04.12.2012 Views

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Reuters: You've described these laws as part of a<br />

policy of "self­-deportation." What do you mean?<br />

Kobach: There's a false dichotomy that constantly<br />

emerges when you see politicians talking about<br />

immigration. They'll say you can't round up 11 million<br />

people and enforce the law 100 percent, so amnesty is<br />

the only ratio<strong>na</strong>l way to move forward. But no serious<br />

thinker would say those are the only two approaches<br />

to a law enforcement problem. The ratio<strong>na</strong>l solution is<br />

to ratchet up the level of enforcement. Then illegal<br />

aliens will self­-deport because the cost­-benefit<br />

calculation changes.<br />

Reuters: A study by the Center for Business &<br />

Economic Research at the University of Alabama<br />

found that Alabama's new immigration law will shrink<br />

the state economy by $2.3 billion and cost the state<br />

70,000 jobs. What do you think about the economic<br />

impact of the new immigration laws?<br />

Kobach: The Alabama study did not consider the huge<br />

fiscal burden illegal immigration is placing on Alabama<br />

taxpayers. The other factor that needs to be<br />

considered is the benefit of removing Americans from<br />

welfare rolls and allowing them to work. Once illegal<br />

aliens are removed from the labor market, wages will<br />

inevitably come up.<br />

Reuters: What's your own immigration story?<br />

Kobach: My great grandparents came from Norway<br />

and Germany and settled in Wisconsin. They were<br />

farmers for the most part. I'm a fourth­-generation<br />

American.<br />

Reuters: How did you become interested in<br />

Reuters General/ ­- Article, Seg, 16 de Abril de 2012<br />

CLIPPING INTERNACIONAL (Supreme Court)<br />

immigration reform?<br />

Kobach: One of the biggest epiphanies for me was the<br />

9/11 hijackings. I was working at the Justice<br />

Department for Attorney General John Ashcroft. All<br />

hijackers had come into the states legally, but five of<br />

the 19 became unlawfully present during their stays.<br />

Four of those five were apprehended by state and<br />

local police for traffic violations while they were in the<br />

country illegally. In none of those cases did the state or<br />

local officer have the information available to make an<br />

arrest and potentially foil the 9/11 plot. That realization<br />

was essential to my understanding of how critical<br />

federal and state cooperation is in this area.<br />

Reuters: What's the most influential law review article<br />

you've written?<br />

Kobach: In 2008, I published an article in the<br />

Georgetown Immigration Law Review, "Reinforcing the<br />

Rule of Law: What States Can and Should Do to<br />

Reduce Illegal Immigration." Arizo<strong>na</strong>'s SB 1070<br />

manifests many of the concepts that I prescribed in<br />

that article.<br />

Reuters: Has anything surprised you about how these<br />

laws have played out?<br />

Kobach: I didn't anticipate these state laws would<br />

become <strong>na</strong>tio<strong>na</strong>l issues in the way they have. I also<br />

never imaged the Justice Department would sue a<br />

state for trying to help the federal government enforce<br />

the law. That's never happened in American history<br />

before.<br />

(Reporting by Terry Baynes)<br />

158

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!