REPORT - The Township of Uxbridge

Appendix DPublic Submission ReviewSubmission Discussion ConclusionIssue 1: Access/Traffic1.1 Nicole Banich, 56 Apple Tree Cres.Has anyone checked “theimpact of having a street comeon to Oakside, which is up aslope and a slight bend? Thiswill be a hazard, particularlywith winter conditions..”“if there is to be constructionwhere are all the cars, trucksand vans of the workers goingto park? On Oakside andMapleBrook, making driving anightmare through that area.”The Township’s engineeringconsultants have reviewed thetraffic submissions includinginformation on sight lines andare satisfied with the proposedaccess.The issue of construction trafficcan be controlled by theTownship to minimize impactson the residents.1.2 David Pilote and Charlene Summerfield, 14 Cyril Richardson Court“The number of housesproposed are too many forsuch a small area and thetraffic onto the existing road(Oakside Drive) was notdesigned for this.”See 1.1 See 1.11.3 Eileen and Chris Ethier, 12 Cyril Richardson Court“The following issues concernus and should be fully addressbefore or if this developmentis permitted...See 1.1 See 1.1traffic/safety issueregarding proposed roadlocation”1.4 Patrick Oliver, 10 Cyril Richardson Court“Increase of traffic at least 32cars in and out daily! Theexisting street is already verybusy.See 1.1 See 1.12. Drainage2.1 Nicole Banich, 56 Apple Tree Cres.-“The city still has notaddressed the conditions of thebackyards on Apple Tree.Because the street slopes,those yards are breedingThe developer has prepared astormwater management reportwhich addresses drainage issues.The Township engineeringconsultant is satisfied with theProposed access is consideredappropriate by Township’sengineering consultant.That approval of aconstruction trafficmanagement plan be acondition of approval.The drainage issue will befurther reviewed as part ofdetailed design through theapproval of the draft plan ofcondominium.D-1