Gold Investor - SPDR Gold Shares
Gold Investor - SPDR Gold Shares Gold Investor - SPDR Gold Shares
The role of currencies in internationalportfolio managementForeign-exchange is a key area of focus within portfolio riskmanagement due to the fact that international allocation asa source of diversification has become a well-establishedpractice – especially after the 1970s and the adoption of modernportfolio theory. But every foreign investment exposes aninvestor to exchange-rate risk – whether large or small. 8In the 1990s, international diversification began to incorporateemerging markets alongside the more traditional developedmarkets. The trend toward global portfolios led to a drop indomestic equity bias among developed-market investorsbetween 1997 and 2010, from 78% to 48%. 9 From anexchange-rate perspective, allocation to assets denominatedoutside the major currencies – namely the US dollar, euro,pound sterling, Swiss franc and Japanese yen – albeit still small,doubled between 2002 and 2011. 10 Emerging markets havebeen beneficiaries of internationalisation over the last decade.A number of reasons underlie this trend including better growthopportunities, access to new products and new markets, andincreased issuance of government and corporate bonds. Inaddition, the lack of opportunities in developed markets, dueto low sovereign and corporate bond yields, lower potentialeconomic growth, downgraded risks from high indebtednessand debt-service ratios, are enhancing the appeal ofemerging markets.The benefits of international investment should be viewedagainst the backdrop of the risks. In fact, currencies, especiallyduring crises, have the potential to fall sharply over short periodsof time. For example, the Brazilian real depreciated by 53% in2002, converting a 1.5% local equity gain into a 33.7% loss forunhedged US dollar based investors. In 2008, the real fell oncemore against the US dollar, this time by 33%.8 This even includes currencies that are officially pegged to the investor’s own domestic currency. There is a non-quantifiable politically-derivedrisk that a peg is adjusted or removed.9 MSCI Barra, Global Equity Allocation, March 2012.10 IMF CPIS database. Currency allocations outside the majors have grown from an average of 3.4% to 6.5% in the last 10 years for investorsfrom the US, Europe, Switzerland and Japan.16_17
- Page 6 and 7: Macroeconomic events: support andch
- Page 8 and 9: In US dollar terms, prices fell dur
- Page 10 and 11: Volatility: low levels belie nervou
- Page 12 and 13: The interaction of all assets on av
- Page 14 and 15: • Strong global equity market per
- Page 16: • The Fed’s preferred measure o
- Page 21: US$ Local 2 CurrencyUS$ Local 2 Cur
- Page 24 and 25: Emerging-market investment incurs p
- Page 26 and 27: The case for gold as a foreignexcha
- Page 28 and 29: Furthermore, structural changes exp
- Page 30 and 31: For example, the Mexican peso crisi
- Page 32 and 33: Portfolio impact of hedging exchang
- Page 34 and 35: Portfolio construction and gold eff
- Page 36 and 37: Currency tail-risk hedging using go
- Page 38 and 39: Appendix I: Gold and currenciesHist
- Page 40 and 41: Appendix II: Mechanics of a foreign
- Page 42 and 43: Appendix III: Referenced indices an
- Page 44 and 45: The case for gold in portfoliorisk
- Page 46 and 47: Because gold tends to have little c
- Page 48 and 49: The role of gold in reducing extrem
- Page 50 and 51: The role of gold for reducing extre
- Page 52 and 53: As previously discussed, gold’s b
- Page 54 and 55: Portfolio impact stemming from pote
- Page 56 and 57: AppendixTable 2: Name keys for asse
- Page 58 and 59: Why consider a non-US dollar numér
- Page 60 and 61: In addition, despite gold’s retur
- Page 62: In fact, the average change in gold
- Page 65 and 66: AppendixTable 2 : EM central-bank g
The role of currencies in internationalportfolio managementForeign-exchange is a key area of focus within portfolio riskmanagement due to the fact that international allocation asa source of diversification has become a well-establishedpractice – especially after the 1970s and the adoption of modernportfolio theory. But every foreign investment exposes aninvestor to exchange-rate risk – whether large or small. 8In the 1990s, international diversification began to incorporateemerging markets alongside the more traditional developedmarkets. The trend toward global portfolios led to a drop indomestic equity bias among developed-market investorsbetween 1997 and 2010, from 78% to 48%. 9 From anexchange-rate perspective, allocation to assets denominatedoutside the major currencies – namely the US dollar, euro,pound sterling, Swiss franc and Japanese yen – albeit still small,doubled between 2002 and 2011. 10 Emerging markets havebeen beneficiaries of internationalisation over the last decade.A number of reasons underlie this trend including better growthopportunities, access to new products and new markets, andincreased issuance of government and corporate bonds. Inaddition, the lack of opportunities in developed markets, dueto low sovereign and corporate bond yields, lower potentialeconomic growth, downgraded risks from high indebtednessand debt-service ratios, are enhancing the appeal ofemerging markets.The benefits of international investment should be viewedagainst the backdrop of the risks. In fact, currencies, especiallyduring crises, have the potential to fall sharply over short periodsof time. For example, the Brazilian real depreciated by 53% in2002, converting a 1.5% local equity gain into a 33.7% loss forunhedged US dollar based investors. In 2008, the real fell oncemore against the US dollar, this time by 33%.8 This even includes currencies that are officially pegged to the investor’s own domestic currency. There is a non-quantifiable politically-derivedrisk that a peg is adjusted or removed.9 MSCI Barra, Global Equity Allocation, March 2012.10 IMF CPIS database. Currency allocations outside the majors have grown from an average of 3.4% to 6.5% in the last 10 years for investorsfrom the US, Europe, Switzerland and Japan.16_17