2004 “Remittances, savings, and development in migrant-sendingareas,” In D. Massey and J. Edward Taylor (eds.), <strong>International</strong>migration: Prospects and policies in a global market, OxfordUniversity Press, New York, pp. 157-173.Wang, K.2004 “Remittances stimulated hometown economy, vice mayorsaid,” World Journal, 2 April, E3.Wong, E.2005 “Militants release Chinese hostages,” The New York Times, 22January.2005 “Eight Chinese were safely released in Iraq,” 23 January, A1.Zhuang, G.2000 The relationship between overseas Chinese and China(huaqiao huaren yu zhongguo de guanxi), Higher EducationPublishing House, Guangzhou, Guangdong.294
AppendixTable 1. Village-Level Remittance Amount (Previous and Cumulative Years)VillageMafuProp.SendersPreviousYearEmigrantsProp.SendersCumulativeAverageTotalPrevious Year Cumulative Previous Year Cumulative1 55 0.945 0.982 $4,986.60 $42,687.44 $259,302.96 $2,347,809.152 60 0.983 0.983 $7,407.86 $53,116.40 $437,063.69 $3,186,984.133 54 0.981 0.981 $6,617.21 $39,476.98 $350,712.09 $2,131,757.134 58 0.897 0.914 $8,992.36 $41,856.41 $467,602.56 $2,427,671.615 35 0.971 0.971 $10,346.64 $42,301.15 $351,785.71 $1,480,540.276 37 0.919 0.946 $11,227.85 $43,781.14 $381,746.74 $1,619,902.087 10 1.000 1.000 $10,339.77 $43,833.12 $103,397.69 $438,331.218 45 0.844 0.933 $10,003.87 $33,885.83 $380,147.06 $1,524,862.189 9 0.889 0.889 $16,150.21 $61,886.84 $129,201.68 $556,981.5210 11 1.000 1.000 $7,438.88 $51,504.16 $81,827.73 $566,545.7411 21 0.905 0.952 $21,093.23 $52,839.01 $400,771.32 $1,109,619.3012 8 1.000 1.000 $7,155.99 $28,619.10 $57,247.90 $228,952.7713 7 0.857 0.857 $3,302.33 $9,753.59 $19,813.95 $68,275.1514 11 1.000 1.000 $13,404.45 $56,347.15 $147,448.99 $619,818.6915 3 1.000 1.000 $15,056.02 $39,356.61 $45,168.07 $118,069.8216 9 1.000 1.000 $7,837.28 $35,986.07 $70,535.54 $323,874.6317 4 0.750 1.000 $12,955.18 $98,562.63 $38,865.55 $394,250.5118 8 1.000 1.000 $17,331.93 $66,735.11 $138,655.46 $533,880.90Changxiao1 21 1.000 1.000 $5,633.70 $51,978.36 $118,307.61 $1,091,545.612 42 0.857 0.952 $5,001.16 $34,140.80 $180,041.66 $1,433,913.593 82 0.902 0.951 $4,996.68 $59,623.30 $369,754.32 $4,889,110.434 44 0.909 0.955 $5,042.02 $42,786.85 $201,680.67 $1,882,621.485 51 0.902 0.980 $6,281.29 $43,762.90 $288,939.40 $2,231,908.146 42 0.905 0.976 $7,318.04 $72,567.34 $278,085.46 $3,047,828.147 40 0.875 0.975 $15,750.84 $98,883.61 $551,279.50 $3,955,344.468 26 0.731 0.769 $8,157.77 $47,832.55 $154,997.70 $1,243,646.419 42 0.857 0.929 $10,220.59 $49,468.66 $367,941.33 $2,077,683.5910 17 0.706 0.765 $10,150.70 $68,110.98 $121,808.44 $1,157,886.6511 66 0.985 1.000 $9,102.31 $58,121.89 $591,649.85 $3,836,044.9312 61 0.918 0.951 $10,771.84 $46,874.80 $603,223.16 $2,859,363.0713 64 0.875 0.938 $9,770.87 $51,475.55 $547,168.61 $3,294,435.0114 65 0.923 0.969 $6,320.18 $48,044.97 $379,210.99 $3,122,923.3315 55 0.891 0.927 $9,274.48 $51,944.66 $454,449.34 $2,856,956.0616 57 0.807 0.930 $16,802.69 $72,771.89 $772,923.75 $4,147,997.67Tujiang1 36 1.000 1.000 $4,386.29 $27,965.44 $157,906.49 $1,006,756.002 32 0.969 1.000 $8,328.82 $44,484.35 $258,193.28 $1,423,499.163 68 0.985 1.000 $5,101.66 $49,173.57 $341,811.14 $3,343,802.594 62 0.935 0.984 $5,694.00 $51,048.41 $330,252.10 $3,165,001.385 48 0.958 1.000 $7,089.19 $50,571.35 $326,102.94 $2,427,425.036 31 0.935 0.968 $11,056.58 $46,390.70 $320,640.76 $1,438,111.71295Total 1497 0.918 0.960 $8,426.25 $50,492.02 $11,577,663.19 $75,611,931.23
