Karuna Trust, Karnataka - ZEF
Karuna Trust, Karnataka - ZEF Karuna Trust, Karnataka - ZEF
Good and Bad Practices in MicroinsuranceKaruna Trust, IndiaA manager in Karuna’s field office has a controlling and backstopping function, particularlyfor the revolving fund. UNDP set up a Rs. 500,000 fund during the pilot phase to enableimmediate reimbursement. The manager regularly withdraws money from the account andhands it over to their social workers. NIC directly reimburses this bank account. He checkscompleteness of the documents submitted by the social workers after a payment is made to aclient before he reimburses the social worker’s emergency fund. He can be described as thefinancial controller in the field. About one fourth of his time is dedicated to the insurancecomponent of Karuna’s activities.Placed in health facilities where inpatient admission is frequent, hospital social workershave their own office and work full time on insurance. They maintain an inpatient register(Annex 1) and verify and settle the claims. After a patient is admitted to the hospital, thesocial worker checks the facility’s admission book and verifies the insurance membership ofthe person through a computer programme designed and provided by NIC.The social worker maintains a voucher book to record the claim and the money paid to theclient (Annex 2). Generally, compensation to the client for wage loss is intended to be paidon a daily basis, although sometimes it is done when the patient is discharged from hospital.To compensate patients for wage loss immediately, the social workers carry Rs. 5,000 ($114)from the revolving fund as an emergency fund.One further important task of the social workers is to enrol new members. During thesubscription period, the social workers market the insurance scheme—about one third of theclients in the latest renewal round joined in through these social workers. It is agreed with theinsurance company that even patients admitted to hospital can still join.Karuna Trust established a network of local social workers at the Gram Panchayat 14 levelwho are involved in implementing all of Karuna’s activities. These social workers attend theSHG meetings. Although the main purpose of the self-help groups is microfinance, they serveas an entry point for the distribution of the insurance product. The social workers explain theconcept of insurance and collect the premiums in the groups. Non-SHG-members canapproach the self-help groups to join the insurance scheme. The social workers at GramPanchayat level are the direct link to Karuna Trust.Only public health care providers are eligible in the scheme. Since doctors in T. Narsipurdecided not to do the claim verifications and processing for the scheme, social workers wereplaced there. The doctors interact closely with the social workers; however, in few casesinterpersonal problems hinder smooth collaboration.Certain documents need to be provided by the health facility to guarantee immediatesettlements of claims. The most important document is the discharge summary signed by thetreating doctor (Annex 3). In the public facilities, Karuna’s poor clientele usually get freetreatment or only needs to pay a very modest contribution. Table 2.3 summarises thestakeholders’ main responsibilities.14 Local administrative entity in India; usually covers four to six villages.18
Good and Bad Practices in MicroinsuranceKaruna Trust, IndiaTable 2.3 Stakeholders’ Main ResponsibilitiesConceptualDevelopmentAdvertisingPremiumCollectionClaimSettlementFinancialManagementFinancialBackupHealth CareProvisionKaruna Trust Head officeXNIC Regional OfficeXNIC Divisional Office X XHealth AuthoritiesXProject CoordinatorXProgramme Coordinator X X XSocial Worker X X XSelf Help Groups X XHealth Care ProvidersXInsurance ExpertiseThe insurance experience of the managers varies. While the staff of NIC has extensiveknowledge, the concept was new to Karuna’s staff. The staff of Karuna Trust in turn hasextensive experience in dealing with the target group. Most middle-level managers at Karunahave master’s degrees; most social workers have undergraduate degrees.The Centre for Population Dynamics (CPD), a private not-for-profit research institution, wasinvolved in the conceptualization of the scheme. Some of their staff members conductedinsurance training at the health centres and with the staff of Karuna Trust. The health careproviders were the focus of the training with special attention paid to the doctors.The goal of the training module for doctors was to communicate the purpose and elements ofhealth insurance and their key role in the process. The training made sure that doctors knewthe basics about health insurance, how it is applied, and its main advantages. The doctorswere encouraged to ensure proper identification of the beneficiary and to document and issuereceipts properly. Furthermore, ethical guidelines were given to the training participants.2.3 Resources and External RelationshipsThe pilot phase (2002-2004) of the project was implemented by a consortium of five partners:Karuna Trust, UNDP, NIC, Centre for Population Dynamics, and Karnataka’s healthauthorities. UNDP and the Ministry of Health decided to develop a few community healthfinancing pilot schemes and provided about $450,000 through UNDP. These funds were usedto finance the first two years (2002-2004) of the pilot scheme in T. Narsipur, Bailhongal, andthe extensions of the schemes to two other taluka. NIC agreed to design a new product forthis pilot insurance scheme, designed in collaboration with Karuna Trust and CPD. It wasCPD’s task to assist in conceptualizing the product and to monitor the implementation.Karnataka’s health authorities were involved in matters regarding cooperation with the publichealth facilities. In Bailhongal taluk – unlike in T. Narsipur – the scheme was fullyimplemented through the health authorities.19
