Fall 2005 PDF - Milton Academy

Fall 2005 PDF - Milton Academy Fall 2005 PDF - Milton Academy

13.07.2015 Views

One piece of AOL programming that hecreated during this period proves thepoint. Jesse’s memorial to Princess Dianainvited emotion-charged participation byAOL members and drew 4.5 million of the10 million AOL subscribers within four tofive days. “Identifying an issue that haspotential to inspire sharing, and then toprovoke people to respond, is not that difficult.People tend to talk about the Internetin ‘masculine’ terms, as a provider ofdata. But I see artistry in the feminizedpart, making connections, feeling deeply,sharing. And I think the importance of theInternet as an encyclopedia and data mineis a distant second to that.”When his AOL stint ended in 2002, Jesselooked for more intimate ways to use theInternet to form global communities ofcaring people. He launched a culturalconcierge site called HeadButler.com. Itsmission: to promote the great, not just thenew. HeadButler.com, he says, tells youabout “books, music and movies youmight never hear about from anyoneelse…stuff that came out last year or theyear before or even decades ago…stuff youmight cherish for the rest of your life.” Onany given day, he might urge you to readSomerset Maugham’s Cakes and Ale(1930), watch William Wyler’s Dodsworth,or listen to Green Day’s “American Idiot”(2004).Just as he was putting on his butler’ssuit, Beliefnet.com, the largest spiritualsite on the Web, asked him to be itsliberal blogger, so he signed on for ayear’s tour of duty as Swami Uptown[http://www.beliefnet.com/story/145/story_14546_1.html]. The experience was“I’m going back to my room, where the media isa little less mainstream.”Jesse Kornbluth ’64not a happy one: “Five days a week I putmy head into the Iraq war and the damageit does to our spiritual and emotionallives. I believe in posting my emailaddress; I got a lot of anguished mail. Ianswered it all. And it burned me out.Now I do one Swami a week, and I feelI’m more effective.”Jesse still writes columns for magazinesand is working on a book, but the Internetis where he finds his greatest satisfaction.“The Internet is the Maginot Line—theone completely free, global source of informationand opinion,” Jesse argues. “It’s allthat stands between us and the completedominance of corporate news sources,which are understandably slow to annoytheir well-connected owners. But on theWeb, anyone can be Tom Paine: You don’thave to be hired or hyped, you just have tobe forceful, factual and lively. I can have100 times the impact online than I can inprint. I can be emotional and I can behonest. I can do advocacy without violatingany code. I can absolutely be whoI am and I can also find out who I am—because, as every teacher who welcomeshonest exchange knows, no one gets morevalue out of a class than the instructor.“The huge advantage of the Internet is thedeath of the old top-down communication,the ‘celebrity voice.’ My readers, not individually,but collectively, are smarter than Iam. People like me take great pains to beaccurate, to link to good sources. Butthere’s equal value in hearing from readerswho have fresh information and newpoints of view. That’s the single biggestreason why so many traditional journalistsand media potentates hate (and fear) theInternet. Internet technology makes journalistsaccountable, and the community’sjudgment can be swift and harsh.“It’s a big issue for media that the younglive online, and that there’s widespreaddisrespect for traditional media amongsmart young people. Well, the kids are onto something: They can find better stuffon the Web. The classic example is theDowning Street memo, buried in theWashington Post, two weeks late and onpage A18; the coverage wasn’t much betterin the New York Times. It was the Web thatdrove that memo into the news inAmerica.“Our destiny as a species is to seek lightand radiance, to love the truth. Talkingabout that in terms of journalism is odd,but the media is an agent of all of it. Onthe Internet—not so much in print, neveron TV, and rarely in the movies—you canfeel a desire for unity, peace, compassionand understanding. That’s why I love thismedium like I’ve never loved anythingelse.”Cathleen EverettEditor’s note: Over the 18 months leading upto May 2005, Jesse wrote for Tina Brown’sTopic [A] “views magazine.” The show wasdoomed, Jesse feels, in part because it washosted by the wrong network, the businessorientedCNBC. “I love working with Tina,”he says. “I’m not going to work with or foranyone smarter, any time soon.” In an articlefor mediabistro.com, Jesse explained that heis now turning his energy back to his novel,finding a credible resolution for his characters’“achingly plausible” situation. “The paradoxof fiction is that, at least for the author,it is reality.” [www.mediabistro.com/articles/cache/a4528.asp]4 Milton Magazine

