REPORT - The Township of Uxbridge

REPORT - The Township of Uxbridge REPORT - The Township of Uxbridge

town.uxbridge.on.ca
from town.uxbridge.on.ca More from this publisher
13.07.2015 Views

Appendix BTownship Official Plan ReviewPolicy Discussion Conclusionareas.2.5.5.3.3 DensityThe overall average density for newdevelopment shall be approximately 12units per net hectare with a maximumdensity of 17 units per net hectare.However, limited areas of medium densityshall be permitted to a maximum density of35 units per net hectare.2.5.5.3.4 HeightThe maximum height is three storeys.Section 2.6 Transportation Strategy2.6.2.1 i) and iv) establishes that roads willconform to designations on Schedule “A”and Table2.3 unless otherwise determinedby the Township or the Region.2.6.3.1 i) Sidewalks are required on oneside of local roads.2.6.3.2 Trail SystemThe existing system shall be expanded overtime. Schedule B identifies a trailconnection through the subject lands.2.6.6.2 Adequate off street parking isrequired as a condition of development.Section 2.7 Development Review2.7.2 The policies of the section establishbackground information and criteria forapproval of applications but that whereinformation is not applicable the Townshipmay modify or eliminate the requirementor requirements.The subject lands have proposeddensity of approximately 6 units pernet hectare for the entire site and 20units per net hectare for the tableland.Proposed units appear to be twostoreys based on concepts.The proposed development is aresidential condominium and as suchthe road system will be maintained bythe condominium corporation. Atraffic impact study has been carriedout and the Township’s engineeringconsultants are satisfied with theconcept as proposed as a basis forconsidering the Official Plan andZoning by-law amendment.A pedestrian walkway is proposedalong the road in the development toconnect up to a trail through theoverland flow route which will connectwith a trail in the valley.See discussion Section 2.3.12Development shall be required to meetzoning bylaw parking requirement of aminimum of two parking spaces perunit. Two car garages are proposedwhich would allow for a potential of 4parking spaces. In addition, some onstreet parking should also be available.The application is for a zoning bylawamendment and a plan ofcondominium. However, this report isconsidering on the rezoningapplication, as such the same level ofdetail for the background work whichwould be necessary for a plan ofcondominium is not required.Development conformswith density requirement.Development is less thanmaximum permitted height.Maximum height of twostoreys should beestablished in zoningbylaw.The proposed conceptualroad system is appropriateas a basis for the currentapplications.Provision should be madefor pedestrian walkway inthe development.Creation of the trail linksshould be a condition ofany approval.Development will berequired to meet zoningbylaw minimum parkingstandards.Background worksubmitted satisfiedTownship and agencyrequirements for arezoning.B-7

Appendix BTownship Official Plan ReviewPolicy Discussion Conclusion2.7.4 Information Requirements Background worksubmitted satisfiedTownship and agencyrequirements for arezoning.2.7.5 Development Evaluation Criteriarequires general conformity with a numberof criteria:i) Design - To be evaluated in accordancewith 2.4. “In particular, where newdevelopment is proposed abutting existingresidential development it shall be designedto be compatible with that existingdevelopment with respect to scale andmassing. Adequate buffering will also beprovided.”2.7.5 ii) Heritage Preservation requires thatstandard archaeological potential criteria beused to evaluate future development areas.2.7.5 iii) Natural Heritage System Indicatesthat any development in the EnvironmentalConstraint and Forest Area designationsmust conform to policies of Section 2.3. Inaddition, all development is to be evaluatedwith respect to conformity with Section 2.3.2.7.5 iv) Watercourses requireswatercourses to be maintained or enhancedtogether with lands immediately adjacentto same.The design of the development conceptis generally compatible with theadjacent existing residentialdevelopment. Development consists ofsingle detached dwellings similar inscale to the adjacent single detacheddwellings. The buildings are similar inheight taking into account thedifferences in grade. However,careful consideration is required of therelationship where the proposed newunits back onto existing developmentincluding the specific setback from theproperty line to ensure an appropriaterelationship between the existingdevelopment and the proposeddevelopment. Siting of buildings, thedesign of the rear façade, the depth ofthe rear yard and landscaping will haveto be carefully considered to minimizeloss of privacy.The applicant has prepared a Phase 1-2archaeological study which indicatedthat no archaeological resources wereencountered on the site and that itshould be considered as cleared of anyrequirement for further archaeologicalfieldwork.The applicant has submitted anEnvironmental Impact Study andaddendum and other related studiesincluding a geomorphic and meanderbelt width analysis and stormwaterDevelopment generallysatisfies criteria. Howevercareful consideration willhave to be given in theZoning By-law to theminimum building setback.Landscaping and anyadditional fencingrequirements will berequired to be establishedthrough the zoning bylawand condominiumapproval. A detailedgrading plan to minimizegrades adjacent to existinghomes will be required aspart of the plan ofcondominium.The application conformsto this policy.The application conformsto these policies subject tothe conditions to beestablished through thezoning bylaw and plan ofcondominium.analysis. The application has beenevaluated by the Township and theLSRCA with respect to the lands in theEnvironmental Constraint and ForestArea designations and the UxbridgeBrook and the development has beendeemed appropriate subject toconditions to be established throughthe zoning bylaw and plan ofcondominium including the zoning oflands to be protected in anEnvironmental Protection Zone.2.7.5v) Sewer and Water Services and See discussion of 2.2B-8

