Corporate governance statementThe term of office of mem<strong>be</strong>rs of the Committee correspondsto the term of office as Director.Mem<strong>be</strong>rs of theStanding CommitteeCurrentterm of officeAttendancerateGérald Frère, Chairman <strong>2011</strong>-2015 100.00%Paul Desmarais <strong>2011</strong>-2015 25.00%Paul Desmarais, jr <strong>2011</strong>-2015 100.00%Al<strong>be</strong>rt Frère <strong>2011</strong>-2015 100.00%Michel Plessis-Bélair 2010-2013 75.00%Thierry de Rudder 2009-2012 75.00%Gilles Samyn <strong>2011</strong>-2015 100.00%Amaury de Seze 2010-2013 100.00%Total 84.38%2.1.2. Frequency of meetings and deli<strong>be</strong>rationsThe Standing Committee met on four occasions in <strong>2011</strong>.Mem<strong>be</strong>rs’ average attendance rate for all meetings in <strong>2011</strong>was 84.38%. The Directors’ individual attendance rate atthese meetings are shown in the table above.At its different meetings, the Standing Committee addressedthe main subjects to <strong>be</strong> deli<strong>be</strong>rated upon by the Board,namely:• the evolution of the portfolio;• the group’s cash position;• the financing policy;• the dividend policy;• the investment policy and projects;• the outlook for and evaluation of the group’s investments;• the evolution of the group’s governance.2.2. Nomination and Remuneration Committee2.2.1. CompositionThe Committee currently has five mem<strong>be</strong>rs. It is chaired byMaurice Lippens.The term of office of mem<strong>be</strong>rs of the Committee correspondsto the term of office as Director.Mem<strong>be</strong>rs of the Nominationand Remuneration CommitteeCurrent termof officeAttendancerateMaurice Lippens, Chairman 2010-2013 100.00%Michel Plessis-Bélair 2010-2013 75.00%Gilles Samyn <strong>2011</strong>-2015 100.00%Jean Stéphenne 2010-2013 100.00%Gunter Thielen 2010-2013 75.00%Total 90.00%All mem<strong>be</strong>rs of the Nomination and Remuneration Committeeare non-executive Directors, three of whom are independent.2.2.2. Frequency of meetings and deli<strong>be</strong>rationsThe Nomination and Remuneration Committee met four timesin <strong>2011</strong>. Mem<strong>be</strong>rs’ average attendance rate for all meetings in<strong>2011</strong> was 90.00%. The Directors’ individual attendance ratesat these meetings are shown in the table above.At these meetings, the Committee focused primarily on thefollowing subjects:• renewal of terms of office, nomination of Directors,ascertainment of the independence of a Director andappointment of committee mem<strong>be</strong>rs;• delegation of day-to-day management;• evaluation of interactions <strong>be</strong>tween non-executive Directorsand Executive Management;• setting of the coefficient to <strong>be</strong> used to determine themaximum value of stock options to <strong>be</strong> granted to ExecutiveManagement and group staff in <strong>2011</strong>;• a proposal to amend the remuneration policy for nonexecutiveDirectors;• proposals on remuneration for non-executive mem<strong>be</strong>rsof the Board of Directors and for the group’s ManagingDirectors;• proposals on the supplementary pension plan for staff andExecutive Management;• proposals concerning the evolution of the group’sgovernance;• drafting of the reumuneration report and review ofother corporate governance documents concerningthe appointment and remuneration of executives, to <strong>be</strong>published in the annual report.2.3. Audit Committee2.3.1. CompositionThe Audit Committee is currently composed of four mem<strong>be</strong>rs.It is chaired by Jean-Louis Beffa. Antoinette d’AspremontLynden has <strong>be</strong>en appointed to the Committee to replaceGunter Thielen as from the Ordinary General Meetingon 12 April <strong>2011</strong>.The term of office of mem<strong>be</strong>rs of the Committee correspondsto the term of office as Director.Mem<strong>be</strong>rs of the Audit CommitteeCurrent termof officeAttendancerateJean-Louis Beffa, Chairman 2010-2013 100.00%Antoinette d’Aspremont Lynden (1) <strong>2011</strong>-2015 100.00%Gilles Samyn <strong>2011</strong>-2015 100.00%Arnaud Vial 2010-2013 100.00%Total 93.75% (1)(1) Attendance rate calculated on the basis of the weighted presence of all mem<strong>be</strong>rs during exerciseof their mandate in <strong>2011</strong> (including Gunter Thielen)The Committee has the necessary expertise in the area ofremuneration policy.136 <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2011</strong>
