13.07.2015 Views

2009 CAUTI guidelines - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

2009 CAUTI guidelines - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

2009 CAUTI guidelines - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Development of Key QuestionsWe first conducted an electronic search of the National Guideline Clearinghouse® (Agency <strong>for</strong>Healthcare Research <strong>and</strong> Quality), Medline® (National Library of Medicine) using the Ovid®Plat<strong>for</strong>m (Ovid Technologies, Wolters Kluwer, New York, NY), the Cochrane® HealthTechnology Assessment Database (Cochrane Collaboration, Ox<strong>for</strong>d, UK), the NIH ConsensusDevelopment Program, <strong>and</strong> the United States Preventive Services Task Force database <strong>for</strong>existing national <strong>and</strong> international <strong>guidelines</strong> relevant to <strong>CAUTI</strong>. The strategy used <strong>for</strong> theguideline search <strong>and</strong> the search results can be found in Appendix 1A. A preliminary list of keyquestions was developed from a review of the relevant <strong>guidelines</strong> identified in the search. 1,35,36Key questions were finalized after vetting them with a panel of content experts <strong>and</strong> HICPACmembers.Literature SearchFollowing the development of the key questions, search terms were developed <strong>for</strong> identifyingliterature relevant to the key questions. For the purposes of quality assurance, we comparedthese terms to those used in relevant seminal studies <strong>and</strong> <strong>guidelines</strong>. These search terms werethen incorporated into search strategies <strong>for</strong> the relevant electronic databases. Searches wereper<strong>for</strong>med in Medline® (National Library of Medicine) using the Ovid® Plat<strong>for</strong>m (OvidTechnologies, Wolters Kluwer, New York, NY), EMBASE® (Elsevier BV, Amsterdam,Netherl<strong>and</strong>s), CINAHL® (Ebsco Publishing, Ipswich, MA) <strong>and</strong> Cochrane® (CochraneCollaboration, Ox<strong>for</strong>d, UK) (all databases were searched in July 2007), <strong>and</strong> the resultingreferences were imported into a reference manager, where duplicates were resolved. ForCochrane reviews ultimately included in our guideline, we checked <strong>for</strong> updates in July 2008.The detailed search strategy used <strong>for</strong> identifying primary literature <strong>and</strong> the results of the searchcan be found in Appendix 1B.Study SelectionTitles <strong>and</strong> abstracts from references were screened by a single author (C.V.G, R.K.A., orD.A.P.) <strong>and</strong> the full text articles were retrieved if they were 1) relevant to one or more keyquestions, 2) primary analytic research, systematic reviews or meta-analyses, <strong>and</strong> 3) written inEnglish. Likewise, the full-text articles were screened by a single author (C.V.G. or D.A.P.) usingthe same criteria, <strong>and</strong> included studies underwent a second review <strong>for</strong> inclusion by anotherauthor (R.K.A.). Disagreements were resolved by the remaining authors. The results of thisprocess are depicted in Figure 2.27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!