June - the Free Presbyterian church of Scotland
June - the Free Presbyterian church of Scotland
June - the Free Presbyterian church of Scotland
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
44 FI'ee Pl'esbyterian Magazine.<strong>of</strong> bre<strong>the</strong>rn but we have guidance from an unerring sourco asto our conduct in this matter. Perhaps none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> disciplosgave more wonderful testimony to <strong>the</strong> Deity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son oe Godthan Peter and we dare not doubt but Christ loved hilll yotnone <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m, with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Betrayer, got such acrushing rebuke--" Get behind me, Satan; thou art an o('[ellceunto me; for thou savourest not <strong>the</strong> things that be <strong>of</strong> God butthose that be <strong>of</strong> men" (Matt. xvi. 23). Who will dare to saythat this severe rebuke was incompatible with a love that wasstronger than death. Paul's love to <strong>the</strong> saints did not sealhis lips when Peter acted contrary to <strong>the</strong> truth and in all <strong>the</strong>writings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Apostles <strong>the</strong>re is perhaps no more severe rebukes<strong>of</strong> sinful courses than we have in <strong>the</strong> Epistles <strong>of</strong> John, <strong>the</strong>Apostle <strong>of</strong> love, who wrote so impressively on this grace. One<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> severest letters we remember reading was <strong>the</strong> one writtenby <strong>the</strong> saintly and gentle Robert Murray MacCheyne to Mr.Alexander MacNeill when he moved for <strong>the</strong> running <strong>of</strong> trainson <strong>the</strong> Sabbath for <strong>the</strong> first time in <strong>Scotland</strong>. So it is evidentbro<strong>the</strong>rly love is quite compatible with faithful dealing <strong>of</strong> erringbre<strong>the</strong>rn and stern denunciation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ways <strong>of</strong> lawless men.In administering necessary rebuke we are not forgetful thatin some minds <strong>the</strong>y see no distinction between mere censoriousnessand faithful dealing with <strong>the</strong> erring. But <strong>the</strong> two are <strong>of</strong>different origins and <strong>the</strong>ir fmits are different. Censoriousnesi:lhas not in view <strong>the</strong> improvement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> censured. In manycases it strikes to wound and drenches <strong>the</strong> whole course or naturewith its poison. It is not so with faithful rebukes administeredin bro<strong>the</strong>rly love-" Open rebuke is better than secret love.Faithful are <strong>the</strong> wounds <strong>of</strong> a friend; but <strong>the</strong> kisses <strong>of</strong> an enemyare deceitful" (Provs. xxvii. 5, 6). The two <strong>the</strong>n are quitedistinct though some whose minds have got unaccountably mixedup are ready to call faithful bro<strong>the</strong>rly dealing as "<strong>the</strong> religion<strong>of</strong> miscalling." If <strong>the</strong>re is such a religion <strong>the</strong> New Testamentin <strong>the</strong> Gospels and <strong>the</strong> Epistles is very full <strong>of</strong> it. If it istrue that it takes great grace to receive a rebuke in <strong>the</strong> rightspirit it requires no less graee to give it for if our own temper