- Page 1 and 2: Karuna Trust, KarnatakaIndiaCGAP Wo
- Page 3 and 4: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 5 and 6: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 7 and 8: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 9 and 10: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 11 and 12: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 13 and 14: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 15: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 18 and 19: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 20 and 21: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 22 and 23: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 24 and 25: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 28 and 29: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 30 and 31: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 32 and 33: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 34 and 35: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 36 and 37: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 38 and 39: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 40 and 41: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 42 and 43: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 44 and 45: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 46 and 47: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 48 and 49: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 50 and 51: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 52 and 53: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
- Page 54: Good and Bad Practices in Microinsu
Good and Bad Practices in Microinsurance<strong>Karuna</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>, IndiaTable 2.3 Stakeholders’ Main ResponsibilitiesConceptualDevelopmentAdvertisingPremiumCollectionClaimSettlementFinancialManagementFinancialBackupHealth CareProvision<strong>Karuna</strong> <strong>Trust</strong> Head officeXNIC Regional OfficeXNIC Divisional Office X XHealth AuthoritiesXProject CoordinatorXProgramme Coordinator X X XSocial Worker X X XSelf Help Groups X XHealth Care ProvidersXInsurance ExpertiseThe insurance experience of the managers varies. While the staff of NIC has extensiveknowledge, the concept was new to <strong>Karuna</strong>’s staff. The staff of <strong>Karuna</strong> <strong>Trust</strong> in turn hasextensive experience in dealing with the target group. Most middle-level managers at <strong>Karuna</strong>have master’s degrees; most social workers have undergraduate degrees.The Centre for Population Dynamics (CPD), a private not-for-profit research institution, wasinvolved in the conceptualization of the scheme. Some of their staff members conductedinsurance training at the health centres and with the staff of <strong>Karuna</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>. The health careproviders were the focus of the training with special attention paid to the doctors.The goal of the training module for doctors was to communicate the purpose and elements ofhealth insurance and their key role in the process. The training made sure that doctors knewthe basics about health insurance, how it is applied, and its main advantages. The doctorswere encouraged to ensure proper identification of the beneficiary and to document and issuereceipts properly. Furthermore, ethical guidelines were given to the training participants.2.3 Resources and External RelationshipsThe pilot phase (2002-2004) of the project was implemented by a consortium of five partners:<strong>Karuna</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>, UNDP, NIC, Centre for Population Dynamics, and <strong>Karnataka</strong>’s healthauthorities. UNDP and the Ministry of Health decided to develop a few community healthfinancing pilot schemes and provided about $450,000 through UNDP. These funds were usedto finance the first two years (2002-2004) of the pilot scheme in T. Narsipur, Bailhongal, andthe extensions of the schemes to two other taluka. NIC agreed to design a new product forthis pilot insurance scheme, designed in collaboration with <strong>Karuna</strong> <strong>Trust</strong> and CPD. It wasCPD’s task to assist in conceptualizing the product and to monitor the implementation.<strong>Karnataka</strong>’s health authorities were involved in matters regarding cooperation with the publichealth facilities. In Bailhongal taluk – unlike in T. Narsipur – the scheme was fullyimplemented through the health authorities.19