13.07.2015 Views

chitosan and plga microspheres as drug delivery ... - UniCA Eprints

chitosan and plga microspheres as drug delivery ... - UniCA Eprints

chitosan and plga microspheres as drug delivery ... - UniCA Eprints

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6. RFP Loaded PLGA Microspheres Prepared by Solvent Evaporation Method6.2.5. Nebulization Studies of PLGA MicrospheresNebulization studies were carried out in order to evaluate the stability <strong>and</strong> the suitability ofPLGA particles for pulmonary/n<strong>as</strong>al administration. All these studies were performed byusing both freshly prepared <strong>and</strong> freeze-dried <strong>microspheres</strong>. Different analyses were performedon the nebulized samples. As for <strong>chitosan</strong> <strong>microspheres</strong>, only the sample trapped in water w<strong>as</strong><strong>as</strong>sayed, while the material deposited on the impinger walls w<strong>as</strong> not included.Size of particles w<strong>as</strong> evaluated after the nebulization process <strong>and</strong>, <strong>as</strong> can be seen in table 6.3,there w<strong>as</strong> an important decre<strong>as</strong>e of mean particle size <strong>and</strong> also a significant incre<strong>as</strong>e ofpolidispersity index. The decre<strong>as</strong>e on mean size during nebulization can be explained takinginto account that during this process small particles can be nebulized e<strong>as</strong>ily. Nebulizationproved that PLGA <strong>microspheres</strong>, prepared during this work, were multidimensional <strong>as</strong> it isshown by the high P.I. value. In fact, three different microsphere populations were obtained inthe three different impinger stages. The incre<strong>as</strong>e in P.I. could also be related to the fact thatsize analysis w<strong>as</strong> carried out by DLLS, whose sensitivity is not really appropriate for particlesin the micron range.Table 6.3:Particle Size of Spray-Dried Microspheres Before <strong>and</strong> After NebulizationProcessParticle Size (nmParticle SizeFormulation± SD)P.I ± SD(nm ± SD)P.I ± SDBefore nebulizationAfter nebulizationPLGA 1 2563 ± 49.32 0.192 ± 0.030 1073 ± 35.11 0.778 ± 0.053PLGA 2 2606 ± 61.10 0.203 ± 0.049 1166 ± 32.61 0.857 ± 0.013For all microsphere formulations nebulization efficiency <strong>and</strong> <strong>drug</strong> leakage after nebulizationwere evaluated. Both these parameters depend on the stability of particles.As can be seen in figure 6.3 all formulations showed a good nebulization efficiency (NE%)from 72% for PLGA 1 obtained by adding RFP in the organic ph<strong>as</strong>e, to 65% for PLGA 2obtained by adding RFP in the aqueous ph<strong>as</strong>e. During the nebulization process, part of the<strong>drug</strong> can be lost <strong>as</strong> a consequence of different processes. In fact, some particles, which are toobig, can not be nebulized while others can be disrupted during the process. The little lowerNE% of PLGA 2 formulation is probably connected to the preparation method. In fact, byadding RFP in the aqueous ph<strong>as</strong>e it is possible to have some <strong>drug</strong> on the particle surface, fromwhich can be lose e<strong>as</strong>ily during the nebulization process.94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!