View File - Development Services - City of Oxnard

View File - Development Services - City of Oxnard View File - Development Services - City of Oxnard

developmentservices.cityofoxnard.org
from developmentservices.cityofoxnard.org More from this publisher
13.07.2015 Views

WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT• Small decline in groundwater elevations in the immediate vicinity of the City WaterYard in the UAS and LAS as a result of extracting 2,251 AFY (80 percent) of the2,814 AFY of in-lieu recharge from the four City Water Yard wells: two LAS wells(Nos. 20 and 21) and two UAS wells (Nos. 22 and 23). Water levels decreased up to 3 feetin the UAS and up to 6 feet in the LAS. These water level decreases will result in thefollowing:−−In the UAS, these small decreases will not significantly affect the low potential forcoastal landward flow, even during extended, drier climatic periods (see Scenario 1ahydrograph for coastal well 05G02, which remains above sea level for the simulationperiod [Figure 6-16]).In the LAS, these small decreases will incrementally increase the moderate potentialfor landward flow that exists, particularly during drier years and in the fall whenwater levels are seasonally low.• Imperceptible decline in groundwater elevations in the Forebay area as a result ofextracting 563 AFY (20 percent) of the 2,814 AFY of in-lieu recharge from the El Riowellfield.These changes will result in the following reductions in overdraft:• For the UAS, the average height above the coastal water level goal will remainapproximately the same, 5.8 feet for Scenario 1a compared to 5.7 feet for the Base Case.• For the LAS, the reduction in overdraft will be 4 percent compared to the Base Case.Scenario 1bScenario 1b results in the following changes relative to the Base Case:• Virtually the same small rise in groundwater elevations across the southern OxnardPlain and Pleasant Valley areas as for Scenario 1a (the in-lieu recharge assumptions arethe same for Scenarios 1a and 1b).• Almost imperceptible decline in groundwater elevations in the immediate vicinity of theCity Water Yard in the UAS and LAS as a result of extracting 563 AFY (20 percent) of the2,814 AFY of in-lieu recharge from the two City UAS wells (Nos. 22 and 23).• Small decline in groundwater elevations in the Forebay area as a result of extracting2,251 AFY (80 percent) of the 2,814 AFY of in-lieu recharge from the UWCD El Riowellfield. Water levels decreased up to 5 feet in the UAS and up to 2 feet in the LAS.These water level decreases will result in the following:−−In the UAS, these small declines will not interfere with pumping operations at theForebay spreading grounds or significantly affect the low potential for coastallandward flow at the coast (see Scenario 1b hydrograph for coastal well 05G02,which remains above sea level for simulation period [Figure 6-16]).In the LAS, these small declines will not significantly increase the moderate potentialfor landward flow that exists.W112003002SCO LW1458.DOC/ 033390002 87

WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTThese changes will result in the following reductions in overdraft:• For the UAS, the average height above the coastal water level goal will remainapproximately the same, 5.8 feet for Scenario 1b compared to 5.7 feet for the Base Case.• For the LAS, the reduction in overdraft will be 6 percent compared to the Base Case.Scenario 1cScenario 1c results in the following changes relative to the Base Case:• Moderate to large rise in groundwater elevations at the Phase 1 pilot injection well in theLAS as a result of injecting 534 AFY at this location and tapering off to a moderate tosmall rise in groundwater elevations over broad areas across the southern Oxnard Plainand Pleasant Valley areas. Most of this is in the LAS, as a result of delivering 2,814 AFYof recycled water to growers (Ocean View pipeline and PTP system) in lieu of thosegrowers pumping groundwater. Water levels increased up to 25 feet in the LAS at theinjection well and up to 5 feet in the UAS across the southern Oxnard Plain and PleasantValley areas. These water level increases will result in the following:−−In the UAS, these increases will incrementally help to further minimize the alreadylow potential that exists for coastal landward flow.In the LAS, these increases will begin to significantly help reduce the severeoverdraft conditions and water quality degradation that exist in the LAS of thesouthern Oxnard Plain.• Small decline in groundwater elevations in the immediate vicinity of the City WaterYard in the UAS and LAS as a result of extracting 670 AFY (20 percent) of the 3,348 AFYof the direct injection and in-lieu recharge from the two City UAS wells (Nos. 22 and 23).Water levels decreased up to 3 feet in the UAS and up to 6 feet in the LAS. These waterlevel decreases will result in the following:−−In the UAS, these small decreases will not significantly affect the low potential forcoastal landward flow, even during extended, drier climatic periods (see Scenario 1chydrograph for coastal well 05G02 ,which remains above sea level for simulationperiod [Figure 6-16]).In the LAS, these water level declines will incrementally increase the moderatepotential for landward flow that exists, particularly during drier years and in the fallwhen water levels are seasonally low.• Small decline in groundwater elevations in the Forebay area as a result of extracting2,678 AFY (80 percent) of the 3,348 AFY of in-lieu recharge from the UWCD El Riowellfield. Water levels decreased up to 5 feet in the UAS and up to 3 feet in the LAS. Thewater level decline in the LAS is mostly due to interference from drawdown at the CityWater Yard. These water level decreases will result in the following:−In the UAS, these small declines will not interfere with pumping operations at theForebay spreading grounds or significantly affect the low potential for coastallandward flow at the coast (see Scenario 1c hydrograph for coastal well 05G02,which remains above sea level for simulation period [Figure 6-16]).W112003002SCO LW1458.DOC/ 033390002 88

WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT• Small decline in groundwater elevations in the immediate vicinity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> WaterYard in the UAS and LAS as a result <strong>of</strong> extracting 2,251 AFY (80 percent) <strong>of</strong> the2,814 AFY <strong>of</strong> in-lieu recharge from the four <strong>City</strong> Water Yard wells: two LAS wells(Nos. 20 and 21) and two UAS wells (Nos. 22 and 23). Water levels decreased up to 3 feetin the UAS and up to 6 feet in the LAS. These water level decreases will result in thefollowing:−−In the UAS, these small decreases will not significantly affect the low potential forcoastal landward flow, even during extended, drier climatic periods (see Scenario 1ahydrograph for coastal well 05G02, which remains above sea level for the simulationperiod [Figure 6-16]).In the LAS, these small decreases will incrementally increase the moderate potentialfor landward flow that exists, particularly during drier years and in the fall whenwater levels are seasonally low.• Imperceptible decline in groundwater elevations in the Forebay area as a result <strong>of</strong>extracting 563 AFY (20 percent) <strong>of</strong> the 2,814 AFY <strong>of</strong> in-lieu recharge from the El Riowellfield.These changes will result in the following reductions in overdraft:• For the UAS, the average height above the coastal water level goal will remainapproximately the same, 5.8 feet for Scenario 1a compared to 5.7 feet for the Base Case.• For the LAS, the reduction in overdraft will be 4 percent compared to the Base Case.Scenario 1bScenario 1b results in the following changes relative to the Base Case:• Virtually the same small rise in groundwater elevations across the southern <strong>Oxnard</strong>Plain and Pleasant Valley areas as for Scenario 1a (the in-lieu recharge assumptions arethe same for Scenarios 1a and 1b).• Almost imperceptible decline in groundwater elevations in the immediate vicinity <strong>of</strong> the<strong>City</strong> Water Yard in the UAS and LAS as a result <strong>of</strong> extracting 563 AFY (20 percent) <strong>of</strong> the2,814 AFY <strong>of</strong> in-lieu recharge from the two <strong>City</strong> UAS wells (Nos. 22 and 23).• Small decline in groundwater elevations in the Forebay area as a result <strong>of</strong> extracting2,251 AFY (80 percent) <strong>of</strong> the 2,814 AFY <strong>of</strong> in-lieu recharge from the UWCD El Riowellfield. Water levels decreased up to 5 feet in the UAS and up to 2 feet in the LAS.These water level decreases will result in the following:−−In the UAS, these small declines will not interfere with pumping operations at theForebay spreading grounds or significantly affect the low potential for coastallandward flow at the coast (see Scenario 1b hydrograph for coastal well 05G02,which remains above sea level for simulation period [Figure 6-16]).In the LAS, these small declines will not significantly increase the moderate potentialfor landward flow that exists.W112003002SCO LW1458.DOC/ 033390002 87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!