13.07.2015 Views

2010 BC Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive

2010 BC Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive

2010 BC Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Percentadults. The survey also found that the average number of chronicconditions <strong>in</strong>creases with age.706050Number of chronic diseases (0 <strong>to</strong> 2 or more)reported by age403020012 or more10020-39 40-59 60-79 80+AgeSource: Rapoport, Jacobs, Bell & Klarenbach (2004)With an <strong>in</strong>creased rate of multiple medical conditions, there is also agreater likelihood that ag<strong>in</strong>g drivers will be tak<strong>in</strong>g multiple medications(polypharmacy). With each additional medication taken, there is an<strong>in</strong>creased risk of side effects and adverse <strong>in</strong>teractions betweenmedications, which may affect fitness <strong>to</strong> drive. While <strong>in</strong> many cases theadverse effects may be temporary or avoidable, where specificmedications or dosages are required there may be a persistent impairmen<strong>to</strong>f the functions needed for driv<strong>in</strong>g.Ag<strong>in</strong>g and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomesAs a group, older drivers are less likely <strong>to</strong> be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> a crash thanother age groups. However, the reason for this is that older drivers spendless time driv<strong>in</strong>g than others. When driv<strong>in</strong>g exposure is considered, olderdrivers show an <strong>in</strong>creased crash risk, an <strong>in</strong>creased risk for at-fault crash,and an <strong>in</strong>creased risk of be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>jured and dy<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a crash.Statistics from IC<strong>BC</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicate that older drivers are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> adisproportionate number of at-fault crashes. The chart below shows theratio of at-fault (50% liable) <strong>to</strong> not-at-fault crashes for different agegroups. <strong>Drive</strong>rs between the ages of 16 and 20 have more than 1.5 timesthe average at-fault versus not-at-fault crashes. <strong>Drive</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> the 30 <strong>to</strong> 65 agegroup have a lower-than-average at-fault crash ratio. At about age 70, the383

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!