WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT−In the LAS, these small declines are attributed mostly to drawdown from theextractions at the <strong>City</strong> Water Yard and, consequently, will have no significant effect.These changes will result in the following reductions in overdraft:• For the UAS, the average height above the coastal water level goal will remainapproximately the same, 5.9 feet for Scenario 1a compared to 5.7 feet for the Base Case.• For the LAS, the reduction in overdraft will be 6 percent compared to the Base Case.6.2.3 Phase 2 ScenariosThe simulated third quarter 2020 groundwater levels for the Phase 2 scenarios, and thefirst/third average quarter 2020 water level differences, or changes, between the Base Caseand each <strong>of</strong> the Phase 2 scenarios are provided in the following figures:• Scenario 2a: Figures 6-17 and 6-18, UAS and LAS, respectively• Scenario 2b: Figures 6-19 and 6-20, UAS and LAS, respectively• Scenario 2c: Figures 6-21 and 6-22, UAS and LAS, respectively• Scenario 2c2: Figures 6-25 and 6-26, UAS and LAS, respectively (2020)In addition, simulated first quarter 2020 groundwater levels for Scenario 2c are provided inFigures 6-23 and 6-24 for the UAS and LAS, respectively. The purpose <strong>of</strong> these additionalwater-level only figures is to illustrate the groundwater elevations at the end <strong>of</strong> the winterinjection quarter for the seawater intrusion barrier wells.Hydrographs <strong>of</strong> the historical and simulated groundwater levels for each <strong>of</strong> the keyevaluation wells (Figure 6-2) are provided in Figure 6-27 for each <strong>of</strong> the Phase 2 scenarios.Similar to Phase 1, the hydrographs are grouped into three areas, one area for each <strong>of</strong> thethree pages <strong>of</strong> hydrographs:• <strong>Oxnard</strong> Forebay Area (page 1 <strong>of</strong> 3)• North <strong>Oxnard</strong> Plain area (page 2 <strong>of</strong> 3)• South <strong>Oxnard</strong> Plain are (page 3 <strong>of</strong> 3)Scenario 2aScenario 2a results in the following changes relative to the Base Case:• Large rise in groundwater elevations over broad areas across the southern <strong>Oxnard</strong> Plainand Pleasant Valley areas, mostly in the LAS, as a result <strong>of</strong> delivering 19,286 AFY <strong>of</strong>recycled water to growers (Ocean <strong>View</strong> pipeline, PTP system, PVCWD system) in lieu <strong>of</strong>those growers pumping groundwater. Water levels increased up to 30 feet in the UASand up to 60 feet in the LAS. These water level increases will result in the following:−−In the UAS, these increases will significantly help to further minimize the alreadylow potential that exists for coastal landward flow.In the LAS, this water level rise will significantly help to decrease the severeoverdraft conditions and water quality degradation that exist in the LAS <strong>of</strong> thesouthern <strong>Oxnard</strong> Plain.W112003002SCO LW1458.DOC/ 033390002 89
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT• Moderate decline in groundwater elevations in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> Water Yard in theUAS and LAS as a result <strong>of</strong> extracting 15,429 AFY (80 percent) <strong>of</strong> the 19,286 AFY <strong>of</strong>in-lieu recharge from the <strong>City</strong> Water Yard wells: two LAS wells (Nos. 20 and 21),two UAS wells (Nos. 22 and 23), and three UAS wells. Water levels decreased up to30 feet in the UAS and up to 15 feet in the LAS in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> Water Yard,and decreased up to 20 feet in the UAS and up to 10 feet across the northern <strong>Oxnard</strong>Plain. These water level decreases will result in the following:−−In the UAS, these moderate decreases, combined with the declines from the UWCDEl Rio wellfield extractions, will increase the potential to induce brief periods <strong>of</strong>coastal landward flow during extended, drier climatic periods (see Scenario 2chydrograph for coastal well 05G02, which twice briefly drops below sea level forsimulation period [Figure 6-27]).In the LAS, these moderate decreases will increase the moderate potential forlandward flow that exists, particularly during drier years and in the fall when waterlevels are seasonally low.• Moderate decline in groundwater elevations in the Forebay area as a result <strong>of</strong> extracting3,857 AFY (20 percent) <strong>of</strong> the 19,286 AFY <strong>of</strong> in-lieu recharge from the UWCD El Riowellfield. Water levels decreased up to 20 feet in the UAS and up to 10 feet in the LAS.The water level decline in the LAS is mostly due to interference from drawdown at the<strong>City</strong> Water Yard. These water level decreases will result in the following:−−In the UAS, these moderate declines will not interfere with pumping operations atthe Forebay spreading grounds. However, combined with the declines from <strong>City</strong>Water Yard extractions, these moderate declines will contribute to the increasedpotential to induce brief periods <strong>of</strong> coastal landward flow during extended, drierclimatic periods (see Scenario 2a hydrograph for coastal well 05G02, which twicebriefly drops below sea level for simulation period [Figure 6-27]).In the LAS, these small declines are attributed mostly to drawdown from theextractions at the <strong>City</strong> Water Yard and, consequently, will have no significant effect.These changes will result in the following reductions in overdraft:• For the UAS, the average height above the coastal water level goal will decrease to3.8 feet compared to 5.7 feet for the Base Case.• For the LAS, the reduction in overdraft will be 36 percent compared to the Base Case.Scenario 2bScenario 2b results in the following changes relative to the Base Case:• Virtually the same large rise in groundwater elevations across the southern <strong>Oxnard</strong>Plain and Pleasant Valley areas as for Scenario 2a (the in-lieu recharge assumptions arethe same for Scenarios 2a and 2b).• Small to moderate decline in groundwater elevations in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> WaterYard in the UAS and LAS as a result <strong>of</strong> extracting 3,857 AFY (20 percent) <strong>of</strong> the 19,286AFY <strong>of</strong> in-lieu recharge from the <strong>City</strong> Water Yard wells: two LAS wells (Nos. 20 and 21),W112003002SCO LW1458.DOC/ 033390002 90
