we’re guaranteeing home care workers<br />

minimum­-wage and overtime pay protections.” He was<br />

referring to sensible new rules, proposed by the Labor<br />

Department, to revise the companionship exemption.<br />

The problem is that the new rules have yet to be<br />

fi<strong>na</strong>lized, and could still be derailed or watered down.<br />

The Labor Department has until the end of May to<br />

digest thousands of comments on its proposal. Most of<br />

the comments were supportive, including those from<br />

home care agencies that already adhere to fair pay<br />

laws, professio<strong>na</strong>l health associations, labor activists<br />

and advocates for the elderly. Opposition came mainly<br />

from for­-profit home care franchisees — a growing<br />

segment in a traditio<strong>na</strong>lly nonprofit industry — who<br />

said that fair pay would devastate affordable home<br />

care. That is the same argument that prevailed in<br />

2002, when reforms proposed at the end of the Clinton<br />

administration were spiked.<br />

This time around, proponents for change have been<br />

better organized and armed with research to rebut<br />

such claims. But now as then, for­-profit agencies have<br />

taken their complaints to the Small Business<br />

Administration, setting up a conflict with the Labor<br />

Department.<br />

Even if the new rules survive the Labor Department<br />

review intact, they must then be approved by the White<br />

House Office of Ma<strong>na</strong>gement and Budget, a process<br />

that could bog down in the face of interagency<br />

disagreements. It will take Mr. Obama’s engaged<br />

leadership to ensure that the long­-overdue new rules,<br />

which offer basic fairness for home care aides, are<br />

carried out.<br />

164

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!