13.07.2015 Views

Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective

Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective

Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

88 <strong>Prices</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>knowledge</strong>point that ‘the whole of a static complex production <strong>process</strong> couldconceivably be surveyed “from beginning to end” because the time<strong>and</strong> effort necessary for the survey would not render the gatheredinformation obsolete’. However, it is doubtful that, without aframework stimulating entrepreneurship, time <strong>and</strong> effort would leadto the discovery of much <strong>knowledge</strong>. Similarly, at another pointLavoie says, when referring to <strong>market</strong> economies, thatthe sheer number of persons whose productive activity has to bemutually coordinated grows until it includes most of the world’spopulation. Simultaneously, the complexity <strong>and</strong> variability of thisproductive activity increases even more dramatically. Whereas it hadbeen possible within traditional society to achieve a more or lesscomplete coordination of actions of members of the community intheir production activities according to one established technology,in the Market this becomes quite impossible.(Lavoie 1985b:37)The idea that a high degree of co-ordination can be reached more orless completely in a ‘traditional’ society 40 raises the followingquestion: to what extent is such a statement consistent with a <strong>market</strong><strong>process</strong>approach that insists that the world be viewed indisequilibrium terms? Surely the claim is not that it is only ‘theMarket’ that operates in disequilibrium conditions? Rather, the pointis that it is <strong>market</strong>s that overcome to the largest extent the ignorancethat is the cause of disequilibrium. This apparent inconsistency maybe due to some ambiguity in the term ‘co-ordination’. Because anattempt at its clarification sheds additional light on the distinctionbetween types of ignorance, a brief digression follows.The meaning of co-ordinationThe term ‘co-ordination’ is used, particularly by modern <strong>market</strong><strong>process</strong>economists, as a substitute for the term ‘equilibrium’, to referto the co-ordination of individual plans <strong>and</strong> actions. 41 But there issome ambiguity in its use that may lead to confusion. To overcome it,a distinction will be made between ‘co-ordination of <strong>knowledge</strong>’ <strong>and</strong>‘co-ordination of actions’.The notion of co-ordination of actions seems quite clear. In thecase of, say, a centrally planned, hierarchical organization such as

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!