13.07.2015 Views

REPORT - The Township of Uxbridge

REPORT - The Township of Uxbridge

REPORT - The Township of Uxbridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

small area between the EP Zone and Maple Brook Drive is in the “Hamlet Residential (HR)Zone”. <strong>The</strong> permitted uses in the RU Zone include:a single detached dwelling;a converted dwelling house;conservation, forestry and reforestation; and,a farm or nursery farm and greenhouse.<strong>The</strong> permitted uses in the EP Zone include a range <strong>of</strong> low intensity uses such as:conservation, agriculture, forestry, reforestation, bird sanctuaries, wildlife reserves, orother similar passive uses which provide for the preservation and management <strong>of</strong> thenatural environment;a farm exclusive <strong>of</strong> any buildings or structures;flood, erosion and siltation control works; and,a public park.<strong>The</strong> primary permitted use in the HR Zone is a single detached dwelling.In addition, accessory uses, buildings and structures are permitted in all three zones.It should be noted that the R2-17 Zone is applicable to the homes on Cyril Richardson Courtbacking onto the subject lands. That zone permits single family, semi-detached and duplexdwelling houses and establishes a minimum rear yard requirement <strong>of</strong> 8 metres among otherregulations.AGENCY AND PUBLIC CONSULTATION :Agency CommentsRegion <strong>of</strong> Durham<strong>The</strong> Regional Planning Department in their comments <strong>of</strong> February 23, 2012 indicates that thezoning amendment is permitted by the Regional Official Plan and that the Region has noobjection to the rezoning. <strong>The</strong>y note that any outstanding matters or requirements may beaddressed as conditions <strong>of</strong> draft approval in the condominium application process.Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority<strong>The</strong> Authority provided comments on February 1, 2011 which identified some matters whichwere required to be addressed as part <strong>of</strong> the conceptual approval, while the remainder <strong>of</strong> thecomments could be addressed as part <strong>of</strong> the detailed design (plan <strong>of</strong> condominium). <strong>The</strong>majority <strong>of</strong> the comments related to stormwater management. A further letter dated July 21,2011 indicated that the Authority had no objection to the approval <strong>of</strong> the plan <strong>of</strong> condominium7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!