- Page 2 and 3:
The opinions expressed in the repor
- Page 5 and 6:
Table of ContentsForeword1 Migratio
- Page 7:
Foreword
- Page 10 and 11:
UN recorded that 61 million migrant
- Page 12 and 13:
about this and other programmes. Se
- Page 15:
Introduction
- Page 18 and 19:
overseas ethnic markets; and the wa
- Page 20 and 21:
labor migration. This narrower topi
- Page 22 and 23:
narrowing income inequalities withi
- Page 24 and 25:
and 2004 has increased the urban po
- Page 27:
Connecting Internaland Internationa
- Page 30 and 31:
it comes to questions of migration
- Page 32 and 33:
internal and international migratio
- Page 34 and 35:
the larger cities. British ships we
- Page 36 and 37:
states. At present, as part of our
- Page 38 and 39:
36and one on international migratio
- Page 40 and 41:
perspective 3 that gives methodolog
- Page 42 and 43:
commercial, industrial and service
- Page 44 and 45:
taken place in migration flows. The
- Page 46 and 47:
to what was left of the original en
- Page 48 and 49:
sought refuge in Lima. It was not p
- Page 50 and 51:
husband who sought refuge and work
- Page 52 and 53:
that take place between migrants an
- Page 54 and 55:
to the flows of goods, resources an
- Page 56 and 57:
migration and close to Huancayo) or
- Page 58 and 59:
In some cases, families would regul
- Page 60 and 61:
Furthermore, the precise compositio
- Page 62 and 63:
This suggests that, instead of aimi
- Page 64 and 65:
Brynes, D.M.2003 Driving the State:
- Page 66 and 67:
1984 Miners, Peasants and Entrepren
- Page 68 and 69:
Werbner, P.1990 The Migration Proce
- Page 70 and 71:
Genealogy 1: Jiménez Family in 197
- Page 72 and 73:
Since the 1990s, there has been a b
- Page 74 and 75:
migrant receiving areas, 2 but focu
- Page 76 and 77:
well as discussing some of the cons
- Page 78 and 79:
carried to Ghana by migrants. 40 pe
- Page 80 and 81:
Table 2. Cost (in Euro) of Formal a
- Page 82 and 83:
home countries, for example, throug
- Page 84 and 85:
These insurance events can constitu
- Page 86 and 87:
Having people collect similar data
- Page 88 and 89:
people they knew. In fact, some of
- Page 90 and 91:
For migration research, this means
- Page 92 and 93:
ReferencesAppadurai, A.1996 Moderni
- Page 94 and 95:
Glick Schiller, N., and G. Fouron19
- Page 96 and 97:
Marcus, G.1995 “Ethnography in/of
- Page 98 and 99:
Portes, A., and J. DeWind2004 “A
- Page 100 and 101:
Stark, O., and D. Bloom1985 “The
- Page 102 and 103:
AppendixTable A.1. Two-country Tran
- Page 104 and 105:
initially entails high costs and ri
- Page 106 and 107:
To our knowledge, no study has esti
- Page 108 and 109:
2.1 Remittances and Income in Rural
- Page 110 and 111:
with its neat correspondence to the
- Page 112 and 113:
let z > 0 denote the predetermined
- Page 114 and 115:
Table 3. Gini Decomposition by Inco
- Page 116 and 117:
Table 4b. Gini Decomposition by Inc
- Page 118 and 119:
3.2 Effects of Migrant Remittances
- Page 120 and 121:
4. ConclusionsOur findings using na
- Page 122 and 123:
Knowles, J.C., and R.B. Anker1981
- Page 124 and 125:
Taylor, J.E.1992 “Remittances and
- Page 126 and 127:
124Table 2. Rural Mexico Household
- Page 128 and 129:
Central Region45Percentage of Villa
- Page 130 and 131:
128Figure 3. Relationship between P
- Page 133 and 134:
7Labor Market Flooding? Migrant Des
- Page 135 and 136:
Reibel (1997); David Card (2001); a
- Page 137 and 138:
The net immigration rate can be tak
- Page 139 and 140:
is S 0. It establishes an equilibri
- Page 141 and 142:
consequence a highly elastic supply
- Page 143 and 144:
in the populous fourteen states of
- Page 145 and 146:
out were both at work in this case
- Page 147 and 148:
Figure 7 identifies what we call
- Page 149 and 150:
Figure 9. Total Net In-Migration an
- Page 151 and 152:
Figure 10. Dynamic Economy ModelFig
- Page 153 and 154:
6. ConclusionThe dynamic and open e
- Page 155 and 156:
ReferencesAbowd, J.M., and R. Freem
- Page 157 and 158:
1999 “Historical perspectives on
- Page 159 and 160:
Hatton, T., and J.G. Williamson1998
- Page 161:
White, M.J. and Y. Imai1994 “The
- Page 164 and 165:
seasonal basis, to areas with more
- Page 166 and 167:
for agricultural labor were 15 and
- Page 168 and 169:
3. Why People MoveThe decision to m
- Page 170 and 171:
producers are facing heavy losses a
- Page 172 and 173:
in Mumbai, which capitalizes on peo
- Page 174 and 175:
In conclusion, migration can bring
- Page 176 and 177:
is also being experienced in many r
- Page 178 and 179:
ReferencesBal Kumar, K.C.2003 “Mi
- Page 180 and 181:
Lipton, M.1980 “Migration from ru
- Page 182 and 183:
Shylendra, H.S., and P. Thomas1995
- Page 184 and 185:
182Able-bodied men.Women migrateonl
- Page 186 and 187:
Majority of (ST)Baiga and Ghondsmig
- Page 188 and 189:
Single caste villageof (OBC) Dhimar
- Page 191 and 192:
9A Socio-Cultural Perspective on Mi
- Page 193 and 194:
of households reported having at le
- Page 195 and 196:
Drawing on these perspectives, I ar
- Page 197 and 198:
migration tend to imitate the behav
- Page 199 and 200:
What is presented below is therefor
- Page 201 and 202:
ate of exchange and was thus sent t
- Page 203 and 204:
which was an important consideratio
- Page 205 and 206:
some migrants had started chitties,
- Page 207 and 208:
The extended family constituted a c
- Page 209 and 210:
much individuals had “locked up i
- Page 211 and 212:
edistribution were enforced through
- Page 213 and 214:
and the definition of status in eac
- Page 215 and 216:
perceived, the status-seeking activ
- Page 217 and 218:
Engelbrektsson, U.1978 The force of
- Page 219 and 220:
Parry, J. and M. Bloch1989 “Intro
- Page 221 and 222:
10Migrant Workers’ Remittances an
- Page 223 and 224:
in labor migration emerged after, a
- Page 225 and 226:
husband and wife, four daughters an
- Page 227 and 228:
(Table 3). In the central and weste
- Page 229 and 230:
Table 5. Composition of Rural House
- Page 231 and 232:
Figure 3. Rural households’ Net I
- Page 233 and 234:
schistosomiasis, etc. This decline
- Page 235 and 236:
of them deposit the money in a bank
- Page 237 and 238:
to train new rural migrants in the
- Page 239 and 240:
Figure 4. Per Capita Temittance in
- Page 241 and 242:
ReferencesBai Nansheng et al.2002
- Page 243 and 244:
Lu Mai et al.2002 “Zhongguo nongc
- Page 245: Xinhuanet2002 “Woguo Zhongxibu la
