13.07.2015 Views

communication in aviation safety: lessons learned and ... - ASASI

communication in aviation safety: lessons learned and ... - ASASI

communication in aviation safety: lessons learned and ... - ASASI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Very little has been written about <strong>communication</strong> issues <strong>in</strong> <strong>aviation</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>tenance <strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>spection. The FAA did sponsor a two day meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> December 1989 which focusedon <strong>in</strong>formation exchange <strong>and</strong> <strong>communication</strong> <strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong>tenance area (Parker &Shepherd, 1990). Latorella <strong>and</strong> Prabhu (2000) note that <strong>communication</strong> is a contribut<strong>in</strong>gfactor to error <strong>in</strong> <strong>aviation</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>tenance. Some research regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>communication</strong> <strong>in</strong> thema<strong>in</strong>tenance arena would be worthwhile, especially <strong>in</strong>to the effectiveness of writtendocuments which Piotrowski (1990) amd Majoros (1990) ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> is an important part ofma<strong>in</strong>tenance <strong>communication</strong>. Aviation ma<strong>in</strong>tenance is an area where jargon <strong>and</strong>acronyms abound (Taylor, 1990). It would be important to <strong>in</strong>vestigate how the usejargon <strong>and</strong> acronyms impacts <strong>aviation</strong> <strong>safety</strong> with<strong>in</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>tenance itself <strong>and</strong> from a widerperspective.These suggestions are but a few that might be important to <strong>in</strong>vestigate regard<strong>in</strong>g theeffects of <strong>communication</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>aviation</strong> <strong>safety</strong>. Given the critical nature of <strong>communication</strong>many other research areas with<strong>in</strong> the cockpit, the cab<strong>in</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>teractions between airl<strong>in</strong>ecrew <strong>and</strong> other parts of the <strong>aviation</strong> system are ripe for research study.THE NEED FOR COMMUNICATION TRAININGThere have been numerous calls for <strong>communication</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, both as an <strong>in</strong>dependenteffort <strong>and</strong> as part of Crew Resource Management (CRM) for flight crews <strong>and</strong> for flightattendants (Baker & Frost; 1994; Butler, 1993; Chidester & Vaughn, 1994; Chute &Wiener, 1996; Edwards, 1992; Federal Aviation Adm<strong>in</strong>istration, 1988, 2004; Grommes<strong>and</strong> Dietrich, 2002; Helmreich, 2000; Sexton & Helmreich, 2000; Young, 1994).Perhaps, more important have been the calls for jo<strong>in</strong>t pilot-flight attendant tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g(Baker & Frost, 1994; Butler, 1993; Chidester & Vaughn, 1994; Chute & Wiener, 1995,1996; ETSC, 1996; Federal Aviation Adm<strong>in</strong>istration, 2004; Helmreich, Wiener, & Kanki,1993; Kayten, 1993; Murphy, 2001; Moshansky, 1994, NTSB, 2000). “We must teachcrews that <strong>communication</strong> <strong>and</strong> cooperation are <strong>safety</strong> issues” (Chute, Wiener, Dunbar, &Hoang, 1996, p. 17).Flight <strong>and</strong> cab<strong>in</strong> crew, while a critical part of the <strong>aviation</strong> environment, should not be theonly focus of <strong>communication</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g as part of an <strong>aviation</strong> <strong>safety</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g program.Flight Safety Foundation (2000) notes that tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programs should <strong>in</strong>clude specialemphasis on pilot controller <strong>communication</strong>. Thomas (2005b) <strong>and</strong> Thomas <strong>and</strong> Petrilli(2004) argue for <strong>communication</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g as part of error management. Latorella <strong>and</strong>Prabhu (2000) <strong>and</strong> Petrowski (1990) note that the importance of <strong>communication</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>aviation</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>tenance tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. Baron (2002) emphasizes the importance of provid<strong>in</strong>gtra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g about runway <strong>in</strong>cursions for pilots, controllers, <strong>and</strong> ground vehicle operators.Etem & Patten (1998) suggest the need for <strong>communication</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> flight <strong>in</strong>struction.However, such calls for tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g generally do not often <strong>in</strong>clude or <strong>in</strong>dicate which<strong>communication</strong> topics are needed, especially when it comes to <strong>in</strong>terpersonal<strong>communication</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g; nor are the specific subtopics needed to help <strong>in</strong>crease<strong>communication</strong> effectiveness generally explicated. The Federal Aviation Adm<strong>in</strong>istration22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!