13.07.2015 Views

Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective

Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective

Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

74 <strong>Prices</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>knowledge</strong>believes that it is this Hayekian view that best describes the <strong>market</strong>sof reality (43).What is, in Simon’s view, the achievement of the <strong>market</strong>? This iswhere considerations of bounded rationality enter the scene:even without assumptions of perfect competition <strong>and</strong> perfectrationality <strong>market</strong>s provide a way of restricting how much we needto know about everyone else’s business in order to do our own. The<strong>market</strong> mechanism may provide a way to reach tolerablearrangements in a society even if optimality is beyond reach.(Simon 1983:89)Markets constitute ‘one of the mechanisms that enable human beingshaving limited information <strong>and</strong> computational capacity to operatemore or less intelligently’ (ibid.). To illustrate his point, Simonprovides an example showing how a buyer needs to know only theprice of a good to make his purchasing decision; no <strong>knowledge</strong> of howthe good is made, of the supplier’s problems, etc., is necessary.Markets <strong>and</strong> prices turn out to beextremely powerful mechanisms in modern societies for helpingeach of us to make decisions without having to learn a whole lot ofdetail about other people who may be involved. All the relevantinformation is summed up in the price we have to pay in order tomake the transaction.(ibid.: 88)In Simon’s interpretation, Hayek’s defence of the <strong>market</strong> does not reston its achievement of optimal states. Instead, its defence is based on anawareness of the computational limits of human beings:Market <strong>process</strong>es commend themselves primarily because theyavoid placing on a central planning mechanism a burden ofcalculation that such a mechanism, however well buttressed by thelargest computers, could not sustain. They conserve information<strong>and</strong> calculation by making it possible to assign decisions to theactors who are most likely to possess the information (most of itlocal in origin) that is relevant to those decisions. 23(Simon 1981:41)For Simon (1981:49, 51), <strong>market</strong>s are only one of the ‘mechanisms for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!