All mem<strong>be</strong>rs of the Committee are non-executive Directors.Two mem<strong>be</strong>rs, including its chairman, are independent withinthe meaning of Article 526(b) of the Company Code. The twoare Jean-Louis Beffa and Antoinette d’Aspremont Lynden, whorepresent 50% of the Committee’s mem<strong>be</strong>rs. The 2009 Codeprovides that the majority of mem<strong>be</strong>rs of the Audit Committeemust <strong>be</strong> independent Directors. However, owing to GBL’sshareholding structure, the Charter allows a derogation fromthis provision and limit the num<strong>be</strong>r of independent Directors tohalf the Committee’s mem<strong>be</strong>rship.As stated in the biographies of mem<strong>be</strong>rs of the Board ofDirectors presented from page 126 to page 130 of this report,all mem<strong>be</strong>rs of the Committee have financial and/or accountingexpertise as a result of their education or experience.2.3.2. Frequency of meetings and deli<strong>be</strong>rationsThe Audit Committee met on four occasions in <strong>2011</strong> with anaverage attendance rate of 93.75%, calculated on the basisof the weighted attendance of all mem<strong>be</strong>rs during exerciseof their mandate. Committee mem<strong>be</strong>rs were either physicallypresent for meetings or participated by telephone. TheDirectors’ individual attendance rate at these meetings areshown in the table above.One mem<strong>be</strong>r of the Executive Management, the Company’sChief Financial Officer, as well as its Statutory Auditor,attended all the meetings.The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors withits task of ensuring the true and fair presentation of GBL’saccounts and consolidated financial statements and withits auditing responsibilities in the broad sense of the term,in particular the quality of internal audits and of informationprovided to shareholders and markets.In <strong>2011</strong>, the main subjects addressed by the Committee wereas follows:• review of the Company’s annual and half-yearly consolidatedfinancial statements and consolidated quarterly results;• review of projections for the short and medium terms;• analysis of the financing situation and indebtness;• review of the book values of shareholdings, including therecording of an impairment on Lafarge;• review of risks and assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control and risk management systems;• review of press releases, notably concerning the group’sfinancial statements and results;• review of texts to <strong>be</strong> published in the annual reportconcerning:- financial information;- comments on internal control and risk management;• review and follow-up of the independence of and servicesprovided by the Statutory Auditor, other than the tasksassigned by law (in particular the statutory auditing of theaccounts).• examination of the full consolidation of Imerys and of theensuing consequences on the presentation of the financialstatements;• follow-up of the main legal actions under way.2.4. Assessment of the functioning and performanceof the Board of Directors’ CommitteesIn terms of the evolution and effectiveness of their work, thedifferent Committees may, at any time, propose changes totheir respective rules of procedure. The Charter therefore doesnot establish a regular procedure for review of the Committees’rules of procedure. The functioning and performance of eachCommittee is measured and analysed as part of the triennialassessment of the performance of the Board of Directors. Partof the individual assessment questionnaire is reserved for thispurpose to mem<strong>be</strong>rs of the respective Committees.3. Remuneration <strong>Report</strong>3.1. Procedure for establishing remuneration policy and settingremuneration for mem<strong>be</strong>rs of the Board of DirectorsThe procedure for establishing remuneration policy andsetting remuneration for mem<strong>be</strong>rs of the Board is determinedby the Board of Directors on the basis of proposals from theNomination and Remuneration Committee.The fees paid to non-executive Directors are set by theBoard of Directors on a proposal from the Nomination andRemuneration Committee, within a ceiling submitted to theGeneral Meeting for approval. These fees, which had not <strong>be</strong>enreviewed since 2001, were <strong>be</strong>nchmarked and revised in <strong>2011</strong>.The nature and the amount of the remunerations, as well aspossible severance payments, for mem<strong>be</strong>rs of ExecutiveManagement are decided by the Board of Directors on aproposal from the Nomination and Remuneration Committee,which is assisted in its work by an outside consultant.Performance-based stock option plans are determined bythe Board of Directors on a proposal from the Nomination andRemuneration Committee.These plans must first <strong>be</strong> approved by the shareholders.Such approval covers the plan itself as well as its overallmaximum value, but not the individual grant of stock optionsunder the plan.Corporate governance statement<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2011</strong> 137