13.07.2015 Views

REPORT - The Township of Uxbridge

REPORT - The Township of Uxbridge

REPORT - The Township of Uxbridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix B<strong>Township</strong> Official Plan ReviewPolicy Discussion Conclusionsuch elements as landscaped areas, and therelationship between the public street, frontyards and primary entrances to dwellingunits;iii) relationship between the rear wall <strong>of</strong>buildings and rear yard open spaces; and,iv) siting <strong>of</strong> buildings in relation to abuttingproperties ensures that there will be nosignificant impacts with respect to loss <strong>of</strong>privacy and shadowing, and thatappropriate buffering can be provided.”differential based on the cross sections;ii) the relationship to the street issimilar, but does not affect theestablished neighbourhood given thelocation <strong>of</strong> the area which forms itsown enclave;iii) the cross sections show aminimum building setback <strong>of</strong> 9.1metres from the rear <strong>of</strong> the proposedbuildings abutting adjacent residentialdevelopment to the rear lot line,although other plans identify aminimum rear yard <strong>of</strong> 8 metres. <strong>The</strong>cross sections and draft plan also showthe rear property line further bufferedby fencing and proposed screenlandscaping.iv) siting <strong>of</strong> buildings, and the design<strong>of</strong> the rear façade and deck, grading,the depth <strong>of</strong> the rear yard andlandscaping will have to be carefullyconsidered to minimize loss <strong>of</strong>privacy, although shadowing wouldnot be an issue.through the zoning bylawand condominiumapproval. A detailedgrading plan to minimizegrades adjacent to existinghomes will be required aspart <strong>of</strong> the plan <strong>of</strong>condominium.2.5.5.3.2 New Residential AreasApplications are to be evaluated based ontheir conformity with the policies <strong>of</strong> thePlan, particularly Section 2.4, CommunityDesign Strategy and the following criteria:“i) the development incorporates theUrban Area’s Natural Heritage System asdesignated on Schedule ‘B”, and additionalparkland where there is no significantEnvironmental Constraint Areas, as a focalpoint for the residential development, and astructural element which defines thecharacter <strong>of</strong> the area, including theprovision <strong>of</strong> significant view corridors intolands which form part <strong>of</strong> the System, andwhere possible direct public access;ii) medium density residential areas are:a) intermixed with low densitydevelopment in small groups;b) primarily street oriented in design; and,c) located adjacent to collector and arterialroads, park and open space areas,community facilities and/or commercial<strong>The</strong> development generally conformsto the criteria recognizing its locationadjacent to an established residentialarea as follows:i) the application includes keycomponents <strong>of</strong> the Natural HeritageSystem (i.e. Environmental Constraint,Forest), and allows for their continuedprotection and dedication to the<strong>Township</strong>. Views into this area willcontinue to be provided from theabutting streets with potential fordirect public access.ii) the development is a low densityarea and therefore the criteria insubsection ii) are not applicable.<strong>The</strong> development generallyconforms to the criteriarecognizing its locationadjacent to an establishedresidential area.B-6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!