- Page 4 and 5:
CONTENTS6.2.2 Base Case and Phase 1
- Page 6 and 7:
CONTENTSFiguresSection 1.0 - Introd
- Page 8 and 9:
AcronymsACPAFYASRAWTFBasin PlanbgsB
- Page 10:
1.0 IntroductionThis Technical Repo
- Page 13 and 14:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT•
- Page 15 and 16:
SANTA BARBARACOUNTYSanta BarbaraVEN
- Page 17 and 18:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT2.2
- Page 19 and 20:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTmul
- Page 21 and 22:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT2.4
- Page 23 and 24:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTof
- Page 25 and 26:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTFor
- Page 27 and 28:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTThe
- Page 29 and 30:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTThe
- Page 31 and 32:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTres
- Page 33 and 34:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTPum
- Page 35 and 36:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTdis
- Page 37 and 38:
Figure 2-1Groundwater Basins and th
- Page 39 and 40:
Figure 2-3Groundwater Basins andUWC
- Page 41 and 42:
604020Precipitation (inches)0-20189
- Page 43 and 44:
Note: Generalized surficial geology
- Page 45 and 46:
(a) Groundwater Elevation Monitorin
- Page 47 and 48:
Figure 2-11DWR 1976Schematic CrossS
- Page 49 and 50:
02N22W12R01S02N22W22M04SVineyard Av
- Page 51 and 52:
Figure 2-15USGS Groundwater LevelHy
- Page 53 and 54:
Figure 2-17USGS Groundwater LevelHy
- Page 55 and 56:
(a) Groundwater Elevations, LAS, Sp
- Page 57 and 58:
(a) Total Dissolved Solids, UAS, 20
- Page 59 and 60:
(a) Chloride Concentrations, Oxnard
- Page 61 and 62:
Figure 2-25Subsidence onthe Oxnard
- Page 63 and 64:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTAgr
- Page 65 and 66:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTto
- Page 67 and 68:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTOxn
- Page 69 and 70:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTGro
- Page 71 and 72:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORThis
- Page 73 and 74:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTsou
- Page 75 and 76:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTPro
- Page 77 and 78:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTPro
- Page 79 and 80:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTove
- Page 81 and 82:
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTout
- Page 83 and 84:
TABLE 3-2City Blended Water Quality
- Page 85 and 86:
TABLE 3-4Agricultural Water Supply
- Page 87 and 88:
Figure 3-1NNo ScaleOxnard Plain Wat
- Page 89 and 90:
Figure 3-3Santa Clara RiverFlow and
- Page 91 and 92:
Figure 3-5Agriculture andPumping al
- Page 93 and 94:
Figure 3-7Agriculture and Pumpingal
- Page 95 and 96:
50,00045,00040,00035,000Supply and
- Page 97 and 98:
Acre-Feet6,0005,0004,0003,0002,0001
- Page 99 and 100: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT4.1
- Page 101 and 102: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTSea
- Page 103 and 104: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTfro
- Page 105 and 106: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTcar
- Page 107 and 108: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTirr
- Page 109: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORThyd
- Page 112 and 113: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT•
- Page 114 and 115: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTRec
- Page 116 and 117: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTdes
- Page 118 and 119: Hwy 101 - Ventura FwyCamarilloVentu
- Page 120 and 121: 101 FreewayVentura RoadCaminoDel So
- Page 122 and 123: WELL#21WELL#22WELL#20WELL #23BLENDI
- Page 124 and 125: 5.0 Historical Groundwater Flow Mod
- Page 126 and 127: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTcli
- Page 128 and 129: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT•
- Page 130 and 131: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT−
- Page 132 and 133: SANTA BARBARACOUNTYSanta BarbaraVEN
- Page 134 and 135: 6.0 GREAT Program Groundwater FlowM
- Page 136 and 137: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTgro
- Page 138 and 139: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTto
- Page 140 and 141: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTGro
- Page 142 and 143: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT6.1
- Page 144 and 145: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTfor
- Page 146 and 147: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTin
- Page 148 and 149: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT•
- Page 152 and 153: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTtwo
- Page 154 and 155: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTThe
- Page 156 and 157: TABLE 6-1Scenarios for Model Simula
- Page 158 and 159: 100Cumulative Departure from Mean20
- Page 160 and 161: 15060Elevation (feet, msl)00Rainfal
- Page 162 and 163: 5833aPci f ic5O c55185e a n51513552
- Page 164 and 165: -100406080700-40-20406050-103001402
- Page 166 and 167: 400-402030-50010-30-10-60-20-30-107
- Page 168 and 169: -20400-40103020-500-10-30-20-401200
- Page 170 and 171: 0-10-204030-40-50-30-1001020-20-40-
- Page 172 and 173: 0-204030-40-6001020-30-10-20-30-50-
- Page 174 and 175: North Oxnard Plain Area6 7 8 901N22
- Page 176 and 177: 10040608070504010901001201401701601
- Page 178 and 179: 14050809030506070104001030100120901
- Page 180 and 181: 10080507060401001201401701802001501
- Page 182 and 183: 01005070601601201108070906050210180
- Page 184 and 185: 70140509070601040501020901101401701
- Page 186 and 187: Oxnard Forebay Area1 2 3 402N22W 12
- Page 188 and 189: South Oxnard Plain Area11 12 13 140
- Page 190 and 191: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTtho
- Page 192 and 193: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT7.2
- Page 194 and 195: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTRed
- Page 196 and 197: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT•
- Page 198: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTKen