Presentation
Presentation Presentation
ReferencesNC Water AWWA JAM WEA 2010 20111) Cliburn, Mike. 2008. Invent Mixer Evaluation. Technical Memorandum. Boyle2) Invent. Hyperclassic Mixing and Aeration System.3) Randall, C.W. and W.O. Randall. 2010. A Comparative Analysis of Bio M x System and a SubmersiblePropeller Mixer: Mixing in Aerobic Zones at the F. Wayne Hill Water Resources Center, Buford,Georgia.4) McManus, Glen and Randy Boyette. A Comparative Biological Treatment Analysis of a BioMix Systemand a Submersible Propeller Mixer Operating in an Anoxic Zone. Renewable Water Resources.5) Metcalf and Eddy. 2003. Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse. Fourth Edition. McGraw Hill.6) Oton, Sonia M., Gidugu, Srinivas D., Carroll, Janice R., Saurer, Paul D., Fillos, John, Ramalingam,Krish, Kharkar, Salil M., Minassian, Rouben Der, Osit, Matthew S., Solimando, Daniel A., Deur, Allen.2009. The Fine Line Between Thorough Mixing and Energy Consumption. Hazen and Sawyer, P.C.DC Water and Sewer Authority. NYC Department of Environmental Protection.7) Philadelphia Mixing Solutions. Anoxic Mixing White Paper.8) Pulsair System, INC. 2011. Municipal Wastewater Applications.9) Technical Memorandum No.8F-FINAL Mixer Evaluation for BNR Basins 1-6. 2009. Hazen and Sawyer.City of Tallahassee.10) USEPA. 2010. Evaluation of Energy Conservation Measures for Wastewater Treatment Facilities.832-R-10-005.11) Wray, Jared. 2012. Mixing Things Up: Large Blade, Slow Speed Wastewater Mixing TechnologiesGain Recognition for Providing Solid Performance with Low-Energy Usage. Treatment Plant Operator.
The Authors Would Like to Thank:§ Mark Messere – Hazen and Sawyer§ Greg Everhart – Combs & Associates, Inc.§ Gary Broome – Heyward Incorporated§ Roger Wright – Atlantic Process Sales, LLC§ Stuart Humphries – EnviroMix§ Teresa Sullivan – Invent§ Skip Brunhaver – Pulsair§ Jason Beck – CDM SmithNC Water AWWA JAM WEA 2010 2011
- Page 1 and 2: Mixing Alternatives Evaluation and
- Page 3: AgendaI. Why mix in BNR basins?II.
- Page 8 and 9: Jet MixkLa SystemsTZO WRF Mixing Pu
- Page 10 and 11: Hyperboloid Mixing—Pilots and Ins
- Page 12 and 13: Big Bubble Mixing§ Components:§ C
- Page 14 and 15: Big Bubble MixingNozzlesAirHeaderAc
- Page 16 and 17: Cost Evaluation Assumptions§ All c
- Page 18 and 19: Results: Net Present Worth$14,000,0
- Page 20 and 21: Results: Energy Consumption1.57 72H
- Page 24 and 25: Water JAM 2010 2011Questions
ReferencesNC Water AWWA JAM WEA 2010 20111) Cliburn, Mike. 2008. Invent Mixer Evaluation. Technical Memorandum. Boyle2) Invent. Hyperclassic Mixing and Aeration System.3) Randall, C.W. and W.O. Randall. 2010. A Comparative Analysis of Bio M x System and a SubmersiblePropeller Mixer: Mixing in Aerobic Zones at the F. Wayne Hill Water Resources Center, Buford,Georgia.4) McManus, Glen and Randy Boyette. A Comparative Biological Treatment Analysis of a BioMix Systemand a Submersible Propeller Mixer Operating in an Anoxic Zone. Renewable Water Resources.5) Metcalf and Eddy. 2003. Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse. Fourth Edition. McGraw Hill.6) Oton, Sonia M., Gidugu, Srinivas D., Carroll, Janice R., Saurer, Paul D., Fillos, John, Ramalingam,Krish, Kharkar, Salil M., Minassian, Rouben Der, Osit, Matthew S., Solimando, Daniel A., Deur, Allen.2009. The Fine Line Between Thorough Mixing and Energy Consumption. Hazen and Sawyer, P.C.DC Water and Sewer Authority. NYC Department of Environmental Protection.7) Philadelphia Mixing Solutions. Anoxic Mixing White Paper.8) Pulsair System, INC. 2011. Municipal Wastewater Applications.9) Technical Memorandum No.8F-FINAL Mixer Evaluation for BNR Basins 1-6. 2009. Hazen and Sawyer.City of Tallahassee.10) USEPA. 2010. Evaluation of Energy Conservation Measures for Wastewater Treatment Facilities.832-R-10-005.11) Wray, Jared. 2012. Mixing Things Up: Large Blade, Slow Speed Wastewater Mixing TechnologiesGain Recognition for Providing Solid Performance with Low-Energy Usage. Treatment Plant Operator.