WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTOcean <strong>View</strong> Pipeline AreaAs noted above, the OVMWD currently serves potable water to domestic and agriculturalusers on the <strong>Oxnard</strong> Plain via the Ocean <strong>View</strong> pipeline, a <strong>City</strong>-owned facility. The Ocean<strong>View</strong> pipeline in Figure 3-7 shows crop types and pumping along the Ocean <strong>View</strong> pipeline.The source <strong>of</strong> water to the Ocean <strong>View</strong> pipeline is groundwater delivered by the O-Hpipeline. The quality <strong>of</strong> water would be similar to that as shown in Table 3-1 for UWCDgroundwater quality from the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oxnard</strong> 2000 Consumer Confidence Report. Onaverage, the TDS <strong>of</strong> this water would be approximately 1,100 mg/L.Duck Club AreaThe Ventura County Game Preserve, <strong>of</strong>ten referred to as "The Duck Club," usesgroundwater to maintain its ponds and associated agricultural areas. Figure 3-8 showscrop types and pumping in the Duck Club area. The quality <strong>of</strong> pumped groundwater isvariable with individual well (Figure 2-21).3.2 Local Water Demands3.2.1 <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oxnard</strong>The Water System Master Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> (<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oxnard</strong>, 2003) documents the existingand projected water supplies and demands <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> and includes recommendations forcapital and operational improvements that would be necessary to accommodate <strong>City</strong> needsto the year 2020. As previously described, the <strong>City</strong> has three sources <strong>of</strong> water available toserve its customers. These include (1) imported surface water from CMWD, (2) groundwaterfrom UWCD, and (3) local groundwater from <strong>City</strong> wells. The <strong>City</strong> blends the higher qualityimported water (~300 mg/L TDS) with groundwater (~1,100 mg/L) on a one-to-one basis toprovide a balance between quality and cost.The current <strong>City</strong> population <strong>of</strong> approximately 182,027 (DOF, 2002) significantly exceeds thecurrent <strong>City</strong> General Plan estimated 2020 population <strong>of</strong> 164,936, in spite <strong>of</strong> the fact that thearea covered by the current General Plan has not been completely built out yet. Otherregional planning agencies, such as the Southern California Association <strong>of</strong> Government(SCAG), have also underestimated the amount <strong>of</strong> growth that the <strong>City</strong> would experience.The future water demands <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> were estimated in the Water System Master Planthrough a comprehensive linear regression water demand analysis, which includedcalculating unit demand factors and land use zoning designations contained within theapproved 2020 General Plan. Estimates were developed <strong>of</strong> unit demand factors fromsingle-family residential, multifamily residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, and<strong>City</strong> users from historical use data. The projected water demands and available suppliesthrough 2020 are summarized below:W112003002SCO LW1458.DOC/ 033390002 39
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTProjected Water Demands and Supplies for <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oxnard</strong>(AFY)2000 2005 2010 2015 2020Demand 25,966 31,081 35,730 40,380 44,565Supplies<strong>City</strong> Groundwater Allocation a 5,879 5,568 5,255 5,255 5,255UWCD Groundwater Suballocation 5,302 4,990 4,678 4,678 4,678CMWD Imported Water Supplies b 13,249 13,249 13,249 13,249 13,249Total Water Supplies c 24,430 23,807 23,182 23,182 23,182Additional Water Supplies Required d 1,536 7,274 12,548 17,198 21,383Supply Total 25,966 31,081 35,730 40,380 44,565a Assumes not additional allocation is granted.b Based on 90 percent <strong>of</strong> maximum demand from 1990-2000, consistent with proposed CMWD rate structure.c Total annual water allocation excluding groundwater credits.d Additional allocation needed to meet the projected demand.Approximately one-half <strong>of</strong> the current supply is from groundwater, and one-half is fromimported surface water. These water supply resources will not keep pace with theincreasing demand. The estimated additional supplies will steadily increase to an estimateddeficit <strong>of</strong> 21,383 AFY required to meet the estimated demand <strong>of</strong> 44,565 AFY in 2020. Thecurrent and future supplies, and estimated additional supplies required to meet the 2020demands <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> are illustrated in Figure 3-9. Significant limitations exist to meetingthese demands with current supply sources, which are described below.GroundwaterAs discussed above, FCGMA restricts the reliance <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> on local groundwater supplies,including both those developed from the <strong>City</strong> wells and those purchased from the UWCD.While the <strong>City</strong> can pump groundwater above its FCGMA allocation, it must pay asubstantial pumping assessment penalty to do so. Under the present FCGMA regulatorylimitations, the <strong>City</strong> is also required to reduce its groundwater use by an additional10 percent over the next decade (5 percent in 2005 and 10 percent in 2010). In recent years,the <strong>City</strong> has relied upon accumulated unpumped FCGMA groundwater allocation (credits)and additional purchases from CMWD to meet the growing demand <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong>. However,once the FCGMA groundwater credits have been exhausted, the <strong>City</strong> would be required topay a pumping assessment penalty <strong>of</strong> $725 per acre-foot, in addition to the actual pumpingcharges, which in current dollars is somewhere between $850 and $1,000/acre-foot. Inaddition, pumping <strong>of</strong> groundwater exceeding FCGMA restrictions would contribute to thecontinuation or worsening <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> overdraft conditions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oxnard</strong> Plain andPleasant Valley aquifers. As described in Section 2.0, overdraft has historically resulted ingroundwater storage reductions, declining groundwater levels to below sea level, waterquality degradation, and ground subsidence.W112003002SCO LW1458.DOC/ 033390002 40
