13.07.2015 Views

The Little Ice Age and Neutral Faunal Assemblages - Ontario ...

The Little Ice Age and Neutral Faunal Assemblages - Ontario ...

The Little Ice Age and Neutral Faunal Assemblages - Ontario ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CAMPBELL & CAMPBELL: LITTLE ICE AGE 17FIGURE 4Number of <strong>Neutral</strong> sites with faunal analyses plotted through time.records of proxy data such as oxygen Isotope curvesfrom glacier ice-cores on Devon Isl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> treeringdata from California. He concludes that "aprotracted <strong>Little</strong> <strong>Ice</strong> <strong>Age</strong> cooling took place after caAD 1200 <strong>and</strong> growing season temperatures reached1°C below the 1931-1960 mean in the 1700s." <strong>The</strong>correlation with other sites around the worldsuggests that the LIA was an essentiallysynchronous global phenomenon.Gajewski (1987) uses statistical methods to interpretthe palynology of seven lakes across the northeasternUnited States. He finds that a warm periodoccurred between AD 1000 <strong>and</strong> 1200, <strong>and</strong> a coolerperiod from AD 1450 to 1850, corresponding withLamb's (1977) dates for the LIA. For purposes ofour paper, the dates ca. AD 1450-1850 have beenadopted for the LIA; however, time lags in responseto changing conditions may have varied dependingon individual circumstances of site locations.Several authors use different dates for the LIA; this isto be expected since the change was gradual ratherthan abrupt.<strong>Neutral</strong> HorticultureDespite the growing number of plant macrofossilanalyses in <strong>Ontario</strong> (Crawford, 1987; Fecteau,1985; Ounjan, in prep.), the available data are noteasy to interpret beyond simply noting the presenceor absence of particular species. <strong>The</strong>re is little doubtthat corn, beans, <strong>and</strong> other cultigens were abundantafter at least AD 1350; the question is how importantwere they to the <strong>Neutral</strong> diet. It is difficult todetermine this from plant macrofossil data alone, asa change in the relative importance of horticulturalproduce need not affect the ratios in which thevarious crops were produced. <strong>The</strong> increase in thenumber of horticultural village sites through time(Fecteau 1985) suggests either an increased relianceon horticulture or, more likely, a populationincrease among horticulturalists. A correspondingincrease in the number of sites which have beenanalyzed for faunal material can be seen in the datapresented in this paper (Fig. 4).In the absence of any direct palaeoethnobotanicalindication of change in <strong>Neutral</strong> plant use over time,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!