View File - Development Services - City of Oxnard
View File - Development Services - City of Oxnard View File - Development Services - City of Oxnard
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTThese users represent a potential market for high quality (unblended permeate) water thatcould be provided in lieu of unblended CMWD water (Procter and Gamble) or blended Citywater (all other users) and could help eliminate concentrate discharges to the sanitarysewer.3.2.4 Agricultural DemandsAgricultural demands for irrigation water from the PTP and PVCWD systems, andagricultural pumping demand in the areas of the Ocean View pipeline and Duck Club aredescribed below. Historical wet, average, and dry-year demands for surface water andgroundwater for each of these systems and areas are provided in Table 3-4 and illustrated inFigures 3-10 and 3-11. Figure 3-10 illustrates the surface water and pumping demands foreach of these systems and areas by month. Figure 3-11 aggregates the surface water andpumping to show the total demands by month. Average demands are based onapproximately 10 to 15 years of data from the late 1980s through the early 2000s. Dry-yeardemands are from 1990 data, and wet-year demands are from 1998 data.Future agricultural irrigation demands are not expected to change significantly in theOxnard Plain and Pleasant Valley areas. The Save Open-space and Agricultural Resources(SOAR) initiative will likely limit any urbanization in the area until at least 2015. The SOARinitiative requires a majority vote by the public to implement a land use change in the localGeneral Plan. In Ventura County, open space, agriculture, and rural land are specificallyprotected by the SOAR initiative.PTP and PVCWD SystemsAgricultural irrigation demands on the PTP and PVCWD systems vary climatically andseasonally as described below.Climatic Cycles. Climactic cycles encompass changes in the weather, primarily associatedwith the amount of annual rainfall. During dry years, groundwater pumping tends todominate demand because there is little to no surface water available for delivery. During awet year, surface water deliveries tend to dominate; and groundwater pumping is reduced.Dry-weather years tend to have higher total demands. Based on the approximately 10 to15 years of data from the late 1980s through the early 2000s, the average-year total PTP andPVCWD demands (surface water plus groundwater) were approximately 8,200 and23,000 AFY, respectively. For the PTP, 35 percent of this demand was from groundwater;and 65 percent was from surface water. For the PVCWD system, 48 percent was fromgroundwater; and 52 percent was from surface water. Based on recent data:• The dry-year (1990) pumping rates were 19 times higher than the wet-year (1998)pumping rates for the PTP and 5 times higher for the PVCWD system.• The dry-year (1990) surface water deliveries were 35 times higher than the wet-year(1998) deliveries for the PTP and 16 times higher for the PVCWD system.These data demonstrate that little surface water is available during dry years requiringgrowers to rely on groundwater. These dry years will result in cumulative reductions ingroundwater elevations because groundwater demand will exceed replenishment to theaquifer system. This is particularly true in the LAS that suffers the most severe effects ofW112003002SCO LW1458.DOC/ 033390002 43
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORToverdraft on the southern Oxnard Plain and Pleasant Valley areas, as described inSection 2.0. As noted above, the 5 PTP wells and 11 PVCWD wells are completed in the LASin this area.Seasonal Cycles. Seasonal irrigation demands vary dramatically, unlike municipal andindustrial demands, which are more steady. Demands are much higher during the primarygrowing season, which occurs in the spring, fall, and summer months. For average to wetyears, the summer demands are approximately two to three times those of winter demands.For the PTP, the average-year demand varies from approximately 320 acre-feet per month inJanuary to approximately 970 acre-feet per month in August. For the PVCWD, the averageyeardemand varies from approximately 1,127 acre-feet per month in January toapproximately 2,036 acre-feet per month in August.Ocean View Pipeline and Duck Club AreasAgricultural demand from private pumping associated growers along the Ocean Viewpipeline averages about 3,400 AFY. Crops are similar to the PTP and seasonal demand alsomimics