- Page 248 and 249: agriculture (Cook 1999), producing
- Page 250 and 251: evenue (MR) minus the marginal cost
- Page 252 and 253: Before reform, the annual quota of
- Page 254 and 255: Table 2 Regional Distribution of In
- Page 256 and 257: Figure 3. Sources of China’s Econ
- Page 258 and 259: migration are removed, all wage and
- Page 260 and 261: urban-biased policies persisted, pr
- Page 262 and 263: eform. Under the hukou system, Chin
- Page 264 and 265: The institutional barriers faced by
- Page 266 and 267: ecause of the rapid migration of th
- Page 268 and 269: Migrant workers have hardly any opp
- Page 270 and 271: ReferencesAu, Chun-Chung, and Verno
- Page 272 and 273: Lin, Justin, Gewei Wang, and Yaohui
- Page 275 and 276: 12International Migration and Devel
- Page 277 and 278: 2. BackgroundThe recent rise in int
- Page 279 and 280: of remittances: self-employment, a
- Page 281 and 282: Given the size of recent emigration
- Page 283 and 284: 5. Remittances: An OverviewTable 1
- Page 285 and 286: interpret. Some of it may be caused
- Page 287 and 288: 8. A Decision to Repatriate MoneyIn
- Page 289 and 290: emittances in the year prior to the
- Page 291 and 292: fourth one, Xiamen, is in Fujian Pr
- Page 293 and 294: ReferencesAdelman, I., J.E. Taylor,
- Page 295: Massey, D.1988 “International mig
- Page 299 and 300: Table 4. Logistic Regression Models
- Page 301 and 302: Table 6. Logistic Regression Models
- Page 303 and 304: Table 8. Logistic Regression Models
- Page 305 and 306: 13Remittances in the Latin American
- Page 307 and 308: to anti-money laundering and suspic
- Page 309 and 310: Finally, mulas may be sporadic trav
- Page 311 and 312: has left from countries in Western
- Page 313 and 314: Table 2: Remittances and Key Econom
- Page 315 and 316: Source: National Money Transmitters
- Page 317 and 318: One way this redistributive effect
- Page 319 and 320: Managua reported having a relative
- Page 321 and 322: America have a higher rate of havin
- Page 323 and 324: Table 9 Frequency of Immigrant Trav
- Page 325 and 326: Guyana offers an interesting exampl
- Page 327 and 328: In addition to exports of these goo
- Page 329 and 330: Hemisphere. Figure 7 refers to the
- Page 331 and 332: alternatives. Five years ago, it wa
- Page 333 and 334: concentration is pronounced, innova
- Page 335 and 336: emittance recipients have a higher
- Page 337 and 338: AppendixData Methodology on Pricing
- Page 339 and 340: Fagen, P., and M. Bump2005 “Remit
- Page 341: 2003 Receptores de remesas en Ecuad
- Page 345 and 346: 14A Framework for Linking and Compa
- Page 347 and 348:
to jobs, savings, and networks that
- Page 349 and 350:
were expanding. That “flooding”
- Page 351 and 352:
ural families to repay debts, satis
- Page 353 and 354:
ut case studies, including that of
- Page 355 and 356:
would do well to examine how variou
- Page 357 and 358:
Carter and Sutch challenge the argu
- Page 359 and 360:
networks combine internal and inter
- Page 361 and 362:
4. Policy ImplicationsWhat implicat
- Page 363 and 364:
government should improve migrant w
- Page 365 and 366:
challenge for development practitio
- Page 367 and 368:
community members could help to cla
- Page 369:
itself). While research and analysi