View File - Development Services - City of Oxnard
View File - Development Services - City of Oxnard View File - Development Services - City of Oxnard
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT• Small decline in groundwater elevations in the immediate vicinity of the City WaterYard in the UAS and LAS as a result of extracting 2,251 AFY (80 percent) of the2,814 AFY of in-lieu recharge from the four City Water Yard wells: two LAS wells(Nos. 20 and 21) and two UAS wells (Nos. 22 and 23). Water levels decreased up to 3 feetin the UAS and up to 6 feet in the LAS. These water level decreases will result in thefollowing:−−In the UAS, these small decreases will not significantly affect the low potential forcoastal landward flow, even during extended, drier climatic periods (see Scenario 1ahydrograph for coastal well 05G02, which remains above sea level for the simulationperiod [Figure 6-16]).In the LAS, these small decreases will incrementally increase the moderate potentialfor landward flow that exists, particularly during drier years and in the fall whenwater levels are seasonally low.• Imperceptible decline in groundwater elevations in the Forebay area as a result ofextracting 563 AFY (20 percent) of the 2,814 AFY of in-lieu recharge from the El Riowellfield.These changes will result in the following reductions in overdraft:• For the UAS, the average height above the coastal water level goal will remainapproximately the same, 5.8 feet for Scenario 1a compared to 5.7 feet for the Base Case.• For the LAS, the reduction in overdraft will be 4 percent compared to the Base Case.Scenario 1bScenario 1b results in the following changes relative to the Base Case:• Virtually the same small rise in groundwater elevations across the southern OxnardPlain and Pleasant Valley areas as for Scenario 1a (the in-lieu recharge assumptions arethe same for Scenarios 1a and 1b).• Almost imperceptible decline in groundwater elevations in the immediate vicinity of theCity Water Yard in the UAS and LAS as a result of extracting 563 AFY (20 percent) of the2,814 AFY of in-lieu recharge from the two City UAS wells (Nos. 22 and 23).• Small decline in groundwater elevations in the Forebay area as a result of extracting2,251 AFY (80 percent) of the 2,814 AFY of in-lieu recharge from the UWCD El Riowellfield. Water levels decreased up to 5 feet in the UAS and up to 2 feet in the LAS.These water level decreases will result in the following:−−In the UAS, these small declines will not interfere with pumping operations at theForebay spreading grounds or significantly affect the low potential for coastallandward flow at the coast (see Scenario 1b hydrograph for coastal well 05G02,which remains above sea level for simulation period [Figure 6-16]).In the LAS, these small declines will not significantly increase the moderate potentialfor landward flow that exists.W112003002SCO LW1458.DOC/ 033390002 87
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTThese changes will result in the following reductions in overdraft:• For the UAS, the average height above the coastal water level goal will remainapproximately the same, 5.8 feet for Scenario 1b compared to 5.7 feet for the Base Case.• For the LAS, the reduction in overdraft will be 6 percent compared to the Base Case.Scenario 1cScenario 1c results in the following changes relative to the Base Case:• Moderate to large rise in groundwater elevations at the Phase 1 pilot injection well in theLAS as a result of injecting 534 AFY at this location and tapering off to a moderate tosmall rise in groundwater elevations over broad areas across the southern Oxnard Plainand Pleasant Valley areas. Most of this is in the LAS, as a result of delivering 2,814 AFYof recycled water to growers (Ocean View pipeline and PTP system) in lieu of thosegrowers pumping groundwater. Water levels increased up to 25 feet in the LAS at theinjection well and up to 5 feet in the UAS across the southern Oxnard Plain and PleasantValley areas. These water level increases will result in the following:−−In the UAS, these increases will incrementally help to further minimize the alreadylow potential that exists for coastal landward flow.In the LAS, these increases will begin to significantly help reduce the severeoverdraft conditions and water quality degradation that exist in the LAS of thesouthern Oxnard Plain.• Small decline in groundwater elevations in the immediate vicinity of the City WaterYard in the UAS and LAS as a result of extracting 670 AFY (20 percent) of the 3,348 AFYof the direct injection and in-lieu recharge from the two City UAS wells (Nos. 22 and 23).Water levels decreased up to 3 feet in the UAS and up to 6 feet in the LAS. These waterlevel decreases will result in the following:−−In the UAS, these small decreases will not significantly affect the low potential forcoastal landward flow, even during extended, drier climatic periods (see Scenario 1chydrograph for coastal well 05G02 ,which remains above sea level for simulationperiod [Figure 6-16]).In the LAS, these water level declines will incrementally increase the moderatepotential for landward flow that exists, particularly during drier years and in the fallwhen water levels are seasonally low.• Small decline in groundwater elevations in the Forebay area as a result of extracting2,678 AFY (80 percent) of the 3,348 AFY of in-lieu recharge from the UWCD El Riowellfield. Water levels decreased up to 5 feet in the UAS and up to 3 feet in the LAS. Thewater level decline in the LAS is mostly due to interference from drawdown at the CityWater Yard. These water level decreases will result in the following:−In the UAS, these small declines will not interfere with pumping operations at theForebay spreading grounds or significantly affect the low potential for coastallandward flow at the coast (see Scenario 1c hydrograph for coastal well 05G02,which remains above sea level for simulation period [Figure 6-16]).W112003002SCO LW1458.DOC/ 033390002 88
- Page 97 and 98: Acre-Feet6,0005,0004,0003,0002,0001
- Page 99 and 100: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT4.1
- Page 101 and 102: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTSea
- Page 103 and 104: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTfro
- Page 105 and 106: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTcar
