13.07.2015 Views

Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective

Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective

Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Change, responsiveness <strong>and</strong> co-ordination 99is the appropriate thing this time’ (Nelson 1981: 101). The problem‘involves responding to unforeseen changes in dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> supplyconditions, <strong>and</strong> the challenge <strong>and</strong> opportunity of innovation’ (ibid.:99).Nelson believes that many of these issues were dealt with quiteexplicitly in the Mises-Lange-Hayek socialist calculation debate. Hisinterpretation of this debate helps to better underst<strong>and</strong> his position.Nelson <strong>and</strong> the calculation debateAccording to Nelson (1981:94), Mises’s proposal was ‘not that privateenterprise was optimal’ 6 but rather that <strong>market</strong> prices were ‘anessential aspect of any decently working information <strong>and</strong> computationsystem’ (Nelson <strong>and</strong> Winter 1982:360). Without them, producerswould have no economically relevant information to enable them todecide which goods to produce <strong>and</strong> what combinations of inputs touse; it would be ‘administratively infeasible’ for a central planner toachieve a ‘sensible allocation of resources’ (Nelson 1981:94). Withprices ‘the computation problem simplifies to calculations of profit orcost’ (Nelson <strong>and</strong> Winter 1982:360).In Nelson’s interpretation Lange’s reply involved a recognition ofthe role of prices. Lange produced a solution in which consumers<strong>and</strong> plant managers would make their decisions on the basis of pricesadjusted in response to excess dem<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> supplies by the centralauthority, ‘in effect, simulating a <strong>market</strong>’ (ibid.: 361). For Nelson,both Mises <strong>and</strong> Lange were arguing within a ‘static frame’. Hayek,on the other h<strong>and</strong>, was one of the ‘important exceptions to the static<strong>perspective</strong>’. He emphasized that ‘the conditions facing theeconomic system—resources, technologies, <strong>and</strong> preferences—tendto be variable’ <strong>and</strong> that these variations are ‘particular to place <strong>and</strong>time, <strong>and</strong> unpredictable’ (Nelson 1977:133–4). 7 Nelson’sinterpretation of Hayek’s argument is quite revealing of his boundedrationalityview of the economic problem <strong>and</strong> deserves therefore tobe quoted in full:Hayek’s objection to the Lange proposal involved an interestingblend of propositions about information computation <strong>and</strong> aboutcomm<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> control. He argued that Lange’s information-flowscheme could not h<strong>and</strong>le the enormous amount of detailed dataspecific to particular times <strong>and</strong> places. A rise in the dem<strong>and</strong> for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!