that of the PTP. Agricultural demand in the vicinity of the Duck Club averagesabout 5,000 AFY. Crops are significantly different from the PTP and Ocean View areas, withsod representing the highest acreage, and barley grown for the Duck Club the next highest.Climatic and seasonal variations are in agricultural pumping in the Ocean View pipelineand Duck Club areas are assumed to be similar to those of the PTP and PVCWD system.Combined User AnalysisThe combined agricultural demands for users of irrigation water from the PTP and PVCWDsystems, and agricultural pumping demand in the areas of the Ocean View pipeline andDuck Club are summarized in Table 3-4 and illustrated in Figure 3-1. The total average-yeardemand is approximately 39,500 AFY, with approximately 56 percent of that demand fromgroundwater (22,200 AFY) and 44 percent of that demand from surface water (17,400 AFY).The groundwater demand is approximately four times higher in dry years (38,251 AFY)than in wet years (9,210 AFY).3.3 Need for Water Supply Elements of the GREAT ProgramThis section describes the rationale and need for the water supply elements of the GREATProgram. As described above, approximately half of the current water demand of the City(25,966 AFY in 2000) is met by groundwater (11,181 AFY) and half is met by importedsurface water (13,249). Based on a comprehensive linear regression water demand analysis(which included calculating unit demand factors by land use zoning designations containedwithin the approved 2020 General Plan) the City estimates that an additional 21,383 AFYwill be required to meet the estimated demand of 44,565 AFY in 2020. Current supply isinsufficient to meet current demand, much less increasing future demand. Regardless of thepopulation numbers that the City will adopt in its updated general plan, it is certain that thedemand will far exceed currently available supply. Significant limitations exist to meetingthese demands with current supply sources. Increased reliance on these current supplies isnot feasible and would have the following detrimental effects:W112003002SCO LW1458.DOC/ 033390002 44
- Page 27 and 28: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTThe
- Page 29 and 30: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTThe
- Page 31 and 32: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTres
- Page 33 and 34: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTPum
- Page 35 and 36: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTdis
- Page 37 and 38: Figure 2-1Groundwater Basins and th
- Page 39 and 40: Figure 2-3Groundwater Basins andUWC
- Page 41 and 42: 604020Precipitation (inches)0-20189
- Page 43 and 44: Note: Generalized surficial geology
- Page 45 and 46: (a) Groundwater Elevation Monitorin
- Page 47 and 48: Figure 2-11DWR 1976Schematic CrossS
- Page 49 and 50: 02N22W12R01S02N22W22M04SVineyard Av
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 2-15USGS Groundwater LevelHy
- Page 53 and 54: Figure 2-17USGS Groundwater LevelHy
- Page 55 and 56: (a) Groundwater Elevations, LAS, Sp
- Page 57 and 58: (a) Total Dissolved Solids, UAS, 20
- Page 59 and 60: (a) Chloride Concentrations, Oxnard
- Page 61 and 62: Figure 2-25Subsidence onthe Oxnard
- Page 63 and 64: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTAgr
- Page 65 and 66: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTto
- Page 67 and 68: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTOxn
- Page 69 and 70: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTGro
- Page 71 and 72: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORThis
- Page 73 and 74: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTsou
- Page 75 and 76: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTPro
- Page 77: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTPro
- Page 81 and 82: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTout
- Page 83 and 84: TABLE 3-2City Blended Water Quality
- Page 85 and 86: TABLE 3-4Agricultural Water Supply
- Page 87 and 88: Figure 3-1NNo ScaleOxnard Plain Wat
- Page 89 and 90: Figure 3-3Santa Clara RiverFlow and
- Page 91 and 92: Figure 3-5Agriculture andPumping al
- Page 93 and 94: Figure 3-7Agriculture and Pumpingal
- Page 95 and 96: 50,00045,00040,00035,000Supply and
- Page 97 and 98: Acre-Feet6,0005,0004,0003,0002,0001
- Page 99 and 100: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT4.1
- Page 101 and 102: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTSea
