Regarding the interacti<strong>on</strong> betweenphytohorm<strong>on</strong>es <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s, plantletsneoformati<strong>on</strong> showed values between 41,90 to GA3 1mg/l <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 89% for ANA 2,5 mg/l, at a high amplitude of48,10%. For alpha naphtaleneacetic acid c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>of 2,5 mg/l enable it to obtain a significantly higherpercent of plantelets neoformati<strong>on</strong> than the valuesrecorded at the other c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s. Use of 2,4-D acid,statistically assured there were differences <strong>on</strong>lybetween results obtained at c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> of 2,5 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>0,5 mg/l (table 1).Effect of phytohorm<strong>on</strong>es <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> plantlets neoformati<strong>on</strong> rateNr.C<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> (mg/l)Phytohorm<strong>on</strong>escrt 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,51 ANA 72,53a 76,13a 74,70ab 82,40a 89,00a2 2,4 D 72,30a 73,70a 78,67a 82,03a 85,90a3 AIA 70,60a 68,80a 70,83ab 75,10a 76,90ab4 AIB 62,73a 68,40a 70,23a 58,53b 64,93b5 BA 66,53a 64,07a 62,87b 64,00b 68,07b6 KIN 67,27a 67,60a 69,10ab 67,20b 69,03b7 GA3 42,80b 41,90b 43,60c 42,40c 43,77cDL 5% =12,22 DL 1% =16,23 DL 0,1% =21,05Table 1When using alpha indolilacetic acid, amino isobutyricacid, benzilaminopurine, kinetine <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> giberellic acidc<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> did not <str<strong>on</strong>g>influence</str<strong>on</strong>g> significantly thepercentage of shoots neoformati<strong>on</strong> to D. barbatus.Regarding the effect of combinati<strong>on</strong>s ofphytohorm<strong>on</strong>es <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> their c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> the shootsneoformati<strong>on</strong> from Dianthus barbatus, is noted thatstatistically assured there are real differences betweenboth unilateral effects of these factors combined, whilethe variati<strong>on</strong> was very low due explants.Effect of phytohorm<strong>on</strong>es combinati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> plantlets neoformati<strong>on</strong> rateNr. Phytohorm<strong>on</strong>es C<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>(mg/l)crt combinati<strong>on</strong> 0,5/0,5 1,5/0,5 2,0/1,0 2,5/1,0 2,5/2,51 ANA/BA 80,47 83,23ab 91,87 93,13a 90,002 ANA/KIN 82,97 85,53a 85,37 91,77ab 94,403 2,4 D/BA 73,53 72,63b 83,73 81,37b 89,034 2,4 D/KIN 77,10 84,17ab 87,77 91,70ab 91,535 ANA/GA3 77,93 82,77ab 82,60 82,20ab 83,27DL 5% =11,65 DL 1% =15,55 DL 0,1% =20,32Table 2Regarding the interacti<strong>on</strong> between combinati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s of phytohorm<strong>on</strong>es in Diantus barbatusshoots neoformati<strong>on</strong> were recorded range from 72,63to versi<strong>on</strong> 2,4-D/BA - 0,5/0,5 mg/l <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 93,13% forANA/BA - 2,5/1,0 mg/l, at a 20,50% amplitude. Atc<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s of 0,5/0,5; 2,0/1,0 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2,5/2,5, nosignificant differences occurred between combinati<strong>on</strong>sof phytohorm<strong>on</strong>es in terms of their effect <strong>on</strong> shootsneoformati<strong>on</strong> percentage (table 2).Regarding the combined effect ofphytohorm<strong>on</strong>es <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> their c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> plantletsrooting of D. barbatus, the results showed a wideamplitude of 2,77 with limits ranging from 25,83 forthe combinati<strong>on</strong> 2,5 mg/l KIN to 89,17% thecombinati<strong>on</strong> 2 mg/l GA3.Taking into account the effect ofphytohorm<strong>on</strong>es at various c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s, it appearsthat whatever the c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> used, citokinine had asignificant lower effect than other horm<strong>on</strong>es in termsof rate of plantlets rooting. Lowest variability betweenhorm<strong>on</strong>e c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> was recorded at 0,5 mg/l whilethe c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> of 2,0 mg/l occurred largestdeviati<strong>on</strong>s between the effects of phytohorm<strong>on</strong>es <strong>on</strong>the process of rooting (table 3).Given the cumulative effect of phytohorm<strong>on</strong>es <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s of different combinati<strong>on</strong>s, plantletsrooting rate for D. barbatus showed values rangingfrom 36% for the combinati<strong>on</strong> 2,4-D/BA at a combinedc<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> of 1,5 mg/l <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 96,60% for combinati<strong>on</strong>ANA/GA3 at the total c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> of 5 mg/l, at avery high amplitude of 60,60%.204
