f rom such an approach can be t ter ident i f yi nte rve ntion proce d u re s, for ex a m p l e.Thus the implications for children withspecial needs are that interventionprogrammes should be fine tuned <strong>to</strong>ensure maximum stimulation for thoseaspects, sensory, physical or intellectual,<strong>to</strong> enable the synapses <strong>to</strong> form/connect.Babies’ brains develop at an as<strong>to</strong>nishingpace in the early years. Brains aregenetically wired at birth, but the complexcircuitry that permits mature thoughtprocesses <strong>to</strong> occur only begins <strong>to</strong> developin early childhood, <strong>and</strong> connectionscontinue <strong>to</strong> be made throughout life, <strong>and</strong>are shaped by experience.The human brain begins its lifelong,developmental journey in the womb; bythe end of the first month the humanfoetus already has a primitive brain which,by nine months’ gestation has formedvirtually all of the neurons that it is everlikely <strong>to</strong> have (Greenfield 1997).It is now known that a baby’s brain is notfully developed at birth, although it arrivesin the world with most, if not all,of itsneurons in place <strong>and</strong> with someconnections between them (synapses)that have permitted basic foetalmovement in the womb, <strong>and</strong> subsequentlyallow vital <strong>and</strong> reflex functions <strong>to</strong> occurneonatally. While a newborn,or neonate’s,brain still has a long way <strong>to</strong> go on itsdevelopmental journey, it is not ‘empty’or inactive. At birth,the process of wiringup synaptic connections (calledsynap<strong>to</strong>genesis) continues <strong>and</strong>accelerates. Webb et al (2001) reviewin neurological detail the process ofpostnatal neuroana<strong>to</strong>mical change <strong>and</strong>its implications for behaviour, <strong>and</strong> theyemphasise that brain development ischaracterised by two main periods, thefirst beginning at conception, <strong>and</strong> thesecond during gestation (the lattercontinuing for up <strong>to</strong> two decades).They observe that many researchers(such as Goldman-Racik 1987; Katz <strong>and</strong>Shatz 1997 cited in Webb et al 2001) haveproposed that early brain developmentinvolves a huge overproduction ofsynaptic connections; some of theseconnections will become redundant <strong>and</strong>are subsequently ‘pruned’ away.Connections that have been repeatedlyused tend <strong>to</strong> be retained, those that havenot been used often are shed. Pruning inthe brain,much as in the garden, not onlyeliminates circuits that are surplus <strong>to</strong>requirements, but also allows theremaining circuits <strong>to</strong> grow bigger <strong>and</strong>stronger. The metaphor of plant growthwas used by Diamond <strong>and</strong> Hopkins (1998)in their synthesis of early brain research<strong>and</strong> information on children’s playfulactivity, Magic Trees of the Mind. A detailedexplanation of the processes ofsynap<strong>to</strong>genesis, synaptic pruning canbe found in Bruer (1997). He also discussesthe ‘windows of opportunity’ otherwiseknown as ‘critical periods’ in braindevelopment. Greenough, Black <strong>and</strong>Wallace (1987) have described t h e s epe ri od s, s aying that ‘it is as if evo l u t i o nhas resulted in neural systems t h at ex pe ct<strong>to</strong> find ce rtain kinds of stimuli in the111
