JeanPaul_Sartre_JeanPaul_Sartre_Basic_Writing

134Jean-Paul Sartre: Basic Writingsmeaning, for it would suggest a unity of two examples of being-in-itself, andSartre’s point here is their duality and isolation from each other. Tr.5 I have corrected what must surely be a misprint. “From the authentic to theauthentic,” as the text actually reads, would make no sense. Tr.6 Cf. Introduction, section III.7 This reasoning indeed is explicitly based on the exigencies of reason.8 Sartre says “annihilated” here, but I feel that he must have meant “nihilated” sincehe has told us earlier that being cannot be annihilated. Tr.9 Part One, chapter II, section ii. “Patterns of Bad Faith.”10 “The other” in this passage must of course not be confused with “The Other”discussed in connection with the problem of human relationships. Tr.