Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective
Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective
Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Change, responsiveness <strong>and</strong> co-ordination 113chapter 4, leaves unanswered the question of what differences, if any,there are between a <strong>market</strong> <strong>and</strong> a decentralized bureaucracy.The distinction this section will make is between price-mediatedtransacting <strong>and</strong> appropriately decentralized organizations in general,although the differences pointed out in the previous section between<strong>market</strong> <strong>and</strong> non-<strong>market</strong> hierarchies are also important here.Even though Simon may be right in criticizing some economistsfor holding excessively simplified notions of organizations, there isa sense in which economists are ultimately right in regarding anyorganization as being centralized. This can be better explained withthe help of an example. Suppose that an individual believes that theorganization he is creating should be designed as a decentralizedhierarchy (perhaps because of the complexity he thinkscharacterizes the task to be performed). He will then specify whichdecisions will require his intervention <strong>and</strong> which will better be leftto the different individuals in his organization. 20 He will perhapseven reward the latter, through some incentive system, for makingwhat he regards as successful decisions (thus stimulating the use ofthe entrepreneurial abilities he may have perceived them topossess).This description should start to suggest that <strong>market</strong>s <strong>and</strong>decentralized hierarchies, even though they might be consideredequally good simplifying devices by a <strong>perspective</strong> thatemphasizes the need for economizing the individual’s limitedcomputational capacities, are quite different when viewed from a<strong>perspective</strong> concerned with discovery. Even if this organizationmay be said to be decentralized, the perceived need for it <strong>and</strong> itsspecific design has come from a single entrepreneurial mind—that of the ‘planner’ —<strong>and</strong> the members of the organizationoperate within the guidelines, <strong>and</strong> for the purposes, set by thismind.Hayek (1973: esp. 46–54) deals with a similar issue when hecontrasts the ‘rules’ (as opposed to detailed comm<strong>and</strong>s) of anorganization with those of a ‘spontaneous order’ —a category inwhich he includes the <strong>market</strong>. According to Hayek,what distinguishes the rules which will govern action within anorganization is that they must be rules for the performance ofassigned tasks. They presuppose that the place of each individual ina fixed structure is determined by comm<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> that the rules eachindividual must obey depend on the place which he has been