Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective
Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective
Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Conclusions 1193. The argument this book presents is that the informationalrole of prices is understood more fully if analysed indisequilibrium terms. Although contemporary economic theoryhas not been very interested in the analysis of disequilibrium,widely respected economists, cited in chapter 2, argue that manyimportant phenomena may never be understood if economics isconfined exclusively to the analysis of equilibrium states. Thecrucial role of prices as incentives to entrepreneurial discovery,this book argues, is such a phenomenon. The main case againstanalysing only equilibrium states is that in equilibrium many ofthe serious informational problems actually faced by individualsare already solved. Only when disequilibrium <strong>market</strong> <strong>process</strong>esare analysed can prices be seen as stimulating genuineentrepreneurial discovery. This very important informationalrole is not apparent in equilibrium. In fact, it is therefore not somuch that this informational role has been neglected by mosteconomists as that it has been missed because the equilibriumframework currently used by the economics of information doesnot encompass it.For the disequilibrium analysis of prices, this book drew from thework of economists who are interested in the <strong>market</strong> <strong>process</strong> ratherthan in equilibrium states. In this approach, radical ignorance <strong>and</strong>entrepreneurial discovery play a central part. Rivalrous competitionis the <strong>market</strong>’s way of attempting to overcome, even if only partially,the <strong>knowledge</strong> problem. <strong>Prices</strong> perform a crucial informational rolein this competitive <strong>process</strong>: disequilibrium prices provide profitopportunities that spark entrepreneurial discovery of new <strong>knowledge</strong>.They are not merely summaries or sources for inferring information.At the same time, this approach does not require denying theimportance of these other informational roles of prices.Disequilibrium prices might not perform those roles at allsuccessfully if ‘being in disequilibrium’ were to mean that they arecompletely ‘wrong’ <strong>and</strong> changing almost r<strong>and</strong>omly. The only reasonwhy <strong>market</strong> prices are usually fairly dependable, <strong>and</strong> may be able toperform the equilibrium informational roles reasonably well, is thatthe profits they provide continuously stimulate a competitivediscovery <strong>process</strong> that incorporates valuable <strong>knowledge</strong> into them.Without this capacity, prices would most likely perform noinformational role at all. It is in this sense that the disequilibriuminformational role of prices is literally fundamental. (Even someonewho prefers to view <strong>market</strong> prices as equilibrium prices, it should be