environment in order <strong>to</strong> fine-tune theirperformance (reported in Bruer, 1987:7).The ‘Brainwonders’ website defines criticalperiods as developmental phases that aredependent upon environmental input; itadds that there are differing criticalperiods for ‘the presence of certainnutrients…for certain types of sensorystimuli (such as vision <strong>and</strong> speech sounds),<strong>and</strong> for certain emotional <strong>and</strong> cognitiveexperiences (attachment, languageexposure)’. However, it is also made clearthat ‘there are mental skills, such asreading, vocabulary size, <strong>and</strong> the ability<strong>to</strong> see colour, which do not appear <strong>to</strong> passthrough tight critical periods in theirdevelopment.’ However, yet again therehave been disagreements about thepossible existence of such periods inhuman development. Blakemore (2002: 28)writes that ‘Most neuroscientists nowbelieve that critical periods are not rigid<strong>and</strong> inflexible. Rather, most interpret themas ‘sensitive’ periods.’ Those who believedin the existence of critical periods set inmotion ‘a plethora of videos <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong>ysclaiming <strong>to</strong> ‘boost’ your baby’s brain,<strong>and</strong>implying beneficial long term effects…such claims currently have scantneuroscience backing, <strong>and</strong> should betreated with caution.’ (Johnson 2002:42).But this does not mean we should treatbabies as if they have no brain nor youngchildren as if they cannot benefit fromeducation (in its broadest sense – notformal schooling) until they are admitted<strong>to</strong> school, as one Times edi<strong>to</strong>rial claimednot long ago, suggesting that the purposeof nursery provision is simply <strong>to</strong> preparechildren,so that ‘the reception class canbegin the proper process of education.’(The Times 1995:17).Importantly, Johnson (2002: 40-41 – ouritalics) draws attention <strong>to</strong> the fact that‘babies brains have sometimes beenviewed as being passively shaped by theirenvironment…because over the first fewmonths they are unable <strong>to</strong> walk or evenreach accurately. Appearances can bedeceiving however. We have seen, forinstance, how, from birth, infants arecapable of directing their eyes <strong>to</strong>wardthings that interest them, such as faces.’This comment sums up the traditionalEnglish view reflected in the saying‘children should be seen <strong>and</strong> not heard’<strong>and</strong> the fact that adults, including youngparents, in Engl<strong>and</strong> who have publicconversations with babies are often lookedat askance. Perhaps one outcome of the‘<strong>Birth</strong> <strong>to</strong> Three Matters’ project would bethe promotion of joyful, publicconversation between babies <strong>and</strong> youngchildren <strong>and</strong> their carers in shops, streets,everywhere, <strong>to</strong> push home the messagethat children have brains that are trying <strong>to</strong>make sense of the world from the momen<strong>to</strong>f birth. It is in sharing these ordinaryencounters that brain development ispromoted as well as other aspects such asemotional attachment <strong>and</strong> self-esteem,aswe have already discussed.Neuroscience has started <strong>to</strong> map out theways in which young brains make theconnections that are the key <strong>to</strong> eachindividual child’s mind.112 EDUCATIONAND SKILLS B I RT H T O T H R E E M AT T E R S
- Page 2:
AcknowledgementsThe authors and pub
- Page 6 and 7:
Relationships with other people (bo
- Page 8:
policies for families. So this lite
- Page 12:
etween three and nine years old whi
- Page 16 and 17:
0 - 8 months: Heads Up, Lookers and
- Page 18 and 19:
e a rliest ye a r s’ 1 , is the c
- Page 20 and 21:
distinguish between things, and tha
- Page 22 and 23:
Chapter 2Influential research and t
- Page 24 and 25:
THE ISSUE OF THEORIES AS CULTURALCO
- Page 26 and 27:
p a rt i c u l a rly in re l ation
- Page 28 and 29:
developed by Bereiter and Engelmann
- Page 30 and 31:
familiar settings. By about one yea
- Page 32 and 33:
child as learning and developing in
- Page 34 and 35:
are important to them,blanking out
- Page 36 and 37:
THEORIES ABOUT EARLY CHILDHOODEDUCA
- Page 38 and 39:
Chapter 3A Strong ChildIn the Frame