Zander Dryer ’00NEW MEDIA:T o u c h p o i n t sA s a matter of his own past and future,Zander Dryer ’00 is a student of “newmedia.” After graduating from Yale University,Zander wrote for Slate magazine [Slate isan online magazine only], then continued tofreelance for Slate as he moved to write forThe New Republic (TNR—print andonline). He still writes for both journals, butis working with Peter Beinart, editor of TNR,on Peter’s book about the history of liberalismin the United States over the last century.From Zander’s perspective as a practitioner,certain facts about new media are worthpondering:1. For people my age, the Internet makesit easier to break into the [journalism]business. The appetite and need for onlinecontent is a bottomless pit.2. The immediacy of the Web (to andfrom) is the important thing. For instance,President Bush mentioned in a press conferencelast spring that he might not necessarilyappoint a judge to the SupremeCourt. My editor asked me to research alist of the non-judges he could potentiallyappoint. Within 24 hours an article wasposted. Writing is posted constantly, withinmoments of an event; uploading occursanytime and all the time.3. In Washington, D.C., at least, Weblogslike John Marshall’s and others drive thenews cycle. Weblogs raise issues; themainstream media find it necessary torespond. Anyone can start a Web site.TNR and other print publications can’twait until the next print cycle to react totoday’s questions and assertions.4. On the other hand, we have an evenmore serious need for journals likeNewsweek and other newsweeklies becausethere’s SO much opinion. I can read 300different people’s opinions, but not manyare thorough, reflective, fact-checked summationsof the facts.5. Is the public lethargic? Will they takethe time to gather news facts? In a wayI’m lucky; scanning blogs is part of myjob. But on any given day I’ll scan threepapers and several blogs, online and manyother people my age do the same.6. Screens are ubiquitous. People my ageare completely comfortable and happyreading on the screen. I don’t want theextra clutter of daily newspapers piling uparound my apartment. (A Washington Postsurvey among young people found theywouldn’t want a paper even if it were free.They prefer to read it online.) Screens, inthe form of laptops that use wireless technology,are everywhere; people can alwaysprint out what they want to save.7. Accountability? The whole computerrevolution has increased accountability:vast databases; powerful, quick, userfriendlysearch engines; hyperlinks; beingforced to see who’s writing the opposite—what arguments they use and what factsthey cite. I’m working with Peter Beinart,whose book is based on a magazine piecehe wrote. We looked to Google to find outreaction to the article when it was published:the reaction then informs theshape of the book that is growing out ofthe article. Add to that the fact that informationcan’t be “lost” anywhere (e.g., transcriptsnailed Trent Lott; attention to hispast life and records were driven by bloggers).The Downing Street Memo exposurewas driven by blogs.8. Right now, the line between blogging—offeringyour opinion—and blogsdriven by a serious political agenda, powerfulpolitical groups, is not necessarilyclear enough.9. A blog about someone’s social life cangain a larger readership than some ofthe medium-sized city newspapers in thecountry.10. People my age are used to being presenteda New York Times article and a blogentry on the first screen in response to aGoogle request. Both are presented democratically,and both have the chance of elicitingequal attention.11. About the audience: Mike Kinsley, thefounding editor of Slate, and former editorof TNR, said, “Our market is the thinkingman’s solitaire.” If you have 15 minutes tokill—click over (you’re already at a com-Zander Dryer ’005 Milton Magazine

Zander Dryer ’00NEW MEDIA:T o u c h p o i n t sA s a matter of his own past and future,Zander Dryer ’00 is a student of “newmedia.” After graduating from Yale University,Zander wrote for Slate magazine [Slate isan online magazine only], then continued tofreelance for Slate as he moved to write forThe New Republic (TNR—print andonline). He still writes for both journals, butis working with Peter Beinart, editor of TNR,on Peter’s book about the history of liberalismin the United States over the last century.From Zander’s perspective as a practitioner,certain facts about new media are worthpondering:1. For people my age, the Internet makesit easier to break into the [journalism]business. The appetite and need for onlinecontent is a bottomless pit.2. The immediacy of the Web (to andfrom) is the important thing. For instance,President Bush mentioned in a press conferencelast spring that he might not necessarilyappoint a judge to the SupremeCourt. My editor asked me to research alist of the non-judges he could potentiallyappoint. Within 24 hours an article wasposted. Writing is posted constantly, withinmoments of an event; uploading occursanytime and all the time.3. In Washington, D.C., at least, Weblogslike John Marshall’s and others drive thenews cycle. Weblogs raise issues; themainstream media find it necessary torespond. Anyone can start a Web site.TNR and other print publications can’twait until the next print cycle to react totoday’s questions and assertions.4. On the other hand, we have an evenmore serious need for journals likeNewsweek and other newsweeklies becausethere’s SO much opinion. I can read 300different people’s opinions, but not manyare thorough, reflective, fact-checked summationsof the facts.5. Is the public lethargic? Will they takethe time to gather news facts? In a wayI’m lucky; scanning blogs is part of myjob. But on any given day I’ll scan threepapers and several blogs, online and manyother people my age do the same.6. Screens are ubiquitous. People my ageare completely comfortable and happyreading on the screen. I don’t want theextra clutter of daily newspapers piling uparound my apartment. (A Washington Postsurvey among young people found theywouldn’t want a paper even if it were free.They prefer to read it online.) Screens, inthe form of laptops that use wireless technology,are everywhere; people can alwaysprint out what they want to save.7. Accountability? The whole computerrevolution has increased accountability:vast databases; powerful, quick, userfriendlysearch engines; hyperlinks; beingforced to see who’s writing the opposite—what arguments they use and what factsthey cite. I’m working with Peter Beinart,whose book is based on a magazine piecehe wrote. We looked to Google to find outreaction to the article when it was published:the reaction then informs theshape of the book that is growing out ofthe article. Add to that the fact that informationcan’t be “lost” anywhere (e.g., transcriptsnailed Trent Lott; attention to hispast life and records were driven by bloggers).The Downing Street Memo exposurewas driven by blogs.8. Right now, the line between blogging—offeringyour opinion—and blogsdriven by a serious political agenda, powerfulpolitical groups, is not necessarilyclear enough.9. A blog about someone’s social life cangain a larger readership than some ofthe medium-sized city newspapers in thecountry.10. People my age are used to being presenteda New York Times article and a blogentry on the first screen in response to aGoogle request. Both are presented democratically,and both have the chance of elicitingequal attention.11. About the audience: Mike Kinsley, thefounding editor of Slate, and former editorof TNR, said, “Our market is the thinkingman’s solitaire.” If you have 15 minutes tokill—click over (you’re already at a com-Zander Dryer ’005 <strong>Milton</strong> Magazine

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!