Effect of phytohorm<strong>on</strong>es <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> plantlets rooting rateNr.C<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> (mg/l)Phytohorm<strong>on</strong>escrt 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,51 ANA 85,70a 88,23a 84,93a 87,80a 88,73a2 2,4 D 77,93a 77,13ab 79,87ab 80,00ab 81,43ab3 AIA 74,83a 84,27a 56,73cd 82,40a 62,33bc4 AIB 44,47b 58,03bc 63,70bc 60,37b 60,40cd5 BA 50,60b 39,77c 40,87de 39,33c 42,07de6 KIN 38,37b 45,57c 29,90e 28,00c 25,83e7 GA3 79,90a 84,70a 82,43ab 89,17a 88,30aDL5%=20,44 DL1%=27,17 DL0,1%=35,23Effect of phytohorm<strong>on</strong>es combinati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> plantlets rooting rateNr. Phytohorm<strong>on</strong>esC<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> (mg/l)crt combinati<strong>on</strong> 0,5/0,5 1,5/0,5 2,0/1,0 2,5/1,0 2,5/2,51 ANA/BA 47,57c 57,63bc 58,97b 63,60b 74,23b2 ANA/KIN 69,53b 71,27b 61,90b 69,97b 65,77bc3 2,4 D/BA 40,30c 37,23d 36,00c 36,40c 41,47d4 2,4 D/KIN 43,67c 48,67cd 49,60bc 41,47c 47,17cd5 ANA/GA3 93,83a 92,30a 92,83a 95,40a 96,60aDL5%=19,79 DL1%=26,40 DL0,1%=34,50Changing horm<strong>on</strong>al balance for the combinati<strong>on</strong>s ofphytohorm<strong>on</strong>es had a major <str<strong>on</strong>g>influence</str<strong>on</strong>g>, significant <strong>on</strong>rooting process. The highest differences betweencombinati<strong>on</strong>s of phytohorm<strong>on</strong>es is observed atc<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s of 1 mg/l <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the lowest deviati<strong>on</strong>s atthe c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> of 5 mg/l (table 4).C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>sAt Dianthus barbatus <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> all sources ofvariati<strong>on</strong>, phytohorm<strong>on</strong>es, respectively theirc<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> their combined effect has asignificant <str<strong>on</strong>g>influence</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> plantlets neoformati<strong>on</strong> in thisspecies, occurring differences statistically assured.Regarding the interacti<strong>on</strong> between phytohorm<strong>on</strong>es <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s, plantlets neoformati<strong>on</strong> showed valuesbetween 41,90 to GA3 1 mg/l <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 89% for ANA 2,5mg/l, at a high amplitude of 48,10%. Regarding theeffect of combinati<strong>on</strong>s of phytohorm<strong>on</strong>es <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> theirc<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> the shoots neoformati<strong>on</strong> fromDianthus barbatus, is noted that statistically assuredthere are real differences between both unilateraleffects of these factors combined, while the variati<strong>on</strong>was very low due explants.Given the cumulative effect of phytohorm<strong>on</strong>es<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s of different combinati<strong>on</strong>s, plantletsrooting rate for D. barbatus showed values rangingfrom 36% for the combinati<strong>on</strong> 2,4-D/BA at a combinedc<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> of 1,5 mg/l <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 96,60% for combinati<strong>on</strong>ANA/GA3 at the total c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> of 5 mg/l, at avery high amplitude of 60,60%.Changing horm<strong>on</strong>al balance for thecombinati<strong>on</strong>s of phytohorm<strong>on</strong>es had a major <str<strong>on</strong>g>influence</str<strong>on</strong>g>,significant <strong>on</strong> rooting process. The highest differencesbetween combinati<strong>on</strong>s of phytohorm<strong>on</strong>es is observed atTable 3Table 4c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s of 1 mg/l <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the lowest deviati<strong>on</strong>s atthe c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> of 5 mg/l.AcknowledgementThis work was published during the project“POSTDOCTORAL SCHOOL OF AGRICULTUREAND VETERINARY MEDICINE",POSDRU/89/1.5/S/62371, co-financed by theEuropean Social Fund through the SectorialOperati<strong>on</strong>al Programme for the Human ResourcesDevelopment 2007-2013.References1. Brar MS, Al-khayri M, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Klingaman GL (1995).Effect of thidiazur<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> benzylaminopurine <strong>on</strong> in<str<strong>on</strong>g>vitro</str<strong>on</strong>g> shoot proliferati<strong>on</strong> of carnati<strong>on</strong> (Dianthuscaryophyllus L.). Proc. Arkansas Academy Sci. 49: 30-33.2. Casanova E, Moysset L, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Trillas MI (2008).Effect of agar c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> vessel closure <strong>on</strong> theorganogenesis <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> hyperhydricity of adventitiouscarnati<strong>on</strong> shoots. Biol. Plantarum. 52(1): 1-83. Kanwar JK <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Kumar S (2009). <str<strong>on</strong>g>In</str<strong>on</strong>g>fluence ofgrowth regulators <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> explants <strong>on</strong> shoot regenerati<strong>on</strong> incarnati<strong>on</strong>. Hort. Sci. 36: 140-146,4. Pareek A, Kantia A, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Kothari SL (2004). <str<strong>on</strong>g>In</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>vitro</str<strong>on</strong>g>cl<strong>on</strong>ing of <strong>ornamental</strong> species of Dianthus. <str<strong>on</strong>g>In</str<strong>on</strong>g>dian J.Biotechnol. 3: 263-266.5. Salehi 2006 Salehi H (2006). Can a general shootproliferati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> rooting medium be used for a numberof carnati<strong>on</strong> cultivars?. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 5: 25-30.205