13.07.2015 Views

Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective

Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective

Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Change, responsiveness <strong>and</strong> co-ordination 1094 Price-mediated transactions versus decentralized <strong>market</strong>hierarchies.5 Several comparisons between <strong>market</strong> <strong>and</strong> non-<strong>market</strong> hierarchies,both in their centralized <strong>and</strong> in their decentralized versions.Pairing (1) was, in most interpretations, the subject of the socialistcalculation debate. Pairings (3) <strong>and</strong> (4) are, within economics, thesubject of the analysis of organizations, a field pioneered by RonaldCoase’s classic article (1937). Although not much will be said aboutthem here, both the view of competition as a discovery procedure<strong>and</strong> some remarks made by Hayek regarding organizations, to bequoted below, provide hints of possible contributions of a <strong>market</strong><strong>process</strong>approach to this analysis.The task to be attempted by this section, however, is more limited.First, it will point out some important differences between non<strong>market</strong><strong>and</strong> <strong>market</strong> (entrepreneurial) hierarchies—the pairs includedunder (5) —from a <strong>market</strong>-<strong>process</strong> <strong>perspective</strong>. Then it will try toshow why decentralized hierarchies could not be perfect substitutesfor the price system—the pair included in (2) —as solutions to theproblems of centralized planning. 16Non-<strong>market</strong>- <strong>and</strong> <strong>market</strong>-designed organizationsIt is not always apparent in the writings of the bounded-rationalityauthors whether they see any significant theoretical differencesbetween non-<strong>market</strong>- <strong>and</strong> <strong>market</strong>-designed organizations. In fact, theabsence of a clear-cut distinction between them suggests that thedifferences are not believed either to exist or to be very important.However, some differences can be pointed out that are important.The differences appear most clearly when comparing how, forexample, government, on the one h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> private individuals, onthe other, decide between carrying out an activity through ‘<strong>market</strong>s’(i.e. competition via a price mechanism) or through ‘hierarchies’ (ororganizations, or planning); <strong>and</strong>, if deciding to create a ‘hierarchy’,how they choose the type of organization to adopt, the specificpersonnel to be included, <strong>and</strong> so on.In government hierarchies, <strong>market</strong> competition is replaced bycentral direction, or planning. This, to a certain extent, is also true offirms. As Coase (1937:389) put it, ‘the distinguishing mark of thefirm is the supersession of the price mechanism’. 17 Planning, from anentrepreneurial <strong>perspective</strong>, has the disadvantage of not providing a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!