13.07.2015 Views

2010 BC Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive

2010 BC Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive

2010 BC Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Monocular visionResearch on monocular vision and driv<strong>in</strong>g is limited, with most studies conducted before 1980.The evidence suggests that monocular drivers have higher crash and traffic violation rates.Impaired contrast sensitivityIn general, the available research suggests that impairments <strong>in</strong> contrast sensitivity are associatedwith impairments <strong>in</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g performance. However, those associations are <strong>in</strong>sufficient <strong>to</strong>support specific decisions regard<strong>in</strong>g loss of contrast sensitivity and cont<strong>in</strong>ued driv<strong>in</strong>g. Moreresearch is required <strong>to</strong> develop screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong>ols for contrast sensitivity that are valid and reliable<strong>in</strong> the driver fitness context.Dark adaptation and glare recoveryDespite its obvious relevance <strong>to</strong> safe driv<strong>in</strong>g performance, there is little <strong>in</strong> the way of research <strong>to</strong>assist the medical community or licens<strong>in</strong>g agency personnel <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g decisions related <strong>to</strong> darkadaptation, glare recovery, and driv<strong>in</strong>g.Visual field loss <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g hemianopiaA significant body of literature now exists on the relationship between visual field loss anddriv<strong>in</strong>g performance, as measured either by crashes, on-road performance, or from simula<strong>to</strong>rstudies. Few studies have been done on hemianopia and driv<strong>in</strong>g. Taken <strong>to</strong>gether, the resultsfrom the on road and crash literature suggest that visual field deficits can and do compromisedriv<strong>in</strong>g performance. However, the current body of evidence fails <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>form on the extent ofdeficit <strong>in</strong> the visual field that must be present before driv<strong>in</strong>g is impaired.Diplopia and NystagmusThere is little or no research on diplopia or nystagmus and driv<strong>in</strong>g performance.CataractsResults on the impact of cataracts on driv<strong>in</strong>g performance are mixed, with some studies show<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>creased risk of crashes, rang<strong>in</strong>g from 1.3 <strong>to</strong> 2.5 times higher than those without cataracts.However, other studies have failed <strong>to</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d an association between cataracts and crash rates.Results from studies that have exam<strong>in</strong>ed self-reported difficulties <strong>in</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g performance aremore uniform, with the majority of participants report<strong>in</strong>g difficulties <strong>in</strong> many aspects of driv<strong>in</strong>g.Notably, cataract surgery results <strong>in</strong> an improvement <strong>in</strong> visual function<strong>in</strong>g. However, asignificant percentage of <strong>in</strong>dividuals cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>to</strong> report difficulties <strong>in</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g, particularly atnight. An important consideration is when driv<strong>in</strong>g can safely resume follow<strong>in</strong>g cataract surgery.Unfortunately, there is a paucity of data <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>form on this issue. Of equal importance are theeffects of wait times for cataract surgery on visual functions related <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g. Current literature262

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!