Appendix B<strong>Township</strong> Official Plan ReviewPolicy Discussion Conclusion2.7.4 Information Requirements Background worksubmitted satisfied<strong>Township</strong> and agencyrequirements for arezoning.2.7.5 Development Evaluation Criteriarequires general conformity with a number<strong>of</strong> criteria:i) Design - To be evaluated in accordancewith 2.4. “In particular, where newdevelopment is proposed abutting existingresidential development it shall be designedto be compatible with that existingdevelopment with respect to scale andmassing. Adequate buffering will also beprovided.”2.7.5 ii) Heritage Preservation requires thatstandard archaeological potential criteria beused to evaluate future development areas.2.7.5 iii) Natural Heritage System Indicatesthat any development in the EnvironmentalConstraint and Forest Area designationsmust conform to policies <strong>of</strong> Section 2.3. Inaddition, all development is to be evaluatedwith respect to conformity with Section 2.3.2.7.5 iv) Watercourses requireswatercourses to be maintained or enhancedtogether with lands immediately adjacentto same.<strong>The</strong> design <strong>of</strong> the development conceptis generally compatible with theadjacent existing residentialdevelopment. Development consists <strong>of</strong>single detached dwellings similar inscale to the adjacent single detacheddwellings. <strong>The</strong> buildings are similar inheight taking into account thedifferences in grade. However,careful consideration is required <strong>of</strong> therelationship where the proposed newunits back onto existing developmentincluding the specific setback from theproperty line to ensure an appropriaterelationship between the existingdevelopment and the proposeddevelopment. Siting <strong>of</strong> buildings, thedesign <strong>of</strong> the rear façade, the depth <strong>of</strong>the rear yard and landscaping will haveto be carefully considered to minimizeloss <strong>of</strong> privacy.<strong>The</strong> applicant has prepared a Phase 1-2archaeological study which indicatedthat no archaeological resources wereencountered on the site and that itshould be considered as cleared <strong>of</strong> anyrequirement for further archaeologicalfieldwork.<strong>The</strong> applicant has submitted anEnvironmental Impact Study andaddendum and other related studiesincluding a geomorphic and meanderbelt width analysis and stormwaterDevelopment generallysatisfies criteria. Howevercareful consideration willhave to be given in theZoning By-law to theminimum building setback.Landscaping and anyadditional fencingrequirements will berequired to be establishedthrough the zoning bylawand condominiumapproval. A detailedgrading plan to minimizegrades adjacent to existinghomes will be required aspart <strong>of</strong> the plan <strong>of</strong>condominium.<strong>The</strong> application conformsto this policy.<strong>The</strong> application conformsto these policies subject tothe conditions to beestablished through thezoning bylaw and plan <strong>of</strong>condominium.analysis. <strong>The</strong> application has beenevaluated by the <strong>Township</strong> and theLSRCA with respect to the lands in theEnvironmental Constraint and ForestArea designations and the <strong>Uxbridge</strong>Brook and the development has beendeemed appropriate subject toconditions to be established throughthe zoning bylaw and plan <strong>of</strong>condominium including the zoning <strong>of</strong>lands to be protected in anEnvironmental Protection Zone.2.7.5v) Sewer and Water Services and See discussion <strong>of</strong> 2.2B-8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!