13.07.2015 Views

Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective

Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective

Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Equilibrium prices <strong>and</strong> information 55arrangements seem to operate most effectively in the face of imperfectinformation’ has not yet been fulfilled. 35DISEQUILIBRIUM PRICES AND INFORMATIONThis chapter has drawn a rather sharp difference between theinformational role attributed to prices by an equilibrium interpretationof Hayek’s 1945 article <strong>and</strong> the <strong>market</strong>-<strong>process</strong> view. The former, itargued, consists of the claim that price-taking agents, guided solely by<strong>market</strong> prices, would make correct decisions. The <strong>market</strong>-<strong>process</strong>view argues that ‘incorrect’ (i.e. disequilibrium) <strong>market</strong> prices provideincentives, in the form of pecuniary profit opportunities, to thediscovery of better alternatives by entrepreneurial agents. It was alsobriefly mentioned that adoption of the <strong>market</strong>-<strong>process</strong> view does notimply the complete denial of the other role <strong>and</strong> that, therefore,arguments such as those of Thomas Sowell in his book Knowledge<strong>and</strong> Decisions, which rely extensively on it, still retain much validityfrom a <strong>market</strong>-<strong>process</strong> <strong>perspective</strong>. This point will now be argued inmore detail.The concern of many economists, as shown, is that <strong>market</strong> pricesin reality are affected by several factors that make them inefficientconveyors of information for price-taking agents. These factorsinclude diverse deviations from the theoretical model of perfectcompetition, mostly those under the label of externalities. On theother h<strong>and</strong>, for modern Austrian economists the <strong>market</strong>, which theyview as a disequilibrium <strong>process</strong>, will always have ‘wrong’ prices—that is, prices that lead to losses <strong>and</strong> profits because they are notperfectly adjusted to each other. Such prices, as was mentionedbefore, will also be inefficient conveyors of information if they are toguide price-taking (as opposed to entrepreneurial) agents. 36 It is forthe case of purely price-taking agents that Coddington (1975:154)can rightly say that ‘in a world where outof-equilibrium trading isbinding rather than hypothetical there is no presumption that <strong>market</strong>prices are very serviceable as <strong>knowledge</strong> surrogates; indeed, they aregenerally misinformation surrogates’.Therefore, <strong>market</strong>-<strong>process</strong> economists would have to see twoproblems with prices as conveyors of information in the equilibriumsense: not only would, for example, externalities make themimperfect, but also the fact that <strong>market</strong> prices are never fully adjustedto each other. (Because in this view an equilibrium state is never

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!