- Page 4 and 5:
CONTENTS6.2.2 Base Case and Phase 1
- Page 6 and 7:
CONTENTSFiguresSection 1.0 - Introd
- Page 8 and 9:
AcronymsACPAFYASRAWTFBasin PlanbgsB
- Page 10:
1.0 IntroductionThis Technical Repo
- Page 13 and 14:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT•
- Page 15 and 16:
SANTA BARBARACOUNTYSanta BarbaraVEN
- Page 17 and 18:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT2.2
- Page 19 and 20:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTmul
- Page 21 and 22:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT2.4
- Page 23 and 24: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTof
- Page 25 and 26: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTFor
- Page 27 and 28: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTThe
- Page 29 and 30: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTThe
- Page 31 and 32: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTres
- Page 33 and 34: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTPum
- Page 35 and 36: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTdis
- Page 37 and 38: Figure 2-1Groundwater Basins and th
- Page 39 and 40: Figure 2-3Groundwater Basins andUWC
- Page 41 and 42: 604020Precipitation (inches)0-20189
- Page 43 and 44: Note: Generalized surficial geology
- Page 45 and 46: (a) Groundwater Elevation Monitorin
- Page 47 and 48: Figure 2-11DWR 1976Schematic CrossS
- Page 49 and 50: 02N22W12R01S02N22W22M04SVineyard Av
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 2-15USGS Groundwater LevelHy
- Page 53 and 54: Figure 2-17USGS Groundwater LevelHy
- Page 55 and 56: (a) Groundwater Elevations, LAS, Sp
- Page 57 and 58: (a) Total Dissolved Solids, UAS, 20
- Page 59 and 60: (a) Chloride Concentrations, Oxnard
- Page 61 and 62: Figure 2-25Subsidence onthe Oxnard
- Page 63 and 64: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTAgr
- Page 65 and 66: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTto
- Page 67 and 68: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTOxn
- Page 69 and 70: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTGro
- Page 71 and 72: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORThis
- Page 73: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTsou
- Page 77 and 78: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTPro
- Page 79 and 80: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTove
- Page 81 and 82: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTout
- Page 83 and 84: TABLE 3-2City Blended Water Quality
- Page 85 and 86: TABLE 3-4Agricultural Water Supply
- Page 87 and 88: Figure 3-1NNo ScaleOxnard Plain Wat
- Page 89 and 90: Figure 3-3Santa Clara RiverFlow and
- Page 91 and 92: Figure 3-5Agriculture andPumping al
- Page 93 and 94: Figure 3-7Agriculture and Pumpingal
- Page 95 and 96: 50,00045,00040,00035,000Supply and
- Page 97 and 98: Acre-Feet6,0005,0004,0003,0002,0001
- Page 99 and 100: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT4.1
- Page 101 and 102: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTSea
- Page 103 and 104: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTfro
- Page 105 and 106: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTcar
- Page 107 and 108: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTirr
- Page 109: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORThyd
- Page 112 and 113: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT•
- Page 114 and 115: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTRec
- Page 116 and 117: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTdes
- Page 118 and 119: Hwy 101 - Ventura FwyCamarilloVentu
- Page 120 and 121: 101 FreewayVentura RoadCaminoDel So
- Page 122 and 123: WELL#21WELL#22WELL#20WELL #23BLENDI
- Page 124 and 125:
5.0 Historical Groundwater Flow Mod
- Page 126 and 127:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTcli
- Page 128 and 129:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT•
- Page 130 and 131:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT−
- Page 132 and 133:
SANTA BARBARACOUNTYSanta BarbaraVEN
- Page 134 and 135:
6.0 GREAT Program Groundwater FlowM
- Page 136 and 137:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTgro
- Page 138 and 139:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTto
- Page 140 and 141:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTGro
- Page 142 and 143:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT6.1
- Page 144 and 145:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTfor
- Page 146 and 147:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTin
- Page 148 and 149:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT•
- Page 150 and 151:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT−
- Page 152 and 153:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTtwo
- Page 154 and 155:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTThe
- Page 156 and 157:
TABLE 6-1Scenarios for Model Simula
- Page 158 and 159:
100Cumulative Departure from Mean20
- Page 160 and 161:
15060Elevation (feet, msl)00Rainfal
- Page 162 and 163:
5833aPci f ic5O c55185e a n51513552
- Page 164 and 165:
-100406080700-40-20406050-103001402
- Page 166 and 167:
400-402030-50010-30-10-60-20-30-107
- Page 168 and 169:
-20400-40103020-500-10-30-20-401200
- Page 170 and 171:
0-10-204030-40-50-30-1001020-20-40-
- Page 172 and 173:
0-204030-40-6001020-30-10-20-30-50-
- Page 174 and 175:
North Oxnard Plain Area6 7 8 901N22
- Page 176 and 177:
10040608070504010901001201401701601
- Page 178 and 179:
14050809030506070104001030100120901
- Page 180 and 181:
10080507060401001201401701802001501
- Page 182 and 183:
01005070601601201108070906050210180
- Page 184 and 185:
70140509070601040501020901101401701
- Page 186 and 187:
Oxnard Forebay Area1 2 3 402N22W 12
- Page 188 and 189:
South Oxnard Plain Area11 12 13 140
- Page 190 and 191:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTtho
- Page 192 and 193:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT7.2
- Page 194 and 195:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTRed
- Page 196 and 197:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT•
- Page 198:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTKen