Equilibrium prices <strong>and</strong> information 31assumptions that Hurwicz describes as belonging to a ‘classicalenvironment’ hold (i.e. absence of externalities, public goods,increasing returns, indivisibilities, <strong>and</strong> so on), the perfectlycompetitive price mechanism is ‘informationally best’. It is‘informationally best’ in the sense that ‘it uses the minimum numberof variables for transmitting information between economic units’(Hurwicz 1984:421). 7 But this conclusion, attributed to Hayek, isfound to be invalid for ‘non-classical’ environments that are believedto be more realistic.This literature then attempts the theoretical design of‘informationally decentralized’ resource allocation mechanismscombining planning <strong>and</strong> <strong>market</strong>s that may achieve more efficientresults than perfectly competitive <strong>market</strong>s for such ‘non-classical’environments. It takes as given ‘that there is initial dispersion ofinformation, with each economic unit <strong>process</strong>ing only partial<strong>knowledge</strong> of the environment’ <strong>and</strong>that it is impossible to transfer this information to other units insuch a way that at some stage of the <strong>process</strong> some one unit wouldbe, through messages received from others, in possession ofcomplete information concerning [the environment] or concerningthe proposed actions of all the other units,i.e. ‘that it is impossible through communication to centralizedispersed information’ (Hurwicz 1972:301; emphasis removed). 8What is relevant for the purposes of this book, however, is theseauthors’ interpretation of Hayek’s argument. It turns out that, because itis similar to that of other economists considered here, this particularapproach need not be examined separately. Many of the arguments inthis chapter will, with some adjustments, be applicable to it.GROSSMAN AND STIGLITZ’S ARGUMENTThe ‘informational efficiency’ of pricesGrossman <strong>and</strong> Stiglitz (1976:246) point out, as an introduction to theirwork, thatalthough the price system is conventionally praised as an efficientway of transmitting the information required to arrive at a Pareto
32 <strong>Prices</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>knowledge</strong>optimal allocation of resources, the context in which the pricesystem is usually discussed is not one in which the informationalefficiency of the price system can be properly evaluated.Questions of how the price system leads the economy to respondto a new situation, how it conveys information from informedindividuals to uninformed individuals, <strong>and</strong> how it aggregates thedifferent information of different individuals, are never directlyattacked.Theirs is an attempt to remedy this perceived deficiency. As a result,Grossman claims to have ‘formalized Hayek’s contention that pricesare aggregators of information’ <strong>and</strong> to have proved that ‘if prices aresufficient statistics, the competitive economy where traders havediverse information generates allocations that cannot be improvedupon by a central planner with all the information’ (ibid.: 252).However, the ‘competitive economy’ is usually assumed to havecostless information, <strong>and</strong> Grossman <strong>and</strong> Stiglitz think that theinformational role of prices is of interest only when information iscostly. 9 Like most information-as-a-commodity economists, theyseem to believe such a context is the only alternative to the full<strong>knowledge</strong>situation found in the perfectly competitive model. But itis precisely when information is costly, they argue, that prices cannotbe sufficient statistics <strong>and</strong> that, therefore, Hayek’s arguments aboutthe achievements of the price system run into trouble. They considerdifferent possible cases:Fully informative pricesIf, as they interpret Hayek to be saying, prices fully reflect allavailable information, that is, if the ‘price system is a perfectaggregator of information’, no equilibrium exists, according toGrossman (1976:574), when information is costly. ‘A perfectcompetitive <strong>market</strong> will break down because no equilibrium existswhere information collectors earn a return on their information, <strong>and</strong>no equilibrium exists where no one collects information.’ In otherwords, if <strong>market</strong> prices reflect all necessary information, there is noincentive for anyone to engage in the costly activity of acquiring itbecause each trader could do equally well by observing only theprice, instead of purchasing the information (ibid.: 581–2). But then,of course, prices will not reflect information because it is notrewarding for anybody to collect it.
- Page 2: Prices and knowledge
- Page 6: ContentsAcknowledgmentsvii1 Introdu
- Page 10 and 11: Chapter 1IntroductionIn recent deca
- Page 12: Introduction 3to changes, and not a
- Page 15 and 16: 6 Prices and knowledgeOUTLINE OF TH
- Page 17 and 18: Chapter 2A theory of the market pro
- Page 19 and 20: 10 Prices and knowledgeexistence of
- Page 21 and 22: 12 Prices and knowledgebehavior of
- Page 23 and 24: 14 Prices and knowledgedisequilibri
- Page 25 and 26: 16 Prices and knowledgeresources kn
- Page 27 and 28: 18 Prices and knowledgeproduce, bet
- Page 29 and 30: 20 Prices and knowledgeimportant in
- Page 31 and 32: 22 Prices and knowledgeauxiliary’
- Page 33 and 34: 24 Prices and knowledgeSome writers
- Page 35 and 36: 26 Prices and knowledgeall practica
- Page 37 and 38: 28 Prices and knowledgemarket parti
- Page 39: 30 Prices and knowledgeprices fully
- Page 43 and 44: 34 Prices and knowledgeAn example.
- Page 45 and 46: 36 Prices and knowledgeIn this case
- Page 47 and 48: 38 Prices and knowledgeequilibrium.
- Page 49 and 50: 40 Prices and knowledgethose return
- Page 51 and 52: 42 Prices and knowledgeprices in th
- Page 53 and 54: 44 Prices and knowledgeThe informat
- Page 55 and 56: 46 Prices and knowledgeinformationa
- Page 57 and 58: 48 Prices and knowledgeas devices f
- Page 59 and 60: 50 Prices and knowledgeIt is probab
- Page 61 and 62: 52 Prices and knowledgetrue that in
- Page 63 and 64: 54 Prices and knowledgeknowledge st
- Page 65 and 66: 56 Prices and knowledgereached in r
- Page 67 and 68: 58 Prices and knowledgecorrespond t
- Page 69 and 70: 60 Prices and knowledgetake it away
- Page 71 and 72: 62 Prices and knowledgecritics of t
- Page 73 and 74: 64 Prices and knowledgeto work out
- Page 75 and 76: 66 Prices and knowledgebehavior in
- Page 77 and 78: 68 Prices and knowledgerich’ worl
- Page 79 and 80: 70 Prices and knowledgeThus the sim
- Page 81 and 82: 72 Prices and knowledgeSimon calls
- Page 83 and 84: 74 Prices and knowledgebelieves tha
- Page 85 and 86: 76 Prices and knowledgeIf what is u
- Page 87 and 88: 78 Prices and knowledgeoccurring wi
- Page 89 and 90: 80 Prices and knowledgecomputationa
- Page 91 and 92:
82 Prices and knowledgemaximizing a
- Page 93 and 94:
84 Prices and knowledgeframework de
- Page 95 and 96:
86 Prices and knowledgeAgain Mises
- Page 97 and 98:
88 Prices and knowledgepoint that
- Page 99 and 100:
90 Prices and knowledgeand B’s ta
- Page 101 and 102:
92 Prices and knowledgecoordination
- Page 103 and 104:
94 Prices and knowledgeFinally, the
- Page 105 and 106:
96 Prices and knowledgeBefore prese
- Page 107 and 108:
98 Prices and knowledgeas will be s
- Page 109 and 110:
100 Prices and knowledgeapples in l
- Page 111 and 112:
102 Prices and knowledgeThe identif
- Page 113 and 114:
104 Prices and knowledgeAs with Sim
- Page 115 and 116:
106 Prices and knowledgerealized th
- Page 117 and 118:
108 Prices and knowledgedeliberate
- Page 119 and 120:
110 Prices and knowledgeframework s
- Page 121 and 122:
112 Prices and knowledgeMarkets and
- Page 123 and 124:
114 Prices and knowledgeassigned an
- Page 125 and 126:
116 Prices and knowledgemain virtue
- Page 127 and 128:
118 Prices and knowledgechapter 3 t
- Page 129 and 130:
120 Prices and knowledgenoticed, wo
- Page 131 and 132:
122 Prices and knowledgeAs a by-pro
- Page 133 and 134:
124 Notesmoney, the behavior of arb
- Page 135 and 136:
126 Notes14 It is not clear why the
- Page 137 and 138:
128 Notes39 See also Hahn (1984a:11
- Page 139 and 140:
130 Notestheories of cognition held
- Page 141 and 142:
132 Notes3 Economists, Nelson and W
- Page 143 and 144:
ReferencesAkerlof, G.A. (1970) ‘T
- Page 145 and 146:
136 ReferencesGilad, B. (1981) ‘A
- Page 147 and 148:
138 ReferencesKihlstrom, R.E. and M
- Page 149 and 150:
140 ReferencesOsana, H. (1978) ‘O
- Page 151 and 152:
142 Referencesfrontiers of analytic
- Page 153 and 154:
144 IndexCercone, N. 79change: and
- Page 155 and 156:
146 Index61, 118; on costless infor
- Page 157 and 158:
148 Indexmisinformation 55, 57mista
- Page 159:
150 IndexVeljanowski, C.G. 43voting