13.07.2015 Views

Birth to three matters - Communities and Local Government

Birth to three matters - Communities and Local Government

Birth to three matters - Communities and Local Government

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1996; Pugh et al 1994; Smith <strong>and</strong> Pugh1996; Smith 1996;Utting 1995; White <strong>and</strong>Woollett 1992).PRACTITIONERSMost of all, we conclude thatpractitioners need commitment.In order <strong>to</strong> be effective in theirrelationships with babies <strong>and</strong> youngchildren they need <strong>to</strong> be loving <strong>and</strong>knowledgeable, <strong>and</strong> because they workin positions of great responsibility, theyneed <strong>to</strong> be professional,accountable<strong>and</strong> trained in ways which keep theminformed about research <strong>and</strong> able <strong>to</strong>reflect on that research in the light oftheir own observations of children.As one practitioner in an Americanresearch report said:-‘I was at a party recently, whensomeone asked me what I did.“I’m aninves<strong>to</strong>r,” I said. People gathered roundme asking about s<strong>to</strong>cks, mutual funds,<strong>and</strong> so on. I explained that I wasn’tdealing with any of those products.“I’m investing in America’s future, ”I <strong>to</strong>ld them – “America’s children <strong>and</strong>their families.” Kay Mayo, Family ChildCare Provider Austin, TX’ Galinsky et al(1994:96).Practitioners require knowledge ofresearch about child developmentin order <strong>to</strong> be able <strong>to</strong> articulate whycertain practices are important.In particular they need information<strong>and</strong> training about young childrenwith special needs. This means theyneed time for that ongoing training.Support <strong>to</strong> develop more effectiveinter-agency working in the interestsof young children <strong>and</strong> their families.(The main fac<strong>to</strong>rs relating <strong>to</strong> thiseffectiveness are detailed in Atkinsonet al 2002).POLICY MAKERSEvangelou <strong>and</strong> Sylva (2002) reported onthe evaluation of the PEEP (Peers EarlyEducation Partnership) based in Oxford.The project, which involves work withadults (parents, carers <strong>and</strong> pre-schoolstaff) who live <strong>and</strong> work with some 2,000children from birth <strong>to</strong> five years in an areaof low socio-economic status, set out <strong>to</strong>effect positive change in educationalachievement, especially in literacy. Theresearchers found that the project didindeed have a positive effect on children’sliteracy, numeracy <strong>and</strong> self-esteem butthat at this time it is impossible <strong>to</strong> claimthat there will be long term gains.As Brooks-Gunn (2000:12) has argued,‘If policy makers believe that offering earlychildhood intervention for two years oreven <strong>three</strong> will permanently <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong>tallyreduce SES disparities in children’sachievements, they may be engagingin magical thinking’Thus, with this research in mind, <strong>to</strong>getherwith that reviewed earlier, we concludethat policy makers’ priorities must be:-141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!