03.12.2012 Views

SEG 45 Final_qx4 - Society of Economic Geologists

SEG 45 Final_qx4 - Society of Economic Geologists

SEG 45 Final_qx4 - Society of Economic Geologists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OCTOBER 2005 • No 63 <strong>SEG</strong> NEWSLETTER 5<br />

Exploring For Deposits Under<br />

Deep Cover Using Geochemistry<br />

Eion M. Cameron †, Eion Cameron Geochemical Inc., Carp, Ontario K0A 1L0, Canada, Matthew I. Leybourne, Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Geosciences, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75083-0688, USA, and David L. Kelley (<strong>SEG</strong> 1990 F) Newmont<br />

Technical Facility, 10101 E. Dry Creek Rd., Englewood, Colorado 80112<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

In a recent article in the <strong>SEG</strong> Newsletter, Roy Woodall drew attention to the challenge<br />

<strong>of</strong> finding ore deposits under deep cover. He highlighted the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

structure: “…recognition <strong>of</strong> pathways for magma and fluid transport is highly relevant<br />

for effective ore search under deep cover. Structures not only focus the transport<br />

<strong>of</strong> ore metals and the ubiquitous carbon and sulfur, they also focus energy,<br />

which is the most critical and <strong>of</strong>ten forgotten essential component for the genesis<br />

<strong>of</strong> a major ore deposit” (Woodall, 2005).<br />

Over the period 1999 to 2002, the Canadian Mining Industry Research<br />

Organization (CAMIRO), supported by 26 companies, sponsored the project<br />

“Deep-Penetrating Geochemistry” to provide the mining industry with knowledge<br />

about processes that may form anomalies at surface over buried deposits, and to<br />

provide comparative data on methods used to detect these anomalies. The study<br />

areas were the porphyry belt <strong>of</strong> northern Chile, the Carlin belt <strong>of</strong> Nevada, and the<br />

Abitibi belt <strong>of</strong> Ontario. In Chile and Nevada, both seismically active regions, the<br />

work demonstrated the importance <strong>of</strong> structure and recent tectonism in the formation<br />

<strong>of</strong> anomalies, bearing out Woodall’s remarks. Here we discuss the influence <strong>of</strong><br />

structure on surface anomalies at the Mike gold-copper deposit, Nevada, and at<br />

the Spence copper deposit, Chile—work that is described in more detail by<br />

Cameron et al. (2004), and Cameron and Leybourne (2005).<br />

<strong>45</strong>18000N<br />

† Corresponding author: e-mail, eioncam@attglobal.net<br />

300 m<br />

Soap Creek Fault Zone<br />

563000E 564000E<br />

High-Grade Cu<br />

D-Day Fault<br />

A<br />

Hillside Fault<br />

WEST<br />

MIKE<br />

Lower-Grade Cu<br />

B<br />

Soil Sampling<br />

Line<br />

Roberts Mountain Thrust<br />

MAIN<br />

MIKE<br />

Good Hope<br />

Fault<br />

1a 1b<br />

Nebulous Fault Zone<br />

N-P Dog Fault<br />

C<br />

<strong>45</strong>18000N<br />

300 m<br />

Soil Sampling Line<br />

563000E<br />

28 o<br />

A<br />

MIKE DEPOSIT<br />

The Mike deposit, hosted by sedimentary<br />

rocks <strong>of</strong> Paleozoic age, was discovered<br />

by Newmont in 1989 while drilling<br />

on structural trends northwest from the<br />

previously discovered Tusc and Gold<br />

Quarry deposits into an area with a<br />

thick cover <strong>of</strong> Carlin Formation rocks.<br />

The first comprehensive account <strong>of</strong> the<br />

geology <strong>of</strong> the deposit was by Teal and<br />

Branham (1997). The Good Hope fault<br />

is the boundary between two portions <strong>of</strong><br />

the Mike deposit (Fig. 1a): the Main<br />

Mike, with a geological resource estimate<br />

<strong>of</strong> 43.2 Mt at 1.17 g/t Au and 76<br />

Mt at 0.22% Cu, and the West Mike,<br />

with an estimated 110 Mt at 0.86 Au<br />

and 74 Mt at 0.28% Cu (Teal and<br />

Branham, 1997). At Main Mike, copper<br />

mineralization consists<br />

<strong>of</strong> a subhorizontal<br />

to page<br />

supergene oxide and 9 ...<br />

B<br />

564000E<br />

FIGURE 1. The Mike deposit. (1a) Basement (Paleozoic) geology with solid lines showing faults and outlines <strong>of</strong> the copper zones. This is mainly<br />

derived from maps by Newmont Inc. with additional faults (D-Day, Hillside, Nebulous, and North-Pointing Dog) from Norby and Orobona<br />

(2002). (1b) Surface topography, with contours in 25 ft intervals. Based on the topographic features, three faults, A, B, and C, were interpreted<br />

by Cameron and Doherty (2001) to cut the Carlin Formation, which covers the deposit. These interpreted faults are also shown in Figure 1a,<br />

which shows that they lie close to and parallel with faults mapped in the basement by Norby and Orobona (2002): fault B with the Nebulous<br />

fault zone, fault C with the North-Pointing Dog fault. These pairs are interpreted to be the same faults, the <strong>of</strong>fsets between their positions at the<br />

surface and in the basement being due to a westerly dip. The topographic feature marking fault A may be the surface expression <strong>of</strong> the<br />

westerly dipping D-Day fault, or a down-faulted block between the D-Day and Hillside faults. Eastings and northings in meters.<br />

C

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!