- Page 107 and 108: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTirr
- Page 109: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORThyd
- Page 112 and 113: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT•
- Page 114 and 115: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTRec
- Page 116 and 117: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTdes
- Page 118 and 119: Hwy 101 - Ventura FwyCamarilloVentu
- Page 120 and 121: 101 FreewayVentura RoadCaminoDel So
- Page 122 and 123: WELL#21WELL#22WELL#20WELL #23BLENDI
- Page 124 and 125: 5.0 Historical Groundwater Flow Mod
- Page 126 and 127: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTcli
- Page 128 and 129: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT•
- Page 130 and 131: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT−
- Page 132 and 133: SANTA BARBARACOUNTYSanta BarbaraVEN
- Page 134 and 135: 6.0 GREAT Program Groundwater FlowM
- Page 136 and 137: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTgro
- Page 138 and 139: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTto
- Page 140 and 141: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTGro
- Page 142 and 143: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT6.1
- Page 144 and 145: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTfor
- Page 146 and 147: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTin
- Page 150 and 151: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT−
- Page 152 and 153: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTtwo
- Page 154 and 155: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTThe
- Page 156 and 157: TABLE 6-1Scenarios for Model Simula
- Page 158 and 159: 100Cumulative Departure from Mean20
- Page 160 and 161: 15060Elevation (feet, msl)00Rainfal
- Page 162 and 163: 5833aPci f ic5O c55185e a n51513552
- Page 164 and 165: -100406080700-40-20406050-103001402
- Page 166 and 167: 400-402030-50010-30-10-60-20-30-107
- Page 168 and 169: -20400-40103020-500-10-30-20-401200
- Page 170 and 171: 0-10-204030-40-50-30-1001020-20-40-
- Page 172 and 173: 0-204030-40-6001020-30-10-20-30-50-
- Page 174 and 175: North Oxnard Plain Area6 7 8 901N22
- Page 176 and 177: 10040608070504010901001201401701601
- Page 178 and 179: 14050809030506070104001030100120901
- Page 180 and 181: 10080507060401001201401701802001501
- Page 182 and 183: 01005070601601201108070906050210180
- Page 184 and 185: 70140509070601040501020901101401701
- Page 186 and 187: Oxnard Forebay Area1 2 3 402N22W 12
- Page 188 and 189: South Oxnard Plain Area11 12 13 140
- Page 190 and 191: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTtho
- Page 192 and 193: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT7.2
- Page 194 and 195: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTRed
- Page 196 and 197: WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT•
WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTThese changes will result in the following reductions in overdraft:• For the UAS, the average height above the coastal water level goal will remainapproximately the same, 5.8 feet for Scenario 1b compared to 5.7 feet for the Base Case.• For the LAS, the reduction in overdraft will be 6 percent compared to the Base Case.Scenario 1cScenario 1c results in the following changes relative to the Base Case:• Moderate to large rise in groundwater elevations at the Phase 1 pilot injection well in theLAS as a result <strong>of</strong> injecting 534 AFY at this location and tapering <strong>of</strong>f to a moderate tosmall rise in groundwater elevations over broad areas across the southern <strong>Oxnard</strong> Plainand Pleasant Valley areas. Most <strong>of</strong> this is in the LAS, as a result <strong>of</strong> delivering 2,814 AFY<strong>of</strong> recycled water to growers (Ocean <strong>View</strong> pipeline and PTP system) in lieu <strong>of</strong> thosegrowers pumping groundwater. Water levels increased up to 25 feet in the LAS at theinjection well and up to 5 feet in the UAS across the southern <strong>Oxnard</strong> Plain and PleasantValley areas. These water level increases will result in the following:−−In the UAS, these increases will incrementally help to further minimize the alreadylow potential that exists for coastal landward flow.In the LAS, these increases will begin to significantly help reduce the severeoverdraft conditions and water quality degradation that exist in the LAS <strong>of</strong> thesouthern <strong>Oxnard</strong> Plain.• Small decline in groundwater elevations in the immediate vicinity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> WaterYard in the UAS and LAS as a result <strong>of</strong> extracting 670 AFY (20 percent) <strong>of</strong> the 3,348 AFY<strong>of</strong> the direct injection and in-lieu recharge from the two <strong>City</strong> UAS wells (Nos. 22 and 23).Water levels decreased up to 3 feet in the UAS and up to 6 feet in the LAS. These waterlevel decreases will result in the following:−−In the UAS, these small decreases will not significantly affect the low potential forcoastal landward flow, even during extended, drier climatic periods (see Scenario 1chydrograph for coastal well 05G02 ,which remains above sea level for simulationperiod [Figure 6-16]).In the LAS, these water level declines will incrementally increase the moderatepotential for landward flow that exists, particularly during drier years and in the fallwhen water levels are seasonally low.• Small decline in groundwater elevations in the Forebay area as a result <strong>of</strong> extracting2,678 AFY (80 percent) <strong>of</strong> the 3,348 AFY <strong>of</strong> in-lieu recharge from the UWCD El Riowellfield. Water levels decreased up to 5 feet in the UAS and up to 3 feet in the LAS. Thewater level decline in the LAS is mostly due to interference from drawdown at the <strong>City</strong>Water Yard. These water level decreases will result in the following:−In the UAS, these small declines will not interfere with pumping operations at theForebay spreading grounds or significantly affect the low potential for coastallandward flow at the coast (see Scenario 1c hydrograph for coastal well 05G02,which remains above sea level for simulation period [Figure 6-16]).W112003002SCO LW1458.DOC/ 033390002 88