13.07.2015 Views

chitosan and plga microspheres as drug delivery ... - UniCA Eprints

chitosan and plga microspheres as drug delivery ... - UniCA Eprints

chitosan and plga microspheres as drug delivery ... - UniCA Eprints

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. RFP Loaded Chitosan Microspheres Prepared by Precipitation MethodabFigure 4.2: Sem Micrographs of Uncross-Linked Particles (a) <strong>and</strong> Cross-LinkedParticles (b)4.2.3. Surface ChargeZeta potential h<strong>as</strong> a substantial influence on the stability of suspensions, the interaction of<strong>microspheres</strong> with charged <strong>drug</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> also on the adhesion of <strong>drug</strong> <strong>delivery</strong> systems ontobiological surfaces. Consequently, investigation of the zeta potential is an important part ofmicrosphere characterization. Phosphate buffer influenced me<strong>as</strong>urement of zeta potential, dueto the effect of the counterions on the positively charged <strong>chitosan</strong> <strong>microspheres</strong>. For thisre<strong>as</strong>on a solution of KCl 0.1N w<strong>as</strong> used for charge surface me<strong>as</strong>urements.Chitosan <strong>microspheres</strong> were positively charged (Table 4.2), although sulphate ions were used<strong>as</strong> precipitant. This indicates that only a part of the amino groups are neutralized duringmicrosphere formation. A different behaviour could be observed between uncross-linked <strong>and</strong>cross-linked <strong>microspheres</strong> zeta potential. In fact, while the zeta potential of the uncross-linkedparticles slightly incre<strong>as</strong>ed <strong>as</strong> <strong>chitosan</strong> concentration incre<strong>as</strong>ed, the contrary w<strong>as</strong> obtainedwith the cross-linked particles formulations. Moreover, the zeta potential of these l<strong>as</strong>tformulations w<strong>as</strong> smaller than the corresponding uncross-linked formulations 1-3 <strong>as</strong> aconsequence of reduction of amino groups because of interaction with GA.4.2.4. Entrapment Efficiency (E%)Figure 4.4 shows the encapsulation efficiency (E%) of the prepared <strong>microspheres</strong>. In thepresent work, the influence of <strong>chitosan</strong> concentration <strong>and</strong> cross-linking agent on the RFPentrapment in <strong>microspheres</strong> w<strong>as</strong> evaluated. The highest E% w<strong>as</strong> found in formulationsprepared with the lowest amount of <strong>chitosan</strong>, that are Form. Ø <strong>and</strong> Form. ØG obtainedwithout <strong>and</strong> with GA respectively. Chitosan concentration affected considerably the E: inparticular the loading capacity incre<strong>as</strong>ed <strong>as</strong> the <strong>chitosan</strong> concentration decre<strong>as</strong>ed. This isbecause the incre<strong>as</strong>e in <strong>chitosan</strong> concentration led to incre<strong>as</strong>ed solution viscosity thatdrecre<strong>as</strong>ed the loading capacity of the <strong>microspheres</strong> <strong>as</strong> a consequence of the reduced <strong>drug</strong>61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!