2010 BC Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive
2010 BC Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive 2010 BC Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive
Delivering the judgement of the Court, McLachlin J. wrote that:“Driving automobiles is a privilege most adult Canadians take forgranted. It is important to their lives and work. While the privilege canbe removed because of risk, it must not be removed on the basis ofdiscriminatory assumptions founded on stereotypes of disability, ratherthan actual capacity to drive safely. … This case is not about whetherunsafe drivers must be allowed to drive. There is no suggestion that avisually impaired driver should be licensed unless she or he cancompensate for the impairment and drive safely. Rather, this case isabout whether, on the evidence … [the driver] should have been givena chance to prove through an individual assessment that he coulddrive.”The medical condition guidelines outlined in the medical conditionchapters of this Manual are based on presumed group characteristics ofindividuals with each medical condition. However, consistent with thedecision in Grismer, OSMV makes driver fitness determinations on anindividual basis. This is why the medical condition guidelines are calledguidelines; they are a starting point for decision-making, but may notapply to every individual. Where appropriate, OSMV utilizes individualassessments to determine whether an individual’s functional ability todrive is impaired and, if so, whether the individual can compensate for theimpairment.24
3.5 Best informationDriver fitness determinations will be based on the best information that isavailable.For each individual, OSMV gathers the best information that is availableand required to determine fitness. Depending upon the nature of thefunctional impairment, the best information may include results ofspecialized functional assessments that clearly indicate whether or not anindividual is fit to drive, such as a DriveABLE assessment that measuresimpairment of cognitive ability as it relates to driving. For otherindividuals and impairments there may be no scientifically validatedassessment tools available that can accurately measure the impact of amedical condition on the functions necessary for driving. In the case ofindividuals with episodic impairments, OSMV has to rely on the results ofmedical assessments as the best information available for determiningfitness to drive.25
- Page 1 and 2: Ministry of Public Safety and Solic
- Page 3 and 4: AcknowledgmentsResearcherBonnie M.
- Page 5 and 6: Table of Contents (click on any ite
- Page 7 and 8: 11.7 Private and commercial drivers
- Page 9 and 10: 17.7 Private and commercial drivers
- Page 11 and 12: 20.8 Private and commercial drivers
- Page 13 and 14: BACKGROUND ........................
- Page 15 and 16: PART 1:BACKGROUND1
- Page 17 and 18: Appendix 2: Excerpts from the MVA t
- Page 19 and 20: Chapter 2: The Driver Fitness Progr
- Page 21 and 22: for the exercise of discretion by O
- Page 23 and 24: 1. SCREENINGA driver disclosesa med
- Page 25 and 26: 2.3 Roles and responsibilitiesOSMV
- Page 27 and 28: Medical practitionersMedical practi
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 3:Driver Fitness Program Pr
- Page 31 and 32: Because of these limitations, OSMV
- Page 33 and 34: Example: the temporary storage of i
- Page 35 and 36: Motor functions (including sensorim
- Page 37: an individual with poor contrast se
- Page 41 and 42: Chapter 4: Introduction to the Poli
- Page 43 and 44: 3. DETERMINATIONFrom2. AssessmentAn
- Page 45 and 46: Once identified, a DMER is mailed t
- Page 47 and 48: 5.3 Screening aging driversDefiniti
- Page 49 and 50: 5.5 Transient impairmentsDefinition
- Page 51 and 52: Chapter 6: Assessment Policies and
- Page 53 and 54: 6.2 Assessments will only be reques
- Page 55 and 56: 6.4 Requesting specialist assessmen
- Page 57 and 58: Policy6.5.1 If a case manager or ad
- Page 59 and 60: Persistent and episodic impairments
- Page 61 and 62: further assessment. Drivers who sco
- Page 63 and 64: 6.9.4 A case manager or adjudicator
- Page 65 and 66: ASSESSMENT PROCEDURESCase manager o
- Page 67 and 68: A driver fitness determination is a
- Page 69 and 70: Policy rationaleBecause individuals
- Page 71 and 72: 7.5.3 Generally, an individual whos
- Page 73 and 74: 7.6.2 In particular, the case manag
- Page 75 and 76: 7.8.3 Whether an individual can com
- Page 77 and 78: in order to be fit to drive, the ca
- Page 79 and 80: has the judgment and willingness to
- Page 81 and 82: Policy7.11.1 If a case manager or a
- Page 83 and 84: (e) the medical condition results i
- Page 85 and 86: 7.12 Communicating a decisionPolicy
- Page 87 and 88: 7.13 Determination proceduresThe fo
Deliver<strong>in</strong>g the judgement of the Court, McLachl<strong>in</strong> J. wrote that:“Driv<strong>in</strong>g au<strong>to</strong>mobiles is a privilege most adult Canadians take forgranted. It is important <strong>to</strong> their lives and work. While the privilege canbe removed because of risk, it must not be removed on the basis ofdiscrim<strong>in</strong>a<strong>to</strong>ry assumptions founded on stereotypes of disability, ratherthan actual capacity <strong>to</strong> drive safely. … This case is not about whetherunsafe drivers must be allowed <strong>to</strong> drive. There is no suggestion that avisually impaired driver should be licensed unless she or he cancompensate for the impairment and drive safely. Rather, this case isabout whether, on the evidence … [the driver] should have been givena chance <strong>to</strong> prove through an <strong>in</strong>dividual assessment that he coulddrive.”The medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the medical conditionchapters of this Manual are based on presumed group characteristics of<strong>in</strong>dividuals with each medical condition. However, consistent with thedecision <strong>in</strong> Grismer, OSMV makes driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations on an<strong>in</strong>dividual basis. This is why the medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es are calledguidel<strong>in</strong>es; they are a start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t for decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g, but may notapply <strong>to</strong> every <strong>in</strong>dividual. Where appropriate, OSMV utilizes <strong>in</strong>dividualassessments <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e whether an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s functional ability <strong>to</strong>drive is impaired and, if so, whether the <strong>in</strong>dividual can compensate for theimpairment.24