- Page 40 and 41:
A GROWING AWARENESS OF SELF AND THE
- Page 42 and 43:
( a d a p ted from Davies 1999 : 12
- Page 44 and 45:
them with an inadequate modelof rew
- Page 46 and 47:
However, even sensitive parents and
- Page 48 and 49:
It is preferable to have stabilityi
- Page 50 and 51:
something surprising and strangehap
- Page 52 and 53:
when someone else is upset or hurt,
- Page 54 and 55:
main factors enabling such self-ass
- Page 56 and 57:
demonstrate achievements - ‘Go on
- Page 58 and 59:
implications for siblings, which ar
- Page 60 and 61: with friends fared be t ter than th
- Page 62 and 63: Attending to external demands (such
- Page 64 and 65: Chapter 4A Skilful CommunicatorThis
- Page 66 and 67: elationships with close and protect
- Page 68 and 69: adults and siblings around them. Th
- Page 70 and 71: interactions and interchanges depen
- Page 72 and 73: in the first 18 months. Depressed m
- Page 74 and 75: Karmiloff-Smith 2001: 183). Further
- Page 76 and 77: then language grows in a safe and f
- Page 78 and 79: ‘language’. However, there is m
- Page 80 and 81: of his granddaughter Alice’s very
- Page 82 and 83: For example, Eliot (just two years
- Page 84 and 85: Chapter 5A Competent LearnerA Compe
- Page 86 and 87: understandings was crucial. They sh
- Page 88 and 89: still gave them biscuits, because t
- Page 90 and 91: The importance of social interactio
- Page 92 and 93: a fast-moving sce n e. When the pro
- Page 94 and 95: exploratory and affective nature of
- Page 96 and 97: with image (the image of a letter)
- Page 98 and 99: in the literacy life of his three y
- Page 100 and 101: Being CreativeYoung babies explore
- Page 102 and 103: Chapter 6A Healthy ChildA Healthy C
- Page 104 and 105: FIGURE 1:SIX ASPECTS OF HEALTH (MEG
- Page 106 and 107: It is only by being given oppo rtun
- Page 108 and 109: developmental psychology and earlye
- Page 112 and 113: It has also provided useful insight
- Page 114 and 115: FIGURE 2:SHORE’S (1997:18) CHART
- Page 116 and 117: dysfunction is one of the leadinghy
- Page 118 and 119: memory; synapses associated withexp
- Page 120 and 121: cognitive development of the childr
- Page 122 and 123: ejection - when it is primary - is
- Page 124 and 125: of control through safe exploration
- Page 126 and 127: greater risk) and girls halved betw
- Page 128 and 129: et al 2000). Further, lone mothers,
- Page 130 and 131: ecoming securely attached (Seifer a
- Page 132 and 133: (Whipple 1999);training projects fo
- Page 134 and 135: As we have found over and over agai
- Page 136 and 137: disseminate effective practicerespe
- Page 138 and 139: Chapter 7Conclusions and implicatio
- Page 140 and 141: 1996; Pugh et al 1994; Smith and Pu
- Page 142 and 143: Finally, in this review of the rese
- Page 144 and 145: meaning making. Paper presented at
- Page 146 and 147: Pre-school Program on Youths throug
- Page 148 and 149: Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) The Ecolo
- Page 150 and 151: for intervention. In B.B. Lahey and
- Page 152 and 153: children. In J. Bruner and H. Haste
- Page 154 and 155: Fawcett, A. (2001) Special Educatio
- Page 156 and 157: Grainger, T. and Goouch,K. (1999) Y
- Page 158 and 159: Howes, C. (1987) Peer interaction o
- Page 160 and 161:
months Journal of Reproductive and
- Page 162 and 163:
Mandler, J. (1999) Preverbal repres
- Page 164 and 165:
Mo r s s, J . ( 1990) The Bi o l og
- Page 166 and 167:
Patel, P., Mendall, M.A., Khulusi,
- Page 168 and 169:
Roberts, H. (2001a) Fit or fat? Coo
- Page 170 and 171:
Singer, E. (1992) Child Care and th
- Page 172 and 173:
Teti, D.M.and Gelfand, D.M. (1991)B
- Page 174:
Issues in the Early Years London:Pa
- Page 177 and 178:
National Association for SpecialEdu
- Page 179 and 180:
PEOPLE FOCUSED continued/setting fo
- Page 181 and 182:
BIRTH TO THREE MATTERSPro Forma for
- Page 183:
184 EDUCATIONAND SKILLS B I RT H T