13.07.2015 Views

Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective

Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective

Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

108 <strong>Prices</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>knowledge</strong>deliberate co-ordination, what type of co-ordination would be best,<strong>and</strong> so on. Of course, were one to start by assuming that the plannerhas superior <strong>knowledge</strong> of <strong>market</strong> conditions <strong>and</strong> opportunities, itcould follow that his intervention is desirable. But this assumption ishighly objectionable from an entrepreneurial <strong>perspective</strong>, <strong>and</strong> noplanning proposal has yet explained satisfactorily how it could bejustified.An entrepreneurial view of organizationsPrivate enterprise, in Nelson’s view, has the advantage of makingthe problems of the transmission of information <strong>and</strong> of thecomputation of solutions much more manageable for individualswith bounded rationality. In fact, the advantages Nelson attributesto private enterprise are mostly due to its being highlydecentralized. This leads to the question of why the same, or evenbetter, results could not be achieved by decentralizing a planningsystem. An answer to this question requires a prior clarification ofterminology <strong>and</strong> an outline of an entrepreneurial view oforganizations.Many economists, not only Nelson or Simon, use terms such as‘<strong>market</strong>’ <strong>and</strong> ‘hierarchy’ frequently to encompass different things.Therefore, in discussions of the relative merits of ‘<strong>market</strong>s versushierarchies’, several interpretations of the terms ‘<strong>market</strong>s’ <strong>and</strong>‘hierarchies’ are possible. 14 First, when talking about ‘<strong>market</strong>s’ thereference may be to price-mediated transactions only or also to<strong>market</strong>-generated hierarchies (such as firms). (Market-<strong>process</strong>economists generally use the term in this latter sense.) Second, anallusion to ‘hierarchies’ may refer to <strong>market</strong> or to non-<strong>market</strong>hierarchies. 15 Finally, ‘hierarchies’ could be seen as encompassing arange of organizations from highly centralized to decentralized. Withthese distinctions in mind, the following pairs of comparisons couldbe meant by ‘<strong>market</strong>s versus hierarchies’:1 Price-mediated transactions versus highly centralized non-<strong>market</strong>hierarchies.2 Price-mediated transactions versus decentralized non-<strong>market</strong>hierarchies.3 Price-mediated transactions versus highly centralized <strong>market</strong>hierarchies.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!