- Page 103 and 104: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTfro
- Page 105 and 106: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTcar
- Page 107 and 108: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTirr
- Page 109: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORThyd
- Page 112 and 113: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT•
- Page 114 and 115: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTRec
- Page 116 and 117: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTdes
- Page 118 and 119: Hwy 101 - Ventura FwyCamarilloVentu
- Page 120 and 121: 101 FreewayVentura RoadCaminoDel So
- Page 122 and 123: WELL#21WELL#22WELL#20WELL #23BLENDI
- Page 124 and 125: 5.0 Historical Groundwater Flow Mod
- Page 126 and 127: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTcli
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORToverdraft on the southern <strong>Oxnard</strong> Plain and Pleasant Valley areas, as described inSection 2.0. As noted above, the 5 PTP wells and 11 PVCWD wells are completed in the LASin this area.Seasonal Cycles. Seasonal irrigation demands vary dramatically, unlike municipal andindustrial demands, which are more steady. Demands are much higher during the primarygrowing season, which occurs in the spring, fall, and summer months. For average to wetyears, the summer demands are approximately two to three times those <strong>of</strong> winter demands.For the PTP, the average-year demand varies from approximately 320 acre-feet per month inJanuary to approximately 970 acre-feet per month in August. For the PVCWD, the averageyeardemand varies from approximately 1,127 acre-feet per month in January toapproximately 2,036 acre-feet per month in August.Ocean <strong>View</strong> Pipeline and Duck Club AreasAgricultural demand from private pumping associated growers along the Ocean <strong>View</strong>pipeline averages about 3,400 AFY. Crops are similar to the PTP and seasonal demand alsomimics that <strong>of</strong> the PTP. Agricultural demand in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the Duck Club averagesabout 5,000 AFY. Crops are significantly different from the PTP and Ocean <strong>View</strong> areas, withsod representing the highest acreage, and barley grown for the Duck Club the next highest.Climatic and seasonal variations are in agricultural pumping in the Ocean <strong>View</strong> pipelineand Duck Club areas are assumed to be similar to those <strong>of</strong> the PTP and PVCWD system.Combined User AnalysisThe combined agricultural demands for users <strong>of</strong> irrigation water from the PTP and PVCWDsystems, and agricultural pumping demand in the areas <strong>of</strong> the Ocean <strong>View</strong> pipeline andDuck Club are summarized in Table 3-4 and illustrated in Figure 3-1. The total average-yeardemand is approximately 39,500 AFY, with approximately 56 percent <strong>of</strong> that demand fromgroundwater (22,200 AFY) and 44 percent <strong>of</strong> that demand from surface water (17,400 AFY).The groundwater demand is approximately four times higher in dry years (38,251 AFY)than in wet years (9,210 AFY).3.3 Need for Water Supply Elements <strong>of</strong> the GREAT ProgramThis section describes the rationale and need for the water supply elements <strong>of</strong> the GREATProgram. As described above, approximately half <strong>of</strong> the current water demand <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong>(25,966 AFY in 2000) is met by groundwater (11,181 AFY) and half is met by importedsurface water (13,249). Based on a comprehensive linear regression water demand analysis(which included calculating unit demand factors by land use zoning designations containedwithin the approved 2020 General Plan) the <strong>City</strong> estimates that an additional 21,383 AFYwill be required to meet the estimated demand <strong>of</strong> 44,565 AFY in 2020. Current supply isinsufficient to meet current demand, much less increasing future demand. Regardless <strong>of</strong> thepopulation numbers that the <strong>City</strong> will adopt in its updated general plan, it is certain that thedemand will far exceed currently available supply. Significant limitations exist to meetingthese demands with current supply sources. Increased reliance on these current supplies isnot feasible and would have the following detrimental effects:W112003002SCO LW1